Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

southmartin

Members
  • Posts

    771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by southmartin

  1. I'm sure none are perfect, but you've just made my point: Your screenshot shows BNP in p3 at 4.22%, and the next nearest (of the big 3) is conservativehome.com at p5 2.37% - even lower is the conservative party a p15 1.09% - (total 3.49% across 2 sites) and as labour , lidims and ukip don't even make it to that top 20 (the lowest of which gets 0.86%) then I'd think it's highly unlikely that the three of them would get the 0.76% needed to all club together and 'beat' the bnp...

    Ergo, BNP website more popular than 'the big three' put together, verified by Alexa, and now Hitwise....!

  2. Do you have a source for this, covered by peer review. Also it just proves my point ?. Judging by actual votes cast the BNP would be over represented

    by a massive amount if they had website views above the major groups.

    Sure, alexa stats (most relied upon reporting organisation):

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://bnp.org.uk

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://conservatives.org.uk

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://libdems.org.uk

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://labour.org.uk

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://ukip.org

    (it's ranking by popularity - so lower numbers are better - e.g. google will be no.1, facebook no.2 etc etc

  3. Burglary, rape and violent attacks on people of colour.

    The majority of recorded rape attacks by a single ethnic group, are commited by young muslim males - I bet you won't find that on the BBC though will you!

    http://bnp.org.uk/2008/03/racism-cuts-both-ways/

    “To put it as simply as possible: if you wanted to draw a police profile of the typical racist murderer in Britain in the seven years covered by the IRR report, he would be forty times more likely to be non-white than white.â€

    Open your eyes, the white people of this land are more likely to be victims of racism. Though you wouldn't know it from listening to all the 'well balanced' immigrants (though to be fair, they're only well balanced because they've got a chip on EACH shoulder)

  4. :rolleyes: Both far right, both protectionist, both anti-immigration.

    They are the far right alternative. Just like I grouped Plaid & SNP for the nationalists.

    I think we need to be fair here - saying "far right" is a media trick to get people thinking they stomp around with jackboots making swastickas in their spare time

    The truth is that on some things (like immigration, law & order, the right of the individual to defend themselves) the BNP (and UKIP) are both on the right of the political arena - maybe even 'far right' if you will..

    But when it comes to social protection, nationalisation of the corrupt banks and the UKs infrastructure (roads, railways, gas, electirc & nuclear etc) they are very far on the left...

    Whether this left & right wings then make a sensible centre party is for you each to decide! - guess we'll find out next week (popcorn at the ready)

  5. well, last time i checked UKIP had a little bit more to their manifesto than a staunch commitment to ****-bashing?

    i think you'll find the only "*****" they want to bash, are those ones who like to wander around our cities with rucksacks full of home-made C4... and frankly, I'm all for that!

    Plus, as 've said before, simply calling one party 'racist' is a bit of 'four legs good' from the media - the fact is that if you define racism as given preferential/worse treatment to a particular group based on it's race, then ALL parties are to racist to a degree - (Labour anti-white racists are the worst of the bunch IMO)

    So it's all about where you draw the line in what you consider to be acceptable to your own conscience...

  6. Er no, not really.

    Comparing polish plumbers to the Somme, really is taking the piss and pretty disrepectful to your grandparent's generation.

    Please don't put words into my mouth - I am well aware of the circumstances that led to WWII thank you, I'm also aware of the very real gratitude of the Poles for us (eventually) coming to their aid in '39 - But if I wanted to live in Poland, I'd move there, not import their nation to overrun our rich history.

    I was comparing the eastern European nations such as Bulgaria, Romania, and god forbid Turkey (if and when) but they're not the big problem.. the big problem are the Afgans, Somali's Iraqi's etc who easily cross into those territories, and then are helped all the way to our shores as those other nations (France in particular) that know we're a soft touch and can get us to deal with the problem.

    The Geneva Convention (that all EU states are signed up!) states that refugees MUST be offered sanctuary in the FIRST safe territory they enter... so why do they come through 8 or 9 of them to get to us?

    The British nation, it's history and hard-earned identity is being erased, and moron's liek you won't see it until it's too late. Well hope you enjoy living under sharia law!! Don't say I didn't warn you.

  7. While I dislike the EU as much as the next rabid HPC'r it should get noted more often that the original aim of having European politics was to avoid us invading each other and it has done that job remarkably well.

    Er no, not really. We've been invaded, it's just that no shots (so far) have been fired as this invasion is subtle one, thousands of migrants walking slowly into the land each month, instead of hundreds of thousands in tanks

    The end result (unless it's stopped) wil no doubt lead to a war, though it'll be called a civil one, rather than a world one

  8. Exactly ;).

    Yes, and anyone who has owned or managed a company will know just how easy it is to "massage" the monthly figures by the simple expedient of omitting some of the sales and/or purchase from that month and adding them to the following month's figures. Of course, this will come out in the wash over a few months and will not affect the overall trend, but, if the lenders are playing that game, they can take it in turns to put out a positive report between them every few months.

    Does anyone else think that this being the last Monthly report before June 4th, may have something to do with it??

    Surely our feckless leaders wouldn't massage figures for electioneering???

    ;-)

  9. Hi all

    I'm thinking of diversifying some savings into shares, and want to make sure I can make instant trades without the need for a broker.

    I see people like Motley Fool do things that might be suitable, but as i'm a newbie to shares, I thought I'd ask advice to see if there's any particular system that people trust and recommend

    Thanks in advance

  10. +2

    harrogate.mate offered £265k on a £275k place with a 40% deposit(is this thread jsut full of dumbf*** stories) bank offered her a mortgage at £200k ;)

    Who in their right mind offers only 15k over the stamp duty threshold? she's getting stung for the leap from 1 - 3%, by my reckoning an extra 5.5k – she'd be better off buying at 250, but sending a large brown envelope before she arrived

    (Bet it happens in Westminster anyway!)

  11. Oh - sheitey - I hope I haven't scared him off!!

    I'm just pi55ing about m8 :-)

    Hello

    Don't worry - i'm not mortally offended by not being the first person to sum up the position - but I did genuinely make the eyebrows link on my own - honest! - i'm just gutted that someone else also made it back in 2004!!

    Is it still Plagiarism if I solemnly promise it was conceived in my very own grey matter?? Honest guv!

    Anyway - I wonder if there are any history buffs out there who can delve back further in town to see if the link persists? If so I wonder if we could start an e-petition on the Downing St website to wax Darlings head! (I believe you still can get veet on expenses yes)

  12. Hello everyone.

    Thought I'd share with you, the results of my analysis into the economic situation.

    After literally minutes spent pouring over financial records, projection charts, questioning leading economic theologians, and attempting to navigate the mire of political chicanery. I have come up with what I believe is the most comprehensive report on the current situation, and a reason for it:

    Situation: "We're all fooked"

    Reason: Chancellors with dodgy eyebrows always cause economic woe. Darling, Lamont, Healey....

    Can someone get him drunk and shave them off? maybe the market will bounce afterwards!

    (Hey, it's as scientific and as well researched as the claptrap coming from the banking 'experts!')

  13. Hello everyone.

    Thought I'd share with you, the results of my analysis into the economic situation.

    After literally minutes spent pouring over financial records, projection charts, questioning leading economic theologians, and attempting to navigate the mire of political chicanery. I have come up with what I believe is the most comprehensive report on the current situation, and a reason for it:

    Situation: "We're all fooked"

    Reason: Chancellors with dodgy eyebrows always cause economic woe. Darling, Lamont, Healey....

    Can someone get him drunk and shave them off? maybe the market will bounce afterwards!

    (Hey, it's as scientific and as well researched as the claptrap coming from the banking 'experts!')

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information