Maynardgravy

???

+1 Not buying a Nissan Micra for 50 grand. Not buying overpriced tat for many hundreds of grand. ... and I have half a mil at my disposal. It's a bubble. Bubbles burst.

Just popping to the toilet whereupon a log shall 'price release' from my rectum.

It's new to my lifetime.

Chunk on HPC about 22 mins in.

That same approach seemed to fool the French and worked for Macron.

That would have a modicum of relevance if it weren't already happening to fulfil the Tory wet-dream of cheap labour and more debt-drones. May did sweet FA as home secretary, she's gonna do sweet FA as PM. Where would you rather the money went? Building stuff or into scum LL back pockets?

This thread is like the film 12 Angry Men. It doesn't matter how ridiculous the whole chemical attack propaganda narrative becomes, there's still a core of posters who just cannot swallow their pride. So it always comes back to 'Putin bad man', 'Russia bad'. Play the ball, not the man. Let it go, our governments are beyond corrupt.

Nah, May will create another diversion by declaring war on Mongolia for possessing Yaks of mass destruction.

Fair enough, but looking 500 - 700 million years down the line is a bit optimistic seeing as we are barely 200,000 years into our species and all our leaders appear to be psychopaths. Still, I wonder if house prices would have crashed by then? I hope you've cleared that plagiarism with TheWig.

We struggle to get to the moon. We haven't even been to Mars yet. Planets outside our solar system will take thousands of years to get to unless we invent some radically different form of propulsion. None of this will beat the problems of population growth on Earth.

Then the lunatics are running the asylum. We have a choice: population control by design or by nature. I'd personally vote for the first party (of any colour) promising a population cap. It's that important.

You're right on the money there. I caught the end by accident and it was particularly intentional - guy even talked about being cautious of a pending downturn, but Phil hoped to persuade him to buy anyway. C@ck. Turned out that our Phil was right all along and prices never fall.... so don't get ideas plebs, buy or else.

I think a borderless world is a surefire way to destruction. We have areas of the world that are using Europe as an overspill for their own reckless breeding programs often perpetuated by religious beliefs. Population control decisions have to be taken at a national level. Decide what the optimum population of your country will be and enforce it - even if there has to be a gradual decline to get there. Trying to control a borderless world will just lead to wars of the like we've never seen before with mass migration waves fighting for resources. We're on the precipice as it is. Sure, have an international body to help poorer nations to get a grip on population control - I dunno, maybe the UN can do something useful for once.

I am sure the following Tory party will be rubbing their hands at all that new family silver they can sell.

What do you think this is? HTB 40%

Agree with that, but the narrative will change. 'Escape to the Country' will become 'Escape with your shirt' 'Homes under the Hammer' will become 'Landlords under the Hammersmith Flyover'.

But sir.... he started it. You post the same shit time and again, expecting a response and you got one. Suck it up.

Same old post from GrumpyTwat ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Sounds like the latest song by those two loony Nationwide singing sisters. Does it end "...but it's our home..." *smile*.

Maybe we can have a house price diminuendo or rallentando.

The crux of the ad for me was the '£30k going to private landlord...' for the HMO. That's not accidental. I think Corbyn wants to steer HB completely away from the Private rental sector. That will mean a quick and massive council building programme.

I never said he was innocent but I can't believe anyone thinks that he acted alone, surely? Like in his own words - he was a 'patsy'. If you fancy a good laugh though, take a look at this MSM documentary that explains Kennedy's head was blown off by accident by a hung-over CIA agent. I guess they new nobody was buying the narrative and thought they'd concoct an even dafter story based on protecting the American public from the CIAs general ******wittery. You couldn't make it up... oh wait: (from 1 hour twenty in) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiTerJXQMK4 So just ignore it and it will go away. I think you have the same attitude as the US government. Sorry - it aint going anywhere: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 Thank goodness there are still some decent people out there willing to fund some proper research to get to the truth. 'Project Summary This is a study of the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) at 5:20 P.M. on September 11, 2001. This building was a steel-frame office building located north of Vesey Street in the World Trade Center Complex in New York City’s Financial District. The World Trade Center Complex opened on April 4, 1973, and, at the time of completion, the featured Twin Towers (WTC 1 and WTC 2) were the tallest buildings in the world. WTC 7 was later completed in 1987. Other buildings in the complex included the Marriott World Trade Center (3 WTC), 4 WTC, 5 WTC, and 6 WTC. Consider that on the morning of September 11, 2001, two jets were flown into WTC 1 and WTC 2 in a coordinated act of terrorism. At 8:46 A.M. Eastern Time, American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the north face of WTC 1. At 9:03 A.M., United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the south face of WTC 2. Soon after, these two buildings collapsed, WTC 2 at 9:59 A.M. and WTC 1 at 10:28 A.M. These attacks killed 2,753 people. It is reported that falling debris produced structural damage to the remaining buildings in the World Trade Center Complex. It is also reported that falling debris from the collapse of WTC 1 caused damage to WTC 7 and that fires ignited by debris from WTC 1 burned for nearly 7 hours in the building. At 5:20 P.M., this 47-story building also collapsed. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) opened an investigation into the collapses of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 in August 2002. NIST released its final report on WTC 7 in 2008, finding that the fires that were ignited by falling debris from WTC 1 caused the collapse of WTC 7. Independent researchers, however, have assembled evidence that has raised profound questions regarding the notion that WTC 7 collapsed because of fire. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth provided funding to the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) to evaluate if fire caused the collapse of WTC 7 and to examine what may have occurred at 5:20 P.M. on September 11, 2001. Therefore, the UAF research team evaluated the structural response due to the reported fire. A structural framing virtual model of WTC 7 was used to conduct the study. The reported failure was simulated using three-dimensional finite element computer models of the building. The research team studied the building’s response using two finite element programs, ABAQUS and SAP2000 version 18. At the micro level, three types of evaluations were performed. In plan-view, the research team evaluated: 1) the planar response of the structural elements to the fire(s) using wire elements; 2) the building’s response using the NIST’s approach with solid elements; and 3) the validity of NIST’s findings using solid elements. At the macro-level, progressive collapse, i.e., the structural system’s response to local failures, is being studied using SAP2000 with wire elements, as well as with ABAQUS, and it is near completion. The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.' ...which has been in the case of 9/11 Unanswered/Ignored questions (I don't concern myself, know or even care about the moon landings etc. nor do I concern myself with aliens or flat earth BS). But all debate has been quickly closed down by the MSM concerning 9/11. The official narrative has been torn to shreds and only blanket denial by those who run the media prevents most people realising the truth. But 9/11 will be like JFK one day where most will realise the narrative is all horse shit but I'm hoping more people will be a lot more angry. But don't worry folks - we got our 'War on Terror'. Anyway, this thread is supposed to be about Agenda 21 which is something I don't know enough about, but knowing what I do know, doesn't sound too implausible.

Ask yourself what Soros wants. - so no.