-
Posts
1,807 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Potwalloper
-
Rank
Newbie
-
Is this denile delta?
-
I've heard that brushing up on literacy skills can be rewarding.... There are plenty of books on your subject.
-
Suprising News From Audi Dealership Yesterday
Potwalloper replied to Jonnybegood's topic in Anecdotals
Good because you're in for a rafter them. Oh joist! -
Ids: Welfare System 'close To Breaking'
Potwalloper replied to leicestersq's topic in House prices and the economy
I don't see why not. All we have to do is stop feeding them quite so many chips. -
Because working in world beating industry is so non you. Learn to make films, become an Estate Agent or an Interior Designer. Whatever you do, if you are naff enough to work in industry for goodness sake call yourself an inventor.
-
Or in other words, with trembling lower lip, "Why could it not carry on? Bring back Liz Jones. Hooray Phil Spencer! Stupid is good...."
-
You do not exhibit the lateral thinking required from a good researcher.
-
Minimum Wage Effectively Rescinded
Potwalloper replied to Boom Boom's topic in House prices and the economy
Are you a web bot? -
Gordon Brown Expresses Regret
Potwalloper replied to ollie plimsolls's topic in House prices and the economy
What? Incoherent babble? -
Gordon Brown Expresses Regret
Potwalloper replied to ollie plimsolls's topic in House prices and the economy
You guys? How dissimissive! -
Dealing With Micromanagers Project Managers?
Potwalloper replied to Tin Foil Hat's topic in House prices and the economy
Tell her that the stagnant puddle of the public sector you find yourself in is about to dry out. That should do it. -
Gordon Brown Expresses Regret
Potwalloper replied to ollie plimsolls's topic in House prices and the economy
Wonderpulp, Hilltop and AZ must be on a Fabian Society nght out.... -
Or is it that you don't like what people here say, and you think "workers' rights" sounds nice, so you thought you'd say it. Can we afford the current level of state spending?
-
I get it. Because BA shrank, became an efficient and therefore a growing and successful airline for a long period of time, you assert that we need all the trappings of the nanny state that we have built up. All you're really saying is that you are sympathetic to the idea of an all encompassing and all expensive state. I admit I absolutely loathe and hate it, so I have no problem in coming up with a counter argument: we can't afford it.