Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

FallingAwake

Members
  • Posts

    1,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FallingAwake

  1. Isn't that like saying there's a concerted and coordinated attempt to discredit Jimmy Saville?
  2. We need a HPC Modelling Committee. I tend to suspect they would be more accurate than SAGE, as long as @MonsieurCopperCrutch is excluded.
  3. Or... and I know this is a radical idea... they've seen the adverse effects firsthand?
  4. Nobody, if the preventative was proven to be safe. Less than a year of trials, and then a year of real world testing has (at least in my eyes) failed to prove that these vaccines are safe, or in the case of children, even necessary. I'm not just talking about all the adverse events, which have now clocked up to several million in the EU and over a million in the US. People will say, yes but how many lives has it saved. Well, OK. However, we don't know the long term effects of repeatedly injecting mRNA that forces cells to produce trillions of Spike proteins, and doing this every 3-6 months. Spike proteins are not good for you. They are not like a protein shake! There has already been a paper published which indicates it interferes with cell copying mechanisms (i.e. the machinery that prevents mutations / copying errors). What else does it interfere with? I'm sceptical of both sides of the argument. Maybe it is relatively safe after all. For me, it's too early to tell.
  5. Most people couldn't spell anti-prophylaticer. (Including me, according to the red line under the word )
  6. I'm curious. What's the difference between the tests that are being phased out in the US on 31st December 2021, and the ones replacing it... other than (true story) Bill Gates having invested in the latter?
  7. 'It's completely under studied, how the female genitals are represented in the somatosensory cortex in humans, and whether it has at all the capacity to change in relation to experience or use,' co-author Christine Heim, a professor of medical psychology at Charite University Hospital in Berlin, told AFP. You didn't stick around for the long term studies?
  8. Anyway, stay healthy all. Keep your immune system healthy. Interactive Nutrition Facts Label - Vitamins And Minerals Chart https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/interactivenutritionfactslabel/assets/InteractiveNFL_Vitamins&MineralsChart_March2020.pdf That's a big list of nutrients in that doc. Notice the "Nutrient to get more of" label next to Vitamin D, Calcium, Iron, Potassium and Sodium... courtesy of the FDA!
  9. Slightly off-topic, but I thought this was kinda ironic. Turns out the "horse dewormer" might have other uses after all: Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/ "Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase. On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs." [my bold] So I guess that'll be another paper to suppress by the "health" industry? Anyway, worth knowing for those who might have cancer issues. It might (or might not) do anything for covid... but every cloud...
  10. Precisely. The scary SAGE models aren't necessarily just for government consumption. The government convey these ideas to the public, and they react accordingly. Job done.
  11. It will be fascinating to see how long they work for. Presumably they only have a few weeks of data at the moment. How long will "safe and effective" mean this time round, and how many Spike protein shots can a body handle? Guess we'll know the results soon, in this live long-term experiment.
  12. Good marketing campaign for "GET BOOSTED NOW" though, right? How many people were thinking, "Meh, I won't bother to get boosted"... but then the Scary Omicron came along, and they thought, "Ehhh, I might as well. For Queen and Country (but mostly 'cos I want go abroad)." 5/5 for Marketing 👍
  13. But in this instance, it's not even complicated. Let's say, for the sake of argument, the figures are the same as in November, i.e. roughly 50% vexxed, 50% unvexxed. "It's about half and half, but there are far more vaccinated people in the country than unvaccinated, so 50% is still a lot, proportionally." That took me 2 minutes, and most people would understand that. Or he could use a simple analogy. I don't buy the "simplify" argument. 90/10 or whatever he said is a lie, assuming it's closer to 50/50 as in November. (I accept the situation could have changed dramatically in December. Let's see the official figures. We know how many people died from Omicron, but why not how many vaxxed/unvaxxed are in ICU with Omicron?) Precisely.
  14. Sure, I agree it could be true. What's frustrating is, we are seeing people in the media and even Savid Javid himself, make assertions, but the public don't have access to the data on ICU admissions, so they assume that Javid is telling the truth and forming an impression. If it turns out to be untrue 6 months later when they release the data, nobody will care much, but the impression will still remain. If and when the data becomes officially available, I predict you will shrug your shoulders. I will remind you that Javid and others around this time out-and-out lied. (Of course, if it turns out to be true I will freely admit I was wrong, and that they weren't liars after all.) But by then, we'll be already onto the next set of lies, and you'll be asking me why I don't trust what they're saying at the time then. Why do you think we (the public) can get almost up-to-date data on cases, Omicron cases, deaths, admissions to hospital... but somehow ICU data is hard to come by, and only published by an entity that isn't even officially part of the government or NHS as far as I know? Could it be because the data would ruin their narrative? Surely if it supported their narrative, they would be eager to publish it. "Blame the unvaccinated" is clearly the message they will be returning to once the booster campaign is over, and not the crappy vaccine that focused on one protein, which Omicron is now evading. The next variant may evade it even more.
  15. Yes, we've established that. But still makes Javid out to be a liar, unless the situation has suddenly changed in December. It could have, but publish the stats so we can see. These ICU stats aren't published by UKHSA even though the publish all the other covid stuff.
  16. Yes, you'd think it would be verifiable. So publish the official numbers already. If this is going to become a talking point (as it clearly is already), then there should be official numbers available. Also, do the vaccines work against Omicron? I thought it dropped to close to 0% effectiveness, so the truly unvaccinated (instead of the soon-to-be redefined unvaccinated) won't be catching up, since the booster only apparently protects because of the 2X + 1 effect, unless I'm missing something. Isn't that why the government were urging people to get a booster? By definition, the unvaccinated can't get a "booster" of something they haven't even had yet. So which is it? (1) The vaccines don't work against Omicron without a booster. (2) They do work against Omicron, so no need for a booster. You can see why we (the foolish unvexxed) need official statistics to confirm the things that come out of their lying or obfuscating mouths.
  17. They're being fired because apparently they're putting patients at risk. So you're fine with them doing so up until April 2022? Alternatively, maybe they aren't putting patients at risk, because they've been bravely working in a high covid environment for the past year and a half (you probably even clapped for them once), and are probably more immune than most people, including the triple vaxxed who needed a booster to boost the safe and effective vaccine that now has close to zero efficiency against Omicron, yet which these nurses are being required to take 🤣
  18. It looks like they first introduced this Figure in their 16th Dec document... https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1041833/20211216_OS_Daily_Omicron_Overview.pdf In the latest one, they updated the figures but didn't update the wording 🤣
  19. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1042543/20211220_OS_Daily_Omicron_Overview.pdf
  20. England hospital units may close as staff revolt over jab mandate, says NHS leader https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/dec/20/england-hospital-units-may-close-as-staff-revolt-over-jab-mandate-says-nhs-leader It's certainly an interesting pandemic, where we can dispose of potentially 10% of the NHS workforce during it. Questions for Savid Javid, to be tabled by a competent MP (if such exists): - Do these people probably have some kind of immunity already, having worked in a high covid environment for the whole of the pandemic? (Have you even bothered to check?) - Do they have to test regularly? Do they wear masks? If so, what's the problem? Masks are effective, right? - If not, are vaccines perfect? If not, then why are you sacking people, while the vaccinated can still pass on the virus? - Why are these staff a concern, but only in APRIL 2022? Why not NOW, or JULY of last year?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.