Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum


New Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About chandellina

  • Rank
    HPC Poster
  1. i'm with you - i was a believer for a long time in the impending crash but meanwhile all i have to show for it is a massive increase in the rent i have to pay. unfortunately my partner is still convinced prices will fall in five years or so and would prefer to pay more in rent than mortgage in anticipation of the eventual bargains. i'm 36 and really fed with moving every year and living with other people's crap furnishings. i don't think i'd mind if we could find a decent place to rent and stay there, but that hasn't happened and we've moved 5 times in 5 years for one reason and another.
  2. i think it's ridiculous to think there is some sort of conspiracy among journalists, particularly as the property beat isn't exactly the stomping ground of the profession's highest paid members. i know many a poor hack either mortgaged to the eyeballs or drifting through their 30s in a shared house. just like many others...
  3. even tinier "designer" flats here: www.abito.co.uk
  4. response from ING economists, with prediction of house price fall: We remain particularly concerned about the prospects for consumer spending given increasingly gloomy evidence from retailers and a growing probability of a house price correction (we look for a 10% price fall in 05), which will negatively impact on consumer sentiment. The BRC recently reported that the Christmas trading period was the worst in a decade while consumer borrowing appears to be on a slowing trend. The situation will deteriorate further if, post election, the government has to either curb its spending or
  5. the dip was slight month on month but said to be the worst performance in decades for the xmas period. BRC-KPMG retail sales monitor table of data Same Store Total Dec -0.4% +2.5% Nov -0.2% +2.4% Oct +0.5% +3.0% Sep +2.0% +4.6% Aug +0.6% +3.2% July +1.8% +4.3% June +2.4% +5.0% May +3.7% +6.5% Apr +1.9% +4.9% Mar +1.
  6. but xmas retail sales sucked, so people are slowing down with the spending and borrowing.
  7. for sure, it was a ridiculous episode, and by no means represented typical buyers. I couldn't see why they didn't just rent - aged 23 and 26. Surely one or the other will have a partner at some point relatively soon and want the other one out but not be able to afford to buy their share. I thought the flats they showed all looked poor value for around £300k - especially the one they bought. There seem to be plenty of comparable 2-bed flats for around £250k in Islington. Key rule when sharing a flat - avoid getting bedrooms next to eachother, as there will be no privacy. I imagine the wal
  8. does anyone know why pre-nups aren't upheld? what's the point of having one at all then?! i'd also like to defend womankind and say that... not all divorces are instigated by women not every woman is looking to take a man to the cleaners plenty of dads don't pay a bit to support their kids plenty of women support their partners/husbands peace.
  9. whoa. it looks shallow (and is, the way they've surveyed it). but if you think about it for a moment, there is nothing strange about wanting to own a place to lay your head and to support a family. In both the most primitive and the wealthiest of societies, having a sturdy home is a symbol of hard work and success. it also is basic that women would want a man with property - indicating stability and a place to raise children.
  10. and parts of the u.s. too! hence, millions of uninsured people.
  11. i don't reckon. isn't the income tax rate 22% up to £31,400? in the u.s., comparable rate for that salary at current exchange rate is 27%. factor in state - and city - taxes somewhere like NYC or in California and national insurance and council tax look piddling. plus, we do get something for our money in Britain - free healthcare.
  12. you are quite nasty on small points - i don't know why. you seem to really hate americans too, with your ridiculous generalisations. anyway, i didn't make a judgement on the us situation. my point is people manage (and pay for four years, not three). higher education is a bit of privilege, not so much a right, so it makes sense to me that students should help to fund its costs.
  13. ING has this prediction this morning of a 25bp cut in the spring: The UK has just released several weak figures. The December CIPS manufacturing survey has fallen more than expected to 53.7 from 55.0 in November. The market had been forecasting a reading of 54.4. Output fell to 54.7 from 57.1 although new orders rose to 55.5 from 55.2. However, the drop in employment to 48.7 from 50.9 is worrying. This takes it back into contraction territory and is the lowest reading since July 2003. It also adds to the gloom surrounding the outlook for the household sector, which is further rei
  14. I thought the article presented a very limited picture of the working life of graduates. To start, it has never been unusual for graduates to work at lowly-paid or low status jobs straight out of uni. Even traditional degree subjects don't necessarily have a straightforward career path and many graduates don't really have a clue what they even would like to do. However if you look at the longer term work experience of graduates, I would wager that the majority do end up in jobs requiring or preferring university qualifications within a few years - and certainly make more money over the dura
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.