FallingAwake

I agree. It needs clipping.

A hob nob.

Surely "poverty" should be related to whether or not you know where your next meal is coming from. * * The choice of whether or not to use Uber Eats doesn't count.

Precisely. So at least in my book, they're still trialling it. On the masses.

On the contrary, the covid vaccines were the most trialled vaccines in history. Billions of people took part in the trials.

More 'isms' are almost never the answer.

They're not a monopoly, though.

There should also be a Netflix tax, because I insist on making the entire nation pay for the development of Too Hot To Handle. /s

Yet he managed to get "billionaire", "presenter of a popular reality TV show" and "President of the United States of America" onto his CV. Can't all be down to his good looks, surely?

That's great to hear. So then, the BOE can safely raise interest rates some more, to hit their medium inflation target of 2% 👍 Plus, since inflation has massively overshot for the last year or two, they need to massively undershoot to balance things out in the medium term. We'd need several years of 0% inflation for them to reach their MEDIUM term mandated target.

Someone's got to staff the UK headquarters of the CCP.

Congratulations, you are winner of the "Bizarrest Ending to a Post" Award 2024.

Conversely, nobody is saying that "the only thing that matters is people vs dwellings ratio".

Because some people on here believe that the only thing that significantly drives house prices is credit. Stuffing millions more people into a country has no effect, apparently.

Stop Press: Person Caught Believing a Politician.

OK, I'll play devil's advocate's devil's advocate, and assume that Earth is not flat.

Also happy to go first or second. I don't mind. I'll leave that up to you, since I don't even know what I'm playing

[note to self: What have I let myself in for here?] Uhh, sure. I'm game.

My rule is the "So What?" rule. So it's a [insert belief here.] So what? "So it's a Flat Earth. So what? How does that affect this pint I'm drinking?"

So based on this, how does one determine that the jab was "safe for pregnant people or those considering getting pregnant"? After the trial, did they say to women, "only have the jab after you're 3 months pregnant, because that's as far as we've tested it?" I'm genuinely curious. Or did they just say, "safe for pregnant women." If so, that seems pretty reckless.

Wasn't New Zealand one of the "Zero Covid(tm)" testing grounds?

It's OK, printing money worked for the Roman empire. Edit: Also the Germans.

I think you'll find it's 32.4% actually.

Yes, I'm sure Michael Gove formed his opinion, "a significant body of judgement that believes that the virus itself was man-made," based on Bitchute 👍

Nice little subliminal there :P