Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

IAS29

New Members
  • Content Count

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About IAS29

  • Rank
    HPC Poster
  1. Mmmmm.... When I've read what he actually said, he's referring to quarterly growth rates. Given there are 91.5 days each quarter this year, 1 day lost arguably equals 1.1% lower productivity for Q2 compared to Q1 - and 1.1% higher productivity for Q3 compared to Q2 -hence the "zig-zag". On the other hand, lost productivity from the public holiday will be offset by additional hours worked in lieu, and additional spending to celebrate (or avoid) the Jubilee, so MK's statement is still a load of b o l l o x Dumbed down? - not me, hopefully
  2. There was an additional bank holiday in 2011 for the Royal Wedding, so HTF does the Diamond Jubilee bank holiday make a difference when comparing 2012 GDP to 2011 GDP? Is it just me being dense here? If not, why isn't someone challenging him on this point? :angry:
  3. That will be a very serious issue
  4. Could be worse than ex-council - the previous owner might have been buried alive http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-16218344 http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-30844378.html
  5. The more "serious" outdoor types tend to go to either Cotswold, Ellis Brigham etc, or shop online (much of the more specialist / technical equipment is only available through the internet). Black's market is more the casual / occasional outdoor enthusiast. I suspect they've lost a lot of their business to Go Outdoors, who cater for both markets, with better choice and prices than Blacks.
  6. It's Blacks Friday http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15885776
  7. Here's some advice.... Don't tell your office colleagues that you own physical gold
  8. Ah, but are 2010's years the same value as 1930's years??
  9. If when when not when if not is not when not if. Work that one out suckers
  10. There's more to life than work at any time of life, if you have money, innit
  11. IAS29

    Is It Worth It?

    The exact words that went through my mind when I saw the thread title.
  12. Press Release Release Date: August 9, 2011 http://www.federalre...y/20110809a.htm For immediate release Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June indicates that economic growth so far this year has been considerably slower than the Committee had expected. Indicators suggest a deterioration in overall labor market conditions in recent months, and the unemployment rate has moved up. Household spending has flattened out, investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector remains depressed. However, business investment in equipment and software continues to expand. Temporary factors, including the damping effect of higher food and energy prices on consumer purchasing power and spending as well as supply chain disruptions associated with the tragic events in Japan, appear to account for only some of the recent weakness in economic activity. Inflation picked up earlier in the year, mainly reflecting higher prices for some commodities and imported goods, as well as the supply chain disruptions. More recently, inflation has moderated as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their earlier peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee now expects a somewhat slower pace of recovery over coming quarters than it did at the time of the previous meeting and anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover, downside risks to the economic outlook have increased. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations. To promote the ongoing economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013. The Committee also will maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability. It will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ these tools as appropriate. Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action were: Richard W. Fisher, Narayana Kocherlakota, and Charles I. Plosser, who would have preferred to continue to describe economic conditions as likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period. 2011 Monetary Policy Releases
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.