Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About thehowler

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

3,055 profile views
  1. Just looked at the online Gruniad front page. The word Brexit does not appear. End of an era. There's no economic collapse, no 20-mile truck queues, pound is roaring. No political movement to rejoin, next GE is years away and I personally think the collapse of the union stuff is overstated. Suspect the summer will bring a raft of travel/trade hassle stories but I think we're over the precipice I'm checking out, will touch back in December to see how the year went. Fair winds to all.
  2. Andrew Bailey (BofE) sounding miffed on this answering questions to MPs. Clearly some feel the EU are being provocative. Ref only... LONDON (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said post-Brexit moves by the European Union to require banks to justify why they are not moving activities away from Britain were of “dubious legality.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-bailey-idUSKBN2AO209
  3. Some Europhile pundits understand that EU can't expect concessions on NIP to necessarily link to the mood around the TCA - or UK requests for action on NIP for that matter. NIP is a separate, standalone and special case.
  4. You think the UK govt negotiated tirelessly for the city? Not my view. I also don't buy the future intentions line, it was the same thing we heard on state aid and LPF. It was baloney. Can understand why EU are doing it, their stated aim has been more autonomy around finance so no surprise. I just wonder if a bilateral deal would be more beneficial in the long run.
  5. Yes, but also accusing her of breaking ministerial code. Your comparison might be more apt if you selected a serving and former Brit PM. These people hold/held the highest political office, which again contributes to the importance of the story, in my view.
  6. Could have gone for equivalence and then worked to get a bilateral deal with the city.
  7. Yep, EU trying to grab as much as they can via their equivalence delays, nailing their colours in desire to be a competitor.
  8. Like I was saying. Hard to get at the truth of the story with all the linking to Brexit/indy ref and quick dismissals. If only it wasn't the former leader of the SNP making the charges. He doesn't strike me as a leaver. Or much of an 'English nationalist"... Riddle me that.
  9. EDIT TO ADD: Unfortunately much of the Salmond reporting has fallen into proxy legacy arguments around Brexit and whether Scot independence is an inevitable disastrous consequence of it AND partisan views of camps either side of the Scot ref debate. This tends to detract from the issue of the Scot inquiry and why the two most prominent SNP politicians of recent years are at loggerheads. Witness the odd line of questioning in this newsnight piece...minute 1.25 and again at 2.37, "would you like to see him vindicated?". I imagine it will all go back to court and judges will direct the inquiry again on what evidence is publishable.
  10. I'm puzzled by Salmond - what does he want to achieve? I don't see him as a unionist stooge. I suspect there's a realignment of power looming within the SNP, question is whether it happens before the current Parliament dissolves.
  11. Pound at €1.17...the vaccine show has given the UK a bit of a strut. Will it scramble to €1.2 in March? Brexit negatives seem to have impacted - from reporting, anyway - more on relatively affluent/niche and specialist biz/people in arts/sports/erasmus/language students/au pairs and seafood. I think there'll be a bigger impact on majority of Brits via travel hassles and broad prices of goods as we come out of lockdown. Thus far I don't think many people have noticed much of a change in their weekly shop/bills. But away from the different health emergency approaches - contested - there's also been a complete absence of any Brexit benefits. And not much on the horizon, other than the OZ/NZ deals we might get towards the summer.
  12. UK has agreed to extend MEP ratification process of the TCA until end of April. No fanfare - I think Frost said it was "disappointing". I read trade pundits today saying some in the EU are miffed about UK govt constantly misrepresenting/blaming the EU for the hassles of the TCA. But away from the NIP - which I view as a special, standalone agreement - now that the shellfish ban is settled I don't see the UK govt blaming the EU for anything. They seem disinclined to mention the EU at all. EDIT TO ADD: too many EU watchers don't understand that the NIP is not the TCA, they conflate the two.
  13. Scot politics story has to burst soon, maybe at a Salmond presser tomorrow. I know Scots unionists/Tories are milking it (and the timing of the doc on Kennedy being hounded in his last election contest is noted), but the court action last week with Lord Justice Clerk Dorrian ruling the statement could be published, and then the moves today to redact it, are just bizarro. Salmond is not going gently and that can only mean that one of the First Ministers - former or current - has to fall.
  14. Strange goings on in Scotland this morning. Crown Office - who Salmond in published testimony says is not fit for office - have told Scot parliament to withdraw and redact his published testimony. Some are saying they're doing this as it means the inquiry won't then be able to cite/include it in their findings. Escalating.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.