Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

macca13

Members
  • Posts

    1,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by macca13

  1. 10 hours ago, flb said:

     

    So, let's see, 10M. Assuming nobody died, that would mean 40 people per square kilometer. The current density is 413 in England. 68 in Scotland. 168 in Wales. Please do explain how it affects your life.

    I already did, my 20 min car journey now takes 1 hour 20 ( that's an extra 2 hours per day 10 hours per week that's 520 extra hours I spend in my car because of overpopulation. my doctor was same/next day is now 1-2 weeks. My air quality poorer.. I could go on forever the effects of overpopulation on quality of life..

    10 hours ago, flb said:

     Yet Europeans took the blame on this one, as we've noticed on the 24th of June.

    Well we could not vote to stop all immigration only Europe, I love Europe, Iv'e been to every country except Poland, never got round to that.. I'm not anti Europe, I'm anti population increase, I thought you would have noticed that!

    10 hours ago, flb said:

    Well, there's the problem.

    Your own benefit claimants don't want those jobs. I don't blame them - neither do I. Yet someone has to do those jobs. You wouldn't really like this place too much if nobody cleaned the streets, picked up your trash, served your coffee, sold your sandwich, would you....

    The fact that people can stay on benefits forever in here also means that new jobs mean more migrants coming in, because those new jobs need people and your people won't take those jobs.

    Spot the problem. Could it be that benefits are far too generous and they don't have a limited duration, so if you don't feel like working, you never have to?

    It seems to me that you're perfectly fine with the fact that your own people won't take those jobs, as they'd rather be on benefits. I didn't really hear that in the runup to the 23rd of June. I only heard about trillions of Europeans coming here to steal benefits and send them back home. 

    I'm pretty sure those aren't Bulgarian names (also his wife's name starts with a C and probably has a single R (not sure), but that's irrelevant).

    What we've got here is a British problem created by British people. Guess who's taking the blame? Well - migrants, of course. Makes sense, right?

    Incorrect.

    Completely our governments fault, they chucked most people on the scrap pile, stopped apprenticeships and made working worthless, most earn more on benefits than they could in work. But again you state like I have some power over it, I only have 1 vote.. Under Labor they put lots of lazy people on disability benefits to make unemployment look better, It does not help people it devalues them.

    10 hours ago, flb said:

    Houses do get built, because they do represent an investment, a safe way of holding on to your money. They also get bought for the same reason.

    Its a supply and demand, houses that get built with no people to live in them go down in value not up, (Liverpool houses for £1) especially with our current prices. If there was a sudden oversupply they would drop.

    10 hours ago, flb said:

    You have no say in whether something else gets built over a park or petrol station or whatever - and that's precisely how things should be. If anything, there should be no such thing as "planning permission".

    No Planning Permission? that would end well, national park, concrete, endangered species living in woods, cut trees down kill endangered species, concrete.. small house someone puts a 20 story building 2 ft from your bedroom window.. No planning permission would see the greedy just go mad, they would be building multi story carparks on greenbelt, chemical factories next to rivers with waste pipes spilling into the drinking water. I dont see how you can defend a statement like that.

    Remember I'm an anti population environmentalist, saying scrap planning permission and leaving it to the good nature of the UK's population to act ethically.. jokes

  2. 2 hours ago, Automotive Engineer said:

    this will be the shitshow of the century

    What we see coming to Europe now is but a trickle of what is to come, wait till this summer, it will probably finish Italy and Greece off, the money it costs to feed, cloth and house these people and the 2 countries facing bankruptcy are ones where the boats land. It cost Germany 22 billion last year alone, I'm guessing that it will become a much larger sum, 44, 66, 88..etc until the government start saying they need more taxes and everyone has to work till their 90 to pay for it!

    If only the billions we have sent in donations actually went to the people it was meant for instead of into the pockets of the corrupt. (2 billion each year on consultants) However I stand by my point, population control for the good of the planet.. otherwise we will kill it.. 

  3. 4 hours ago, flb said:

    You're driving away from the point - 500 miles/minute as well.

    1. There's no such thing as overpopulation in the UK.

    2. You're not on this forum because you're unhappy with the amount of people living in this country. You're unhappy with what you're supposed to pay for accommodation. So is (almost) everyone else - with the exception of banks, a handful of developers and tens of thousands of "professional landlords". I'm willing to bet 99% of them are British. Hey, you know what else is British? Margaret Thatcher's regulation about councils not building social housing anymore. What else? Help to buy. What else? MIRAs...do I need to go on? The amount of people has nothing to do with these.

    3. The amount of people in this country did not lower your living standards. Your governments did. You voted them in. Don't try to turn around and blame BTL and 0.x% interest rates and bailing out RBS/Lloyds on the amount of people. You know that's a lie. At least I hope you know.

    4. Did migrants put Tony Blair in charge? Did migrants sell the "BTL is better than pension" story - thus turning homes into investments, thus kicking the perma-HPI into full throttle? Who elected Blair? Is he a migrant too? Did migrants put him in charge? Did migrants force Cameron's hand with HTB? Did migrants kidnap Carney and force him to cut rates? Is Carney working for the Bank of Migrants?

    5. Well, here's a thought, if you really don't want to have flats around every corner (neither do I). Why don't you look at who sold the land, who bought the land and who gave planning permission? Would you like to bet that they're 100% British? How about - if that's what's really bothering you - just...throw them out. You know, solving the "overpopulation" issue at the same time.

    6. This is - once again - part of that sense of entitlement I just can't understand. It seems to me that you don't own the land, but you want to decide what's happening with it - whether it's going to be a park or a block of flats. Do you also go in your neighbour's house to tell him what you'll allow him to do in the house he paid for?

    It seems to me that you're ignoring the facts on purpose and withdrawing into the "overpopulation" excuse. India and China each have over one billion people. Yet here we are, in a country that uses as much land for golf courses as it uses for housing . With its 65-70M people, here you are, talking about overpopulation. Nah...

     

    I'm struggling to understand where this sense of entitlement comes from. This "they're supposed to like us if they want to be here". Perhaps you think  that migrants are here FOR YOU? Because they like YOU? Perhaps you think that if someone wants to move to your town or even neighbourhood, they're supposed to like you? Perhaps you even expect to have a say in it? 

    I find that hilarious. 

     

    1 last point as it's way past my bed time, when conservationist measure certain animal populations they look at impact to the surrounding environment. You are just simply saying China have 1 billion and we only have 70 million.. that's too simplistic. Reasources are finite and there is a balance between sustainable environmentally friendly population levels and your anology of who's got the biggest! 

    I know people don't believe in climate change and air pollution.. you can't see it so it's not effecting U, so therefore ignore and class people who talk about it as mad! 

    But I read so much about where we are heading, housing is important to me, it should be a right to own your home, not a position of leverage for the greedy not content with coexistence with others, more parasitic feeding off the blood of their fellow man. 

    But from all I have read we are heading towards cataclysmic disasters within the next 80 years.. it's the same greed that drives the BTL, that drives the oil Barron's, chief execs of large corporations, I'm alright jack, sense of entitlement..

    The worlds governments want more people, this drives economies, it does not lead to a better life.. you break down my arguments of population into race.. 

    Look at it more as preservation, trying to convince people that we must protect our environment and fight against the increase.. otherwise you are correct with your China analogy. Unbreathable air, concrete, and high rates of suicide.. why would I not fight against that.. 

     

  4. 3 hours ago, flb said:

    You're driving away from the point - 500 miles/minute as well.

    1. There's no such thing as overpopulation in the UK.

    2. You're not on this forum because you're unhappy with the amount of people living in this country. You're unhappy with what you're supposed to pay for accommodation. So is (almost) everyone else - with the exception of banks, a handful of developers and tens of thousands of "professional landlords". I'm willing to bet 99% of them are British. Hey, you know what else is British? Margaret Thatcher's regulation about councils not building social housing anymore. What else? Help to buy. What else? MIRAs...do I need to go on? The amount of people has nothing to do with these.

    3. The amount of people in this country did not lower your living standards. Your governments did. You voted them in. Don't try to turn around and blame BTL and 0.x% interest rates and bailing out RBS/Lloyds on the amount of people. You know that's a lie. At least I hope you know.

    4. Did migrants put Tony Blair in charge? Did migrants sell the "BTL is better than pension" story - thus turning homes into investments, thus kicking the perma-HPI into full throttle? Who elected Blair? Is he a migrant too? Did migrants put him in charge? Did migrants force Cameron's hand with HTB? Did migrants kidnap Carney and force him to cut rates? Is Carney working for the Bank of Migrants?

    5. Well, here's a thought, if you really don't want to have flats around every corner (neither do I). Why don't you look at who sold the land, who bought the land and who gave planning permission? Would you like to bet that they're 100% British? How about - if that's what's really bothering you - just...throw them out. You know, solving the "overpopulation" issue at the same time.

    6. This is - once again - part of that sense of entitlement I just can't understand. It seems to me that you don't own the land, but you want to decide what's happening with it - whether it's going to be a park or a block of flats. Do you also go in your neighbour's house to tell him what you'll allow him to do in the house he paid for?

    It seems to me that you're ignoring the facts on purpose and withdrawing into the "overpopulation" excuse. India and China each have over one billion people. Yet here we are, in a country that uses as much land for golf courses as it uses for housing . With its 65-70M people, here you are, talking about overpopulation. Nah...

     

    I'm struggling to understand where this sense of entitlement comes from. This "they're supposed to like us if they want to be here". Perhaps you think  that migrants are here FOR YOU? Because they like YOU? Perhaps you think that if someone wants to move to your town or even neighbourhood, they're supposed to like you? Perhaps you even expect to have a say in it? 

    I find that hilarious. 

     

    I may not own the country or the land but I am a tax payer so I get a vote.

    1) Net migration to the UK is 335'000 per year, that's 10 million in 3 years. How does that not effect my life?

    2) The Government are a pile of Poo, they are the dumbest most useless donkey farts we could find. 99% is not my experience having just sold my flat most were BTL and most did not have British accents. Only 1 European BTL out of the 35 I saw (Polish guy)

    3) All the time they can take people from countries with lower wage structures and offer them a whopping £7.50 an hour to become modern day slaves then of course they will come, I understand that not all migrants earn that but as our own Brit Benefits claimants earn more sitting at home than living on minimum wage they are the main occupiers of said jobs.

    4) Well Tony (I should be in prison for war crimes) Blair has nothing to do with me, I never voted for him.. His wife Sherrie (I have a large property portfolio) Blair tried to take the government to court to stop S24, claiming its not fair on the poor tenants that would have to pay for the increases in cost. So she was not planing on taking the hit herself by the sounds of it. She is also the owner of a large human rights firm, when Tony Blair introduced Human rights.. seems like a conflict of interest to me.

    5) Back to population, houses dont get built if there are no people to buy them, grass stays as grass..

    6) yes we do, planning permission, I dont like his extension I can object.

    China also has the highest Suicide rate, people are depressed and feel hopeless, good sign of where we are heading

     

  5. 4 hours ago, BuyToLeech said:

    What I've heard of the white paper is pretty good compared to what I expected.

    Doing nothing is a pretty good outcome considering what they normally do, unless I've missed something. 

    haha.. yes you do wonder if the government did nothing in the last 50 years would we be better or worse off.. remember we are always being told they are the brightest and best.. but the brightest and best of what..

  6. 2 minutes ago, flb said:

    Ah, so then, the 420k flats with a 200 pcm service charge are built for those trillions of Bulgarians coming here and bringing millions from their country to ruin your park - just to piss you off.

    Glad we cleared that up - it's the Eastern Europe greed. They're sending their millionaires here with their ******ing BTL - right?

    Overpopulation is overpopulation.. Its a global problem, Africa will hit 2 billion people by 2050.. they dont have enough resources to feed 1 billion.. Where do the people in charge think this is all going to end.. my guess is badly.. All I know is in my adult life increasing population = lower living standards. my 20 min drive now takes 1 hour 20 mins. my next day doctors appointment now takes 1 to 2 weeks. and of course my mums 90k house is now 750k. All driven by population increase and greed.. the last thing we need is more greed and more people.

    We need to have an honest discussion about sensible population levels, I think the planet will die, by 2100 the sea is predicted to rise 2 meters and half of the worlds remaining species will be extinct.

    I'm not joking about the park by the way, they do actually want to concrete over half of it! until they run out of ideas and concrete over the other half!

    2 thirds of the pubs gone

    2 thirds of the petrol stations gone

    every corner of grass is now flats..

     

  7. 1 hour ago, PaTrickUK said:

    I don't know where you get these idiotic ideas from. The "EU kids" with the same or better skills are not and DO NOT work at 2/3 of the hourly rate, they have no reason to do so, UK companies fight to hire them. I work for a fairly large company in London where 50% or more are from the EU and they are all paid the market rate, well, above the market rate if I'm to be honest. When it comes to most skilled jobs, take IT for instance, we spend tens of thousands on recruitment and it takes around three months to recruit a single person. The UK just doesn't have enough skilled people and once we are out of the EU I can see that going up to six-eight months. That's if the company doesn't decide to do the logical thing and relocate to another EU country like Ireland, Germany, Spain or Romania, where it can still recruit from the 500 million EU citizens. You will find that all the other companies in need of highly trainer people are in the exactly the same situation. I for one would welcome such I move. I don't see why I should pay my taxes to this nation of bigoted, self absorbed cretins.

    The school of thought that we should continue to concrete over the country, continually lowering our living standards so businesses can line their pockets.. congested roads, increased pollution, overcrowded towns and cities, less green spaces, more crime/terrorism, lower wages, collapsing public services, smaller and smaller houses with huge price tags, bankrupting the country.. all so our pay masters can get richer.. How bigoted.. you are quite right we should all bend over a take one for the rich! where did i leave my small violin ( I could not afford a big one as my rent is so high ) quick get more people in to the country I just noticed the kids park at the end of the road has not had flats built on it yet! Us selfish cretins dont need parks! we need to be more welcoming..

    Where does population increase X infinity end? 

  8.  

    30 minutes ago, One-percent said:

    I've no doubt that there is a skills shortage in some areas. I would argue that this is due by and large by employers shirking their responsibilities to,train their own workforce. The large employers who need fairly high level skills do train and do it well. Many though just whinge and moan that school/college/university leavers do not have the 'right' skills.  What they really mean is they expect the tax payer (you and me) to pick up the tab for training their employees. Government have gone a little way in addressing this through the training levee    

    Agreed, why spend government/company money on training when you can have labor imported already trained. However, are the qualifications as good as those from a UK college/university? 

     in 2012, three quarters of doctors struck off were trained abroad. 

  9. 3 hours ago, CunningPlan said:

    5% of the population of the UK is from Europe. 5% of NHS staff are from Europe

    13% of the population of UK is non-UK born. 12% of NHS staff are non UK born.

    You could assume that Brexit is a zero sum game for the NHS, unless you believe that non UK-born use the NHS more than their UK born counterparts.

     

    I totally agree I go mad when mp's use the "look at our NHS" card. Everyone nods and accepts that without migrants it would not run..

    but its cause and effect, add 10 million more migrants, 50'000 more doctors required.. 100'000 more builders required.. more people forever need more services.. remove migrants from the country for the last 80 years and you would probably not need the 50'000 NHS workers..

    we have all turned into brainwashed sheep, overpopulation is not for our benefit and will not make our life better! 

  10. On 11/02/2017 at 0:55 PM, Exiled Canadian said:

    I think that this is the key point.  The HMRC are effectively in business (as I was told by a wise old accountant many years ago) - until S24 most BTL would actually have had relatively little tax to pay as they seem to structure their affairs such that the rent just about covers the mortgage interest and other costs (by leveraging up like loons).  Hence the return to HMRC for tracking down BTL evaders and then getting the cash out of them is relatively small and probably not worth significant time and resources.

    The cost benefit balance of going after BTL evaders is now moving quite rapidly to support investment in enforcement efforts for a number of reasons:

    1. As noted by others "big data" and cheaper, more powerful IT makes identifying potential evaders quicker and cheaper.
    2. S24 means that the liabilities being evaded will be higher, making the return on a successful investigation higher.

    Any BTL tax evaders reading should also note that once HMRC identifies that you have been "economical" with the truth of your financial affairs they can go back to look at previously accepted returns and demand interest and further penalties on previous unpaid tax.  hence the longer before they catch you, the bigger the payoff when they do and the more and more effort they are going to put into finding you.....I'd sell now and sell everything.

     

     

    All these free "check you credit score" companies are not what they seem.. the people inputting their data are oblivious that the data they supply is being cross referenced then can be sold to different agencies/councils to stop fraud. You could enter an address and the data can be crossed referenced against names, tax database to see if anything pings up..  The golden rule, there is no such thing as free!

  11. 1 hour ago, Bear Hug said:

    Absolutely. Lowering the living standards for everyone in the country solves the immigration problem at once, while still being politically correct so everyone is happy.  No need for Brexit!

    Overpopulation in London has already lowered living standards, polluted air, congested transport, people losing 4 hours a day of their lives traveling to work, Concreting over yet more of the countryside to accommodate the world’s population in shoe boxes and moving people even further away from their place of work and family will just make life intolerable.

    I'm convinced that immigration is costing us money despite the rhetoric from government. We are increasing our services sector with mass immigration, full of low paid, low skilled jobs that have low tax yields, how can it be beneficial to our prosperity? It is beneficial to the large corporate prosperity to have slaves but not that of the residents of the country. 

    I would love for an independent honest accountant to look at immigration costs factoring in, health care, schools, benefits, pensions, crime, housing and also how much of the money earnt is farmed out to the home nations from which they came. Also the asset stripping by the EU, contributions and loss of money through EU competition laws where we buy goods and services from other EU countries that could be sourced locally employing local people. I think the loss to the UK and its people is gargantous. You only have to look at our countries spiraling debt and stagnant wages to realize the government are lying about how brilliant it all is!

  12. 15 hours ago, Sancho Panza said:

    Telegraph 10/7/17

    'Unite Students has bought a block of student accommodation in Birmingham for £227m - the largest single asset of its kind ever to come to the market.

    The block, called Aston Student Village, serves Aston University with more than 3,000 bedrooms. It is the first on-campus accommodation Unite will own. The developer has traditionally concentrated on building its own blocks near the UK’s top universities, rather than on campuses themselves.

    Unite partnered with Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC to make the purchase, which was sold by the university and Lloyds bank.

    Aston Student Village is currently the only student halls on offer to students at Aston University, which has a student population of 11,000 and is in the centre of Birmingham.

    The acquisition of the property takes the number of beds Unite has in Birmingham to more than 5,000.

    In total, the company provides a home for more than 50,000 students in 140 properties across England and Scotland.

    Figures from UCAS showed that total university applications were down 5pc this year, with the biggest drop seen in students from the European Union, down 7pc. Students from outside the EU were up 0.1pc.

    However, demand for university places remains robust, with demand still outsripping the number of places available.'

     

     

    There are several aspects to consider here.

    1) Firstly,the amount of money lent out to private student BTL's.Who are the banks going to save?Big customers with big debts,or all the little blokes with the odd place?

    2) Student numbers dropping.This has been going on for a while as students realise they'll never clear their debts.HESA data available.Key figure to watch is UK domiciled columns.

    3) More students studying from home.

    4) The big banks/SWF's linking up to commoditise the student lettings market,potentially cutting up the businesses of the local BTL's at both ends via restricting recruitment via the Uni's and via tighter lending.

     

     

    Interesting times.That hooting in the distance is the train coming down the line.

    Student accommodation being built everywhere in Kingston, loads of houses down my relatives road are buytolet, you can tell as they are filthy dirty and have rubbish everywhere as they don't do recycling and the bin police refuse to take their rubbish.. also traffic cones in front garden ?

    http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/local/kingstonnews/10670922.Residents__anger_as_Cambridge_Road_estate_student_flats_scheme_is_approved/

    2 massive developments just going up, that will hurt the buytolet for sure.. must be well over 700 rooms+ That I know of going up including the above.. maybe I underestimate the area but it must make some difference.. there are not many pubs left to turn into flats?

  13. On 10/02/2017 at 10:43 PM, Wayward said:

    to reply ti the OP...yes of course all the time. Nearly all my family and friends are "prices only go up" ...well it is over 20 years since the last meaningful crash in the 90s. 2008 was hardly a blip where I live and quickly 'remedied' by TPTBs lunatic and damaging schemes.

    if you think about where high hpi ultimately will lead us it is a dark vision...a very divided and unstable society, neo feudalism...perhaps ask pro hpiers to consider this for a moment, because most never have. What is their vision of the future...where does hpi fit into this and in what way can hpi be positive in this vision???

    most people are pro hpi I believe (at mo) and this is reflected in politics...tyranny of the majority.

    Ive been wondering this for ages.. what happens when generation rent retire? I currently pay £1250pm and my retirement pension is predicted at £450pm (private)

    i don't know figures but once people have inheritance etc.. asumming 20-30% of the population rent, when they retire who picks up the tab/shortfall.. it will bankrupt the country surely? Or am I missing something? Also care homes, normally they take your house to pay for these.. no house, no money?

  14. 11 minutes ago, wherebee said:

    Lets imagine houses half in value. GBP also drops 25% against the dollar/basket of foreign currencies.

    You are a Chinese businessman who's made your first million of free profit.  Your friends all have property in the UK, most in PCL but some in the suburbs where they rent to extended family.

    Someone phones you up and say that houses in London are now around 40% the cost of a year ago.

    Do you i) wait, hoping to get an extra 20% off but run the risk of losing everything in China due to a corrupt local government official (happens) or a court finding out about your dodgy dealings whilst you built your empire (common)

    ii) fill yer boots.

     

    I know what I would do

     

    Until they plug the foreign investor gap, I think the next crash will be cushioned more than previous natural crashes were...

     

    China have moved to stop money leaving the country:

     

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-estate/china-canada-foreign-buyers/article33485996/

  15. 48 minutes ago, Tapori said:

    Welcome. Good find. Even listings get manipulated by EA's listing things for Rent or sale that are not available, just to get people interested. Twats.

    Thanks, been reading on here for ages, being a slave paying someone else's mortgage I thought it a good idea to sign up.. common sense tells me that this market is a train crash waiting to happen, especially with, Brexit, Frexit, Itexit, Nexit, Grexit, Gerexit.. Rising inflation, falling £, The Donald, Italian banks 350 billion black hole (3rd of Euro bad debt) Deutsche Bank problems, American debt ceiling in March (current $22 trillion) Putin, Kim jong, Turkey, Iran the migrant crisis waiting to pick up pace (cost Germany 22 billion last year) Climate change rising sea levels, 2 meters by 2100, that's posh London flats under water in the next 80 years (and Bognor Regis lol)

    If anyone has anything positive to add as I can only see a list of potential disasters, my nic name is happy.. lol

     

  16. Not just S24 but Basel 3 as well..

     

    Sell off in 2018/19?

    Our analysis of the data used to populate the table on the prior page suggests that we might see BTL property coming to the sales market between April 2018 and April 2019. This is when the first and second tranches of the removal of interest rate relief come into effect which will be combined with an increase in capital charges for banks under Basel III which will push mortgage rates up.

     

    It will just not be economically viable for many Landlords to continue to provide rental accommodation and if they want to, they may find themselves trapped by not being able to re-new their financing. This is GREAT news for the government as there will be more properties on the market (bearing in mind that if the 19% of the Landlords in the NLA poll do sell that, will be an additional 163,000 homes on the market 

     

    This situation does seem to us akin to a slow motion train crash: BTL Landlords with Mortgages are standing on the track in a game of chicken with regulatory locomotive, hoping to time their exit as best as possible. This high-risk game will almost undoubtedly leave casualties.

     

    http://www.maskells.co.uk/news/maskells-research/what-next-for-the-buytolet-market-in-london.html

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information