Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Caligari

New Members
  • Content Count

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Caligari

  • Rank
    HPC Poster

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • About Me
    information
  1. Interesting article "Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation " Christopher Booker http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html This Climategate scandal has only just got going IMHO
  2. My issue is with Hypocrites, duplicitous politicians and thieving and bankers. Perhaps you like those types of people...they tend to annoy me a little bit. Mr Ted
  3. It's not about Market Forces If Market Forces ruled then the banks would have gone bankrupt last year, but suprise suprise!!! the government (with our money) bailed them out! It's about globalisation and intergrating the UK into the European superstate They want to sell it to a Dutch company This is why Mandelson is so behind it Free Markets mean "Bail-out the Bankers and Punish the Posties" Eventually the same forces will come for your business Perhaps in the shape of exhorbitant green taxes.
  4. It's about the EU, it's about Globalism and breaking up national intitutions. It's all about Mandelson, and his cohorts, breaking up the Post and selling the profitable parts off to the Dutch (nothing against the Dutch BTW). Expect more strike to be provoked by management, expect the Uninions to take the bait. Services will get worse and worse, in the end people will demand that the Dutch take it over. IMHO the BBC (love them or hate them) are next in line once the Royal Mail has been "done".
  5. To understand what the dispute is about you have to separate the Postie's objectives from the government's objectives. The posties (CWU) have a short term plan, they want better/fairer pay and condition (whether you think they deserve this or not is up to you). The government and the management of the Royal Mail are implementing a longer term strategy to destroy/break up the Royal Mail and sell it to a Dutch company. This is being spearheaded by Mandelson in order to further integrate the UK superstructure into the EU superstructure. The Postal service will gradually be reduced in quality and reliability (yes it will get even worse)... the Union will be provoked into more strikes.... more rural post offices will be closed down etc etc etc. Eventually when people have lost all faith in the Royal Mail, and all their nostalgia/emotional attachment have been destroyed... then the Dutch company will cherry pick all the most profitable parts. By that point Prime Minister David Camoron will probably have reneged on his promise to give us a referendum on the lisbon treaty, and will be fully behind the Dutch deal. He will probably say "It's good for Britain" or some such drivel. As an interesting side note people keep talking about The Royal Mail being in trouble because emails have replaced letters... this is true.. However!!! They leave out the other side of the equation and that is the fact that more people are now shopping on-line and having the goods delivered to them. Less letters are being sent... but... more parcels are being sent. Run properly, Royal Mail is still a viable business/service. It is being deliberately run down and destroyed in order to merge us with the EU system, weather you hate the Union or the Management, this is the long term goal. Who thinks they're going to succede?
  6. Caligari

    Labour Government

    Good story Thanks a lot I enjoyed that!
  7. Greg Dyke is a fully paid up memeber of the agenda Remember Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Or as Vladimir Ilyich Lenin put it..."The best way to control the opposition is to lead it." "They" always give you both sides of an argument.
  8. Scary stuff thank god we stopped that in its tracks....
  9. Protests and marches do nothing Just Imagine If all of the people in the Anti Iraq war march simply went to their bank account London and withdrew their savings for a day or two... they would have brought the government to it's knees. You could call it "The Northern Rock Tactic" Create a bank run instead of marching and chanting slogans All future protests should be organized bank runs
  10. The new Fascism is not Nationalist it is INTERNATIONALISM Don't buy into the old Nationalism = Nazism That is a common mistake or trap people on the Liberal side (like Me) fall into Remember Nationalism in this coutry helped fight Hitler Nelson Mandelas ANC, African NATIONAL Congress Ghandi an Indian Nationalist against British Internationalism If Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel... Internationalism is the first
  11. Great to see so many people waking up to the truth Interesting times we live in There is no left, there is no right. It is simply a control system, guiding us inexorably toward an endgame determined by our elites.
  12. W 2 21 30

    asks time?

  13. Caligari

    Queen Elizabeth Ii

    How dare you question "Her majesty" You are entitled to your beliefs but you must realize that your beliefs are worthless. The Queen is a lovely person Stop asking questions about what "Her majesty" owns, or controls or influences... it is not your place. This is what the word "Majesty" means a. The greatness and dignity of a sovereign. b. The sovereignty and power of God. c. Supreme authority or power: the majesty of the law. d. Stately splendor; magnificence, as of style or character: the Parthenon in all its majesty. That means she is better then you How Dare You question her you Peasants!!! you are entitled to your beliefs but kindly keep them to yourselves so that the rest of us "Subjects" do not have to hear them. By the way way this is the definition of "Subject" as far as it concerns you... learn it and SHUT UP!!!! 1. One who is under the rule of another or others, especially one who owes allegiance to a government or ruler.
  14. The National trust is a magnificent scam, just like the Crown estate. Get the plebs to pay for the Elite they think doesn't exist, Plato wrote about it. By the way Camerons great-great-grandfather Sir Ewen Cameron, London head of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, played key roles in discussions led by the Rothschilds with the Japanese central banker (later Prime Minister) Takahashi Korekiyo concerning the selling of war bonds during the Russo-Japanese war. Although for some reason I quite like Cameron
  15. As far as the teaching/indoctrination debate goes you may find this book interesting. Bertrand Russell - The Impact of Science on Society This book published first in 1951 gives an important and rare glimpse into the minds of the elite and their ultimate goals. See if these excerpts sound spookily like the present time. page 50 “Diet, injections, and injunctions [a command, admonition, etc.] will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.†Page 51 - Selective Breeding "Gradually, by selective breeding the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."" Page 54 - Scientific Dictatorship "After all, most civilized and semi-civilized countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship." Page 103-104 - Bacteriological War, Population and World Government "I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people's. However, I am wandering from the question of stability, to which I must return. There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority. All these methods have been practiced: the first, for example, by the Australian aborigines; the second by the Aztecs, the Spartans, and the rulers of Plato's Republic; the third in the world as some Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia... Of these three, only birth control avoids extreme cruelty and unhappiness for the majority of human beings. Meanwhile, so long as there is not a single world government there will be competition for power among the different nations. And as increase of population brings the threat of famine, national power will become more and more obviously the only way of avoiding starvation. There will therefore be blocs in which the hungry nations band together against those that are well fed. That is the explanation of the victory of communism in China. These considerations prove that a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government." Page 105 - Necessity of World Government "The need for a world government, if the population problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on Darwinian principles." Page 110 - Elite Preservation of Power "A society is not stable unless it is on the whole satisfactory to the holders of power and the holders of power are not exposed to the risk of successful revolution." Page 113-114 - World Army & Massive Upheavals "My conclusion is that a scientific society can be stable given certain conditions. The first of these is a single government of the whole world, possessing a monopoly of armed force and therefore able to enforce peace. The second condition is a general diffusion of prosperity, so that there is no occasion for envy of one part of the world by another. The third condition (which supposes the second fulfilled) is a low birth rate everywhere, so that the population of the world becomes stationary, or nearly so. The fourth condition is the provision for individual initiative both in work and in play, and the greatest diffusion of power compatible with maintaining the necessary political and economic framework. The world is a long way from realizing these conditions, and therefore we must expect vast upheavals and appalling suffering before stability is attained. But, while upheavals and suffering have hitherto been the lot of man, we can now see, however dimly and uncertainly, a possible future culmination in which poverty and war will have been overcome, and fear, where it survives, will have become pathological. The road, I fear, is long, but that is no reason for losing sight of the ultimate hope."
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.