Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FallingAwake

  1. Some of the links may be tenuous, but some of the figures are directly connected to the lab leak idea, and they didn't even declare a conflict of interest. And remember, this was the paper that was then used to shut down talk of a lab leak. At a bare minimum, there are definitely conflicts of interest here.
  2. UK Health Secretary: Vaccine passports to be scrapped UK Health Secretary Savid Javid has confirmed that vaccine passports are going to be scrapped, speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr show. https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2021/sep/12/coronavirus-live-news-uk-covid-vaccine-passports-latest-updates?page=with:block-613dbe4f8f08f3a185fd938e#block-613dbe4f8f08f3a185fd938e However, I wouldn't hold my breath. It seems Europe are more keen on vaccine passports for domestic use. Here's an account of the awful (IMO) situation in Lithuania for those who choose not to be vaccinated, or can't be for health reasons: Covid Pass in Lithuania and throughout Europe: How recent vaccine mandate laws have upended my family's life https://txti.es/covid-pass/images This is quite shocking for a country that only recently escaped the clutches of the Soviet Union.
  3. I agree it's a rabbit hole and one that's not easy to go down. The "conspiracy industry" (as you imply) is dwarfed by the "military industrial complex" as Eisenhower called it. A day before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld himself said there was a TWO TRILLION DOLLAR hole in the defence budget. This is a simple fact. So whatever money the conspiracy people are making is peanuts by comparison with the kind of numbers involved at state levels. Also, you say "If the Yanks wanted to invade Afghanistan they'd have just done it." They would certainly have the military strength to invade a number of countries in the world if they chose, but they wouldn't have the moral authority (or pretext) to do so. (They are, after all, nominally a democratic republic.) This is what 9/11 gave them. They got the American people on board, along with a "coalition of the willing". It also gave them a reason to wage a "war on terror" with no definable end.
  4. Who's saying "this" didn't happen? 9/11 happened. Afghanistan happened. Iraq happened. These events have an "official narrative" as it were. What you're basically implying is that people shouldn't question the official narrative. You're implying that governments never lie... or if they do, it's small lies (to cover cack-ups or incompetence), but never big ones (i.e. deliberate action or inaction). Without a doubt, some conspiracy claims are batpoo crazy, but some of them are quite plausible, arguably more plausible than the official version. Like the collapse of Building 7, which collapsed 7 hours after the others, which looked remarkably like a controlled demolition, and took NIST 7 years to come up with an "official" story. Anyway, this is getting a bit "off topic"... but the whole Afghanistan thing is premised on 9/11, so it is related. You can't fully understand Afghanistan without understanding 9/11. Clearly we don't have the full picture anyway, since Biden is going to release that report "in six months". So at minimum there has been something to hide for over 20 years.
  5. This was a classic post from 10 years ago. It's relevant in that Afghanistan was a direct result of 9/11: https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/ The bottom line I think is, if you believe the official story, I have a bridge to sell you.
  6. True, we don't know the long term risks of covid. But we also know that miniscule numbers of children are hospitalised from it. They seem to have an advantage over it that adults don't have. This is why I'm interested to know how the children who were part of the child "long covid" studies reported on back in February or so are doing now. If they're back to health, it would show that "long covid" isn't really a big long-term issue for children who are still developing. Also, the article says... "COVID-19 can cause tiny clots to form in the bloodstream, which can clog the smallest blood vessels in the kidney and impair its function." This is interesting, because it's also what the doomsday doctor (I forget his name, Hoffe or something?) said was happening with vaccines, but this was poo poo-ed by "debunkers". How does COVID-19 cause tiny clots, but the vaccine spike protein doesn't? Is producing many trillions of spike proteins from a vaccine really harmless, while COVID-19 doing it isn't?
  7. By your application of 'antivax' here, the JCVI were antivax. In the end, they are just cautious, which is a good position to take for a new treatment where the benefits to children are, as the JCVI themselves argued, fairly marginal, and the longer term risks unknown as yet.
  8. Unless the parent wants her child vaccinated, but the child doesn't want to be. Then I guess the child is Gillick incompetent or something?
  9. Teenage Boys Six Times More Likely to Suffer Heart Problems from Vaccine Than to Be Hospitalised from Covid, According to New Study https://dailysceptic.org/2021/09/10/teenage-boys-six-times-more-likely-to-suffer-heart-problems-from-vaccine-than-to-be-hospitalised-from-covid-according-to-new-study/ Here's the link to the original Telegraph article, but since it's behind a paywall, the above link quotes extensively from it: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/09/teenage-boys-risk-vaccines-covid/ I guess Joe Biden didn't get the memo.
  10. Curious that in Greek, the root word for sorcery and pharmacy are the same word, i.e. in the book of Revelation, ch 18: "For your merchants were the great ones of the earth, and all nations were deceived by your sorcery [Greek pharmakeia; literally drugging, enchantment]"
  11. Die Stadt teilte auch mit, dass es insgesamt bei ca 10% der geimpften Personen zu auffälligen gesundheitlichen Störungen gekommen sei, "im Wesentlichen in Form von Herz-Kreislauf-, Atemwegs- und neurologische Störungen". The city also announced that about 10% of the vaccinated persons had experienced noticeable health disorders, "mainly in the form of cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological disorders". Yikes. Edit: OK, it's 10% of the 90 people, not 10% of the entire city. I misread this part.
  12. If anyone ever wondered why Trump called CNN "fake news", the above headline nails it. Of all the wonderful things Ivermectin has done for the human race, they sum it up as "horse dewormer". Would be a good description of CNN news reporting, though.
  13. Layperson's translation: "Take your third shot when we authorise it (and we WILL authorise it, even though we have "no plans" to do so right this nanosecond), or we'll commence the boot-stomping-on-your-face phase again until you comply." For further reference, see: Australia.
  14. "one of the most respected agencies in the world, the FDA" 🤣
  15. Yeah, it's pretty clear from the data, from reading individual VAERS reports and from anecdotal evidence, that the vaccine is killing or injuring some people, and this isn't widely publicised because they don't want to scare people off. Coronavirus itself is also killing or injuring some people, so I have no problem if people choose to take a vaccine that reduces their risk of dying or getting seriously ill. However, the case for kids is different, as the JCVI pointed out. The risk factor is a lot different, and so I presume the high IQ parents who've all taken the vaccine will be factoring this in very carefully, weighing up the evidence. Innit.
  16. FOIA Release: Fauci Funded Construction Of 'Chimeric Coronaviruses' In Wuhan https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/massive-foia-release-proves-fauci-funded-wuhan-research-construct-sars-related Quick summary: - Fauci said they weren't doing "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China, to make coronaviruses more transmissible to humans. - Turns out, through Freedom of Information requests to National Institutes of Health (NIH), "Fauci-funded EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit headed by Peter Daszak, was absolutely engaged in gain-of-function research to make chimeric SARS-based coronaviruses, which they confirmed could infect human cells." I look forward to seeing this reported on the BBC later today. So the story so far... Fauci funds research from 2014 to 2019 for gain of function of coronavirus to infect humans, at Wuhan. Then in 2019 there is a worldwide outbreak of a coronavirus which is traced back to Wuhan, which leads to rapid vaccines based on technology partly funded by Fauci, which leads to mass vaccination campaigns, which leads to vaccine passports where a certain part of the population are "locked out" of the economy, as Victorian (Aus) premier Dan Andrews puts it. Anyway, it's probably all just coincidence. Please continue with your regularly scheduled programming.
  17. In the end, the "only the thick are unvaccinated" is a slur based on an anecdotal. Not really worth wasting too much keyboard time on.
  18. Don't forget to add this to the list... Global Vaccination Summit (12 September 2019) https://ec.europa.eu/health/vaccination/ev_20190912_en ... and their "TEN ACTIONS TOWARDS VACCINATION FOR ALL" (a few excerpts, my bold)... - Promote global political leadership and commitment to vaccination ... to protect everyone everywhere through sustained high vaccination coverage rates. - Ensure all countries have national immunisation strategies ... in line with progress towards Universal Health Coverage, leaving no one behind. - Tackle the root-causes of vaccine hesitancy, increasing confidence in vaccination, as well as designing and implementing evidence-based interventions. - Harness the power of digital technologies, so as to strengthen the monitoring of the performance of vaccination programmes. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/10actions_en.pdf Perfect timing for the coronavirus pandemic.
  19. Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Also, how are your colleagues in the anti-vax JCVI these days?
  20. Source: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/09/third-under-40s-england-have-still-not-received-one-covid-19-vaccine-dose This seems to be at odds with government headline statistics, which says that 88.8% of people aged 16 and over have received at least one jab. See: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations (go to "Latest reported vaccination uptake" and click on "Data"). How on earth can that chart come to 88.8%? Is the population really skewed that heavily towards older people?
  21. Not much point in debating, when the government have basically said, "this is what we're doing regardless (subject to Chris Whitty's approval)".
  22. They'll switch to that policy once 70-80% of the population are jabbed so they can introduce segregation passports. If this happens, it was never really about "zero covid" but about coercing the population to get vaccinated so they can introduce vaxxpasses. We'll see whether this is merely a conspiracy theory, or a spoiler alert.
  23. This graph just looks like a random spread of deaths after the vaccine. Perfectly coincidental 😆
  24. So basically, unaffordable housing becomes even more unaffordable, and the Express cheers this on. Is this a fair summary?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.