Rain'ard
-
Posts
2,426 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by Rain'ard
-
-
You don't think he has it mind when he goes on about planning laws, he has it mind of allowing his farming friend to sell off a bit. One doesn't know if members of the rural community are giving him "free range" of their Pot Bellied.
-
Anyone who tries to take my bus pass away will have their ****ing shirts ripped off.
-
Gentrifiacation, is paying £3 .50 for a bowl of cornflakes, More Gentrification is pay £5.50 for a bowl of cornflakes around the next street
-
Good grief
The only thing most current oldies fought for was their maximum allocation of BT privatisation shares.
But they doid it when they were younger. I'm not saying they are perfect because they do like voting against their own interest as I found with my elderly neighbours last May
-
What a poor excuse for a human being this man Wilde is. So he want's to deny an older persons entilement by hoping they will die off to prevent them voting Tory or wish the get dementia so the are mentaly incapable of exercising the democratic right to dispose of the bastards. And so he can save a few pence on his puny tax contribution. This is his thanks for them saving his scaggy neck fighting for democracy which he only values to degrade
-
The Production Manager at my last job earning in the mid 40's (in the Midlands) with a company car (all fuel paid) lived in a council house. He would complain about being skint all the time, considering his rent was about £90/week makes you wonder what he spent his money on.
Made me pretty annoyed so I can't say I am too disappointed by this move. I am not a Osbourne aficionado but he is convincing me he knows where the p*ss is being taken in the welfare system and is finally doing something about it.
So have we got to put up with ill thought out Shi*te because of your boss.
I had a boss in a similar circumstance that doesn't make me alter my opinion of housing charges or political interference. But you make a fair point, things seem senseless sometimes -
My take on this that the Tories no nothing of real life. Great ideas as these and satisfy done but the types that fit into the category pinched faced curtain peeping NIMBY Daily Mail readers.
It seems no in depth study or research has been done. I don't know if you can call bubbled sector of the economy "Market value"
Choices for me now living in H A property
Go on benefits pay nothing
Not expand my self- employment business to pay my current rent
Exercise my rent to buy sell at FMV to a BTL land lord
Most of the thing despised by some of the `principled' members on here since the board was conceived. I remember well how many were craving for a Tory Government only to be presented with a self serving ideological driven devils that naturally do not care about housing difficulties for the young or honest worker
-
Now the election is out of the way and no chance of blaming Labour for the rise of interest rates. The bank of England have no choice now to take off the lid. Looks like the next housing crash could be posible. The third under the watch of a Tory Government. I so glad the blues got back in
-
The choice was C&O or Mr Poo/Balls
C&O were saying/doing the right things.
Since the internet age all their lies are there to see though.
Will anything change at the forthcoming election....No.
hence why it's time to get out/prepare for the worst/buy a house, you choose.
They didn't suceed in whiping it out then
-
It is a well known fact that the people that care for the young and the old are some of the worst paid in all industries......in working class families they tend to care for their own for as long as are able, they are far less likely to shove them into nursing and old peoples home IMO........one reason why the cap of £72k is there to help the rich.....£800 a week in a care home would quickly extinguish most peoples savings entirely..... The wealthy therefore get to keep most of theirs over any cap.....I don't believe in a cap, if you have it pay for it, end of.
Thank you for your reply. I have just met someone today who corrected me on the local cost of care, which is not £800 per week, but £1500. She also said there is a good section on the BBC website regardind the Direct Payment element of Social Care funding in next April 20016. This person who's job is to advise on wills and trusts to "Examin the small print"
care
-
That's great! Put it on my tab along with everything else.
By you I mean all of us. But my wife is in the line of work that deals with this very thing and unlike me she has been trained and updated on what is to come. The issue is not only costs and who pays, but what is value for money. The cheapest elderly care al private is about £800 per week in my area and suport at home will be down to about five minutes a day, One has to beware of simplstic solutions offered by political spin masters.
-
So, who should pay?
no doubt it will be you of course.
-
Yes, I have suggested that many times on this forum. Flat rate tax on all earnings over a personal allowance that is the same regardless of income. Fair, simple, difficult to avoid.
Good Idea Bruce. Reminds me of what Peter Hain used to say on Question time when he was a Liberal
-
Couldn't agree more, but that's not what Dave and George have been saying recently.
I am afraid the revised Health and Social Care Act comming in later this year will deminish George's recomendation
Has anyone ever studied it? I have only been told parts with all it's complexity and it don't feel many on here will be very happy.
Not clever enough, unfortunately, to expain here, best look it up yourselves. One thing though. Social Services will have much more power to get in your wallets
-
From UKIP's website
That will really push up availability and affordability. It is much cheaper to build on greenfield sites, and the land is less of a health hazard for young families than a polluted brownfield site.
Seems more like a Boomers wishlist to me.
Err Tories, tories,tories
-
Well it wont be long before they start hiring at 11, Come on Tories we can re open a few pits and sweat shops and have neo Industrial Revolution. All the globalist can come flooding back with their orders and investment. Britain will become Great once again.
-
Last time I walked out of M&S empty handed, I'm afraid it was nothing to do with the weather. It may have been due to the fact that they didn't have anything that appealed to me or they dropped the line that pleased me. Times I came out thinking I had wasted my time
-
They already have, it involves politicians 2nd homes being exempt.
If anyone in the Labour Party had an ounce of common sense all theyd have done is created a few new bands for the council tax.
A good point
-
Ah, a luvvie and his temper tantrum. I bet he normally voted Labour as well. Can't have them using his money, only other (little) peoples money will do to implement the socialist ideal. Bless.
As I understand it. You imply that a labour supporter who becomes offended by a policy that effects him personally, hypoctically takes a Tory point of view condems himself as a hypocrit. Do we conclude then he is ultimately slimy. But nature or choice? Lets not forget that GRJ comes from an Oxbridge background
-
I think we could have a sticky thread dedicated to Ed on the Politics forum
Here's another contribution
Ed jogging......
As the Germans say, "How did zey ever vin ze vaw?
He would need a lot of air-brushing his photos. You would think Dave would share his experience. I don't buy into this ugly really it's childish and does nothing to better an argument
-
Fatchers fault
No Fatcher's legacy
-
Rent controls, if they bring that in we'll be completely fecked.
As per usual the Labour offered solutions are pure Ingsoc/South America BS.
Why?
-
How many Landlords were there when Labour won power in 97 and how many in 2010?
Don't know, There was't a register
-
The big tobacco companies poor??? How come they consistently pay some of the best returns anywhere on the FTSE to their investors?
There was me thinking it was just because so many of us refuse to become drugs barons, so the demand side is reduced leaving all the more profits for those who are happy to profit from pure evil.
Not them, They will pass the burden on to the consumer not the share holder. Or shorten the cigarette for the same price by lengthening the filter tip, The same way they can pass on duties
Dimbleby Seems To Think Lower House Prices Is A Good Thing !
in House prices and the economy
Posted
Oh Left wing Vegetarians like Adolf Hitler or is it antisemitic just to utter his name? I wonder if he was a nasal winger whilst he was not being Right Wing