Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mistermark

  • Rank
  1. Personally, I might, if everything else stacked up. In many European cities, it's perfectly normal for families, including the middle classes and the wealthy, to live in apartments. Where IMO it largely goes wrong in the UK is that most high-rise apartment buildings contain only apartments and not the communal (indoor and outdoor) spaces that Le Corbusier envisaged when he developed the 'cities in the sky' concept on which they're based. Some years ago I lived in one of the three high-rise towers in the Barbican, and with its grounds, lounges, library, cultural centre etc I'd say it was perfectly suitable for families - or would have been, had the local state schools been any good...
  2. Back in the mid-1990s I owned a number of BTL apartments, studios and 1-beds, close to the City which I rented to recent graduates who'd just got their first jobs in banking or law but weren't ready to buy. With blue-chip employers and middle-class parents willing to gift a deposit and underwrite the lease, it was good business - especially because the yields were 10-15%, when the mortgage rate was maybe 8%. Around 1999-2000 I sold them all because they'd risen in price so much that the yield was now around 5%, which was less than the mortgages would have been if I'd been on 100% loans, so they looked fundamentally overvalued to me. I was wrong . As we all know, both rents and house prices continued to rise, albeit that the latter rose faster than the former, to the point that if I'd been insane enough to still hold them in 2007 the yields might have been down to around 3.5%. But you can see where I'm coming from: fundamental value means buying properties where the rental yield exceeds the cost of capital. Right now, I can get BTL loans at around 5%, by the time the arrangement fees are factored in. But I don't want to buy on the basis that they'll stay at that level for long. The long-run average cost of capital is probably about 7%, so I'm trying to hold off going back into the market until I can buy units that generate at least a 7% net yield (by 'net' I mean after void period, letting agent's fees and ground rent/service charge if applicable). Many of the so-called BMV intermediaries send me details of properties they claim offer anything from 8 to 13% yields, but when I look in more detail these are based on a very rosy view of the gross rent they might have achieved at the peak of the market. As we all know, rents have dropped due to oversupply. So what I'm thinking is this: do I buy units now that have a 5% net yield, and bank on the rents rising as the economy hopefully recovers, so that they eventually return at least 7% of the purchase price per year, or do I keen holding off in expectation either of house prices falling further or of rents rising without prices going up in tandem, so that my 7% target can be achieved?
  3. I'd like to buy one of these, for my own use. I see one-beds being worth £200-250k and two-beds £300-350k. If anyone has one to sell, or knows of someone that could be interested in selling one at this kind of pricing, please let me know.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.