Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

FallingAwake

Members
  • Posts

    1,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FallingAwake

  1. Yeah, it's pretty clear from the data, from reading individual VAERS reports and from anecdotal evidence, that the vaccine is killing or injuring some people, and this isn't widely publicised because they don't want to scare people off. Coronavirus itself is also killing or injuring some people, so I have no problem if people choose to take a vaccine that reduces their risk of dying or getting seriously ill. However, the case for kids is different, as the JCVI pointed out. The risk factor is a lot different, and so I presume the high IQ parents who've all taken the vaccine will be factoring this in very carefully, weighing up the evidence. Innit.
  2. FOIA Release: Fauci Funded Construction Of 'Chimeric Coronaviruses' In Wuhan https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/massive-foia-release-proves-fauci-funded-wuhan-research-construct-sars-related Quick summary: - Fauci said they weren't doing "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China, to make coronaviruses more transmissible to humans. - Turns out, through Freedom of Information requests to National Institutes of Health (NIH), "Fauci-funded EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit headed by Peter Daszak, was absolutely engaged in gain-of-function research to make chimeric SARS-based coronaviruses, which they confirmed could infect human cells." I look forward to seeing this reported on the BBC later today. So the story so far... Fauci funds research from 2014 to 2019 for gain of function of coronavirus to infect humans, at Wuhan. Then in 2019 there is a worldwide outbreak of a coronavirus which is traced back to Wuhan, which leads to rapid vaccines based on technology partly funded by Fauci, which leads to mass vaccination campaigns, which leads to vaccine passports where a certain part of the population are "locked out" of the economy, as Victorian (Aus) premier Dan Andrews puts it. Anyway, it's probably all just coincidence. Please continue with your regularly scheduled programming.
  3. In the end, the "only the thick are unvaccinated" is a slur based on an anecdotal. Not really worth wasting too much keyboard time on.
  4. Don't forget to add this to the list... Global Vaccination Summit (12 September 2019) https://ec.europa.eu/health/vaccination/ev_20190912_en ... and their "TEN ACTIONS TOWARDS VACCINATION FOR ALL" (a few excerpts, my bold)... - Promote global political leadership and commitment to vaccination ... to protect everyone everywhere through sustained high vaccination coverage rates. - Ensure all countries have national immunisation strategies ... in line with progress towards Universal Health Coverage, leaving no one behind. - Tackle the root-causes of vaccine hesitancy, increasing confidence in vaccination, as well as designing and implementing evidence-based interventions. - Harness the power of digital technologies, so as to strengthen the monitoring of the performance of vaccination programmes. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/vaccination/docs/10actions_en.pdf Perfect timing for the coronavirus pandemic.
  5. Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Also, how are your colleagues in the anti-vax JCVI these days?
  6. Source: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/09/third-under-40s-england-have-still-not-received-one-covid-19-vaccine-dose This seems to be at odds with government headline statistics, which says that 88.8% of people aged 16 and over have received at least one jab. See: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations (go to "Latest reported vaccination uptake" and click on "Data"). How on earth can that chart come to 88.8%? Is the population really skewed that heavily towards older people?
  7. Not much point in debating, when the government have basically said, "this is what we're doing regardless (subject to Chris Whitty's approval)".
  8. They'll switch to that policy once 70-80% of the population are jabbed so they can introduce segregation passports. If this happens, it was never really about "zero covid" but about coercing the population to get vaccinated so they can introduce vaxxpasses. We'll see whether this is merely a conspiracy theory, or a spoiler alert.
  9. This graph just looks like a random spread of deaths after the vaccine. Perfectly coincidental 😆
  10. So basically, unaffordable housing becomes even more unaffordable, and the Express cheers this on. Is this a fair summary?
  11. Another interesting question is: why are there currently only mRNA vaccines potentially available to this age-group? What about the more traditional types of vaccines? Why are they still not available for this age group? It seems there was a "warp speed" to get this mRNA technology out there, but less so with more traditional vaccine routes (which is part of the reason for my own caution as well).
  12. But it does kind of show the hypocrisy of governments. Amazingly, within days of 9/11 we "knew" Bin Laden was behind it, orchestrating from a cave in Afghanistan two impressively flown planes into the Twin Towers to cause THREE buildings to collapse, and another "plane" into the world's most guarded building, the Pentagon (travelling so fast you can't even see it on the footage). Yet if (and I say IF because we can't "know" until the report is released) the Saudis had a hand in this somehow, Americans weren't allowed to know for "national security" reasons. No, it's for political reasons. The Bushes were friends of the Saudis. This is what I mean by hypocrisy. It's "national security" when they want it to be.
  13. And then... Children could override parents’ decision on vaccines, says Zahawi https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/sep/05/vaccine-passports-to-be-required-for-nightclubs-and-mass-events-in-england "Nadhim Zahawi, the vaccines minister, said parents of healthy 12- to 15-year-olds would be asked for consent if coronavirus jabs were approved for their children – expected to be pushed through by ministers this week. But he added that children could override their parents’ wishes “if they’re deemed to be competent to make that decision, with all the information available”. In my opinion, the best way to test their competency would be to give them a quiz on the JCVI's decision not to recommend vaccinating this group, and the reasons behind it. If the child can fully understand the JCVI's decision, I'd say they're Gillick competent
  14. The 20th anniversary of September 11th is coming up? He panders to those people who really care (i.e. the victims), and then six months later another redacted version of the documents get released, but it isn't big headline news because it's no longer a 9/11 anniversary. Otherwise why wait six months? Why not just release them NOW?
  15. Like Barack Obama promising to close Guantanamo Bay within a year of his executive order, which then got quietly shelved, I'll believe this when it actually happens. It'll either get quietly shelved, or the release documents will still be redacted. They need the six months to decide how much black ink to buy.
  16. February 7th, 2021. No plans, until they have plans. Won't do it, until they do.
  17. Jabs not recommended for most 12 to 15-year olds https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58438669 Well, congratulations to the JCVI. I genuinely thought they would cave to political pressure. I think their decision highlights that its politicians who are primarily behind the "warp speed" desire to vaccinate children. Of course, the JCVI left a way for the government to go ahead anyway, but at least parents and their children can be fully informed that the science on the safety for this age group isn't there yet.
  18. UK decision on Covid jabs for children expected imminently https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/sep/02/uk-decision-covid-vaccines-children-expected-imminently "The education secretary, Gavin Williamson, said on Thursday he was waiting “with bated breath” for the JCVI’s verdict, which although advisory is seen as crucial to the government’s decision on the issue." Just in case they say no
  19. Did you watch the video Dr Doom posted earlier? The two women in the video were pro-vax (one being a GP, if I recall). They were both double jabbed, and recommended the vaccine to adults, but were appalled at the idea of their children receiving this vaccine potentially without their consent. Maybe you want to find a new sub-label for these people, although I appreciate that would complicate your worldview.
  20. Speaking with my conspiratorial hat on, it would perhaps depend on the level of "regulatory capture". For example, large amounts of FDA funding come from the drug companies themselves. Drug companies may have some influence over the NHS, but maybe not to the same level. I don't know whether what I've said about "regulatory capture" is true or not, but it would help to explain why the NHS have found cheap alternatives, but the FDA don't seem to be aware of any. I've already pointed out, they can't issue an Emergency Use Authorization if there's an alternative method of treatment. Also, the vaccine companies have already made their money here in the UK, since 89% of the adult population are vaccinated. They're not anywhere close to this in the US, hence the focus on the 3 approved vaccines (in the US that's Pfizer, Moderna and Jannsen) as the sole treatment for covid... although they have also approved a drug.
  21. If they don't use it they can sell it at half price. So the Taliban have basically been handed at least $40 billion.
  22. Good video. Pretty terrifying statistics. Everybody should watch this.
  23. What's going on in Japan with Moderna? That's the FOURTH now... Japan finds another Moderna vial suspected to contain foreign substance https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/japan-finds-another-moderna-vial-suspected-contain-foreign-substance-2021-09-01/ TOKYO, Sept 1 (Reuters) - Japan reported a fresh contamination case involving Moderna's (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccine, the fourth such incident in less than a week, threatening to slow the country's sputtering inoculation campaign.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.