Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

The White Horse

Members
  • Content Count

    317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About The White Horse

  • Rank
    HPC Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don't think this is all it's made out to be. Unless there is has or will be a radical change in the remit of the housing associations they will do not opt to rent to those with the highest ability to pay but rather those with the greatest need. I think the policy of being able to introduce market rents is been aimed at those existing tenants whose financial circumstance may have improved and therefore rightly IMO should pay an appropriate rent. The author seems to disapprove of this if you click a link on the article where he advises people not to tell tenants of the LHA their financial circumstances. My understanding the the right to buy is only at present being trialed in 3 LHAs at the moment. I also don't get why this would ring the death knell for private rentals. There is not net increase in houses being provided but even perhaps the opposite when rental stock is taken from the market by right to buy.
  2. I often read this forum as a way of measuring the sentiment towards landlords (a term that I hate by the way). I can understand the frustration of people against landlords and the dysfunctional housing market. Many property owners are fortunate only by the date of their birth and the timing when they first bought a house. The hatred towards landlords is truly palpable on this forum and TBH it's probably not worth the stress of posting but I feel that sometimes a little balance is needed. I have indeed used some finance through the use of BTL mortgages to finance my position but have always adopted a risk averse attitude towards this and endeavoured to reduce my debts as soon as possible. I am not over-leveraged for a number of reasons - I don't use letting agents which saves 10 to 12% fees. I have taught myself a number of new skills in plumbing and general maintenance. I can fit kitchens, bathrooms, plastering , fencing etc. It's a full-time job. I have bought properties that have needed a lot of repair or needed redeveloping. I bought and sold at the right times. I keep a careful eye on finances. Timing is the of course the most important factor but no-one has a crystal ball. The difference between a landlord who owns outright and one who is highly indebted might be measured in hours of sleep over the next few months or years. I think we have all come across those highly indebted a88holes who do have a superiority complex because a bank has lent them money to buy a rental property or properties. This is IMO doubly irresponsible on behalf of the banks and the landlord. The market has become far too bloated and is an accident waiting to happen. I believe that nearly a third of mortgage approvals are now in the BTL market but 40% of all house purchases this year were made in cash, so an exact estimate of its impact is difficult. It must have an impact and I think that it is right for the B of E, chancellor and other institutions to be worried about this. The government has been instrumental in fueling market demand without addressing supply issues. I haven't purchased a house for a number of years. Is the system unstable - yes. Are highly leveraged landlords fools - perhaps depending on when they decide to exit the market. With respect to your last point, of course being highly leveraged in the present market is very dangerous to everyone involved and should rightly be curbed. Is it a Ponzi scheme - looks that way now. Perhaps the biggest question is what the feck will the government do about the housing shortage? Finally I would add that renting rather than buying is appropriate for many people. PS Minsky seems popular now since the financial crises and the movement towards more Keynsian ideologies. Unfortunately, a trait of economics is that it is fantastic as a tool for explaining why things have happened but pretty crap as a predictor.
  3. No, I do not accept your explanation because you edited your post almost immediately. Why would you not leave it and then add the explanation? You clearly meant it.
  4. No mention of Dexter in the post you changed. So clear for anyone to see that you have changed it, why?
  5. By watching a drama involving a serial killer in action? You mentioned it was a direct consequence of our exchange of posts yesterday evening. A threat is a threat.
  6. Oh, it also seems that you removed the direct threat to me........
  7. Was it me because you must not forget that I have a Jesus complex and will rise again.
  8. No, your original post explicitly implied that you had a fantasy linked to you killing someone.
  9. So you have now edited your previous post where you mentioned that you got relief from watching Dexter and a bit where he kills a redneck? You are one sad individual who is very quick to make historic quotes from this website to randomly support your arguments. Ultimately no one really gives a flying one about anything you or I type but you are something else. Go away with your threats and grow up.
  10. So you get your relief from watching clips of serial killers in action?
  11. That's not how it works as you are not depositing the full £6,000 in the first month. You are limited to making a maximum £500 contribution to the account each month but interest is paid at 5% on an account balance that eventually adds up to £6,000 in the last month at which stage the interest rate will revert to a very low level.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.