Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

House Cat

New Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About House Cat

  • Rank
  1. 24gray24, thanks for your input! I agree that the stigma around underpinning is ridiculous. But, my understanding was that in the UK the vendor was *legally obliged* to declare if the property had been underpinned, so we won't be able to sneak this under the radar by not disclosing. Unless you know of any exceptions to this?
  2. Hi dougless, and thanks for your comment! I didn't mean to imply that we will proceed with the remodel anyway, and just not underpin (if it turns out the existing foundations are not deep enough). The pertinent question is, do we continue with this project at all if the underpinning is likely to decrease the the market value of our home? Obviously we want to add value, and hopefully recoup some of the remodelling costs when it comes to selling the house. Our builder and architect say it's very common to underpin old properties during remodels, but I've been struggling to find any info on how it would affect future resale. People are frequently advised not to buy underpinned property, but most discussions just focus on subsidence risk and don't mention remodelling.
  3. We are planning a major remodel of our end terrace Victorian house, which would essentially transform the ground floor into one open plan space. This would involve knocking through what used to be the rear wall of the original ground floor, and installing an RSJ and two vertical posts to support the floor above. We just received the RSJ calculations from a structural engineer, with the following comment: "We have designed the frame with stiff moment connections at the top to avoid the need for large underpins. However if your builder finds the existing foundations are very poor and shallow, underpins may be required anyway (Builder to check that existing foundations are at least 500mm wide and 600mm deep. If not, allow for provisional 900x900x300thk GEN3 underpins, under both posts)" This potential underpinning concerned me, as far as both resale and insurance is concerned. However, having spoken to my home insurance provider, I was reassured that it wouldn't affect my premiums, as long as underpinning is done for remodelling, rather than subsidence reasons. They said they deal with these situations a lot, as old houses were built to different standards. But what about trying to sell the house in the future? Will we be shooting ourselves in the foot, and turning off the majority of prospective buyers, who will hear "underpinning" and run the other way? Or is there enough precedent for this kind of work for buyers to differentiate between remodelling- and subsidence-related underpinning? I've also come across some posts on this forum warning against the dangers of "partial underpinning" (i.e. only one side of the building, which is what we'd be doing if it turns out our existing foundations are not sufficient), which has apparently been known to put stress on the building and lead to future problems. Again, I'm not sure if this is only an issue with underlying subsidence, or if it's a problem in and of itself.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.