Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum


New Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Timster

  • Rank
  1. The "damages" according to the landlord were that no viewings created a void period (how this can be quantified is beyond me considering the number of variables). Me quoting entitlement to "quiet enjoyment of the property" didn't wash with the adjudicator. I will have to agree with Damocles (reluctantly :o) that even though I have read widespread that my statutory rights overrule this particular tenancy clause, it is obviously no guarantee I wouldn't lose part of my deposit.
  2. The landlord only "acknowledged" my follow up which was not enough notice so I didn't know if they would claim for a rogue month (so yes, the notice was acknowledged by the landlord's wish to show viewings, but I was still never clear if it was "in time"). The unpaid rent was taken from the deposit and in fact the scheme acknowledged this so there was about £500 remainder in contention. I didn't dispute the unpaid rent, just the remainder. Their website says: "Unlike the formal legal system, schemes are not governed by ‘precedent’ in the same way as the Courts. Decisions are made by the Schemes on the principle of ‘balance of probability’. Decisions are made based on the submission of evidence from both parties." However, whatever they say, surely them quoting the tenancy clause without consideration to the enforceability of said clause is wrong?
  3. My Deposits has just awarded 2 weeks rent because I refused viewings. I've read in so many places the clause in the tenancy agreement was unenforceable (yet the adjudicator quoted it). Basically the landlord was a complete *** so I felt morally justified. I also refused to pay the last month's rent because the landlord didn't acknowledge my notice (as stipulated in the tenancy agreement). I just feel the adjudicator was being thoroughly lazy as they basically said "the remainder of the deposit goes to the landlord to compensate them for potential loss of earnings, I cannot adjudicate any further". Any advice from experienced members?
  4. Quick question. The prescribed information pack contains a page for landlord and tenant signature. What is proper practice with regards to this page? I currently print a copy of that page and have myself and the tenant sign both whereby I keep one of them. Seems a bit naff to do it this way. Any advice?
  5. By the way, thanks Flopsy. Much appreciated. I've now gone to two separate solicitors both of whom have said the case isn't complex enough for them to take on (eh?). Basically, the best chance is to compromise with the landlord.
  6. OK, the landlord is being "nice" trying to offer suggestions to remedy this without committing to anything, but nothing more. I guess I have no choice but to move in. Damocles / anyone - can I sue to have this agreement voided? Or is it just going to be for the cost of the power shower? Having just met my neighbour (who was complaining within 5 minutes of me testing the TV at normal volume), it just adds to another reason for me not to be moving here, but I don't want to lose my deposit etc.
  7. One thing about this Damocles - if I say I will take up occupation and sue assuming I don't get what I want, isn't this acknowledging I recognise a tenancy has been created and weaken my case? Or is suing for compensation just the cost of installing a power shower unit? Thanks
  8. Thanks Damocles. I think this was my 'next move'. Although the LL used the LA for finding me as a tenant, who would I be suing if it went that way? The LL or LA? The LL is managing the property. I've had initial correspondence with the LA, but since I started to get more into the dispute, the LL was corresponding with me. Also, I was thinking of offering a sweetner of say equivalent to 1 week's rent to encourage him to opt ending the agreement and refund me deposit etc. This was more a hedge against the effort of going through a small claims court than any expectation of limited success. Cheers!
  9. Flopsy - thank you for your quick and detailed reply. That would be very altruistic of you if you were to look up papers relating to your experience. It's much appreciated. Yes, I never seem to get used to the fact letting agents tend to be habitual liars. Smile to your face, get money, then middle finger. To me this is a deal breaker, but I fear I'm too late having signed the lease. Pyracantha - My offer to the landlord was a desperate measure on my part to get him to agree to installing the shower. When he said I should have checked, I replied that in an ideal world I would have, but if it wasn't for the fact there was so many things to consider, so little time that I relied on what I saw, what I read and what the agent told me. That to me I said should have been reasonable if everyone was honest. Good call on saving the listing, I hadn't discovered that option until you said it and had only snapshotted with print screen (which I knew I could be accused of altering).
  10. I signed a 12 month lease to rent a flat. The lease started a few days ago. However, I'm disappointed because the advert said it had a power shower (verbally corroborated by the letting agent when shown around), but now after visiting the property on day 1 of the tenancy, I discover it doesn't. There were a couple of other pre-conditions that were not met that I had in writing e.g. a professional clean which was either poor or didn't happen (the letting agent has admitted so far as to say "we had used a new contractor and it didn't work out"). I have refused to move in until all these issues are resolved. However, the landlord is very reluctant to honour the power shower installation and reckoned I should have verified this personally before signing the lease (and gave expected rhetoric about how no-one before me has complained before). So desperate as I am to have reasonable pressure, I have offered to pay half of the costs to install a unit. He is now saying he'll look into using a company he knows that can check if it's possible and maybe agree to splitting the cost. However, the stipulation being I move in first before such an event occurs. This to me translates: move in first and then I won't do anything. I offered to surrender the tenancy on condition of money I had paid would be refunded. This was on day 1. The offer was ignored. Ultimately, this is what I want because in my haste to secure a flat I didn't do my homework, but I fear that won't happen. All the above I have in emails and the link to the advert on RightMove still exists (the landlord does not dispute the wording of the advert). What are my options and how likely of succeeding? I realise posting on a forum is a risky way to do things, but I'd rather start here than pay a solicitor £££s to tell me "sorry, nothing you can do".
  11. Thanks for this. Are you sure I don't have to transfer ownership of the property to my wife as well?
  12. Hi - I will be shortly letting out my house as the current occupiers have decided to move on. Does anyone have any accounting experience which can explain what needs to be down to minimise giving the profit to Gordo's money drain by using my stay-at-home wife's tax allowance ? I will pre-empt any potential attacks. I'm not a buy-2-letter and I rent too (so I'm not entirely evil). Thanks.
  13. I heard they were going to rename bonuses "retention awards". Given everyone is sh1tting themselves about not being "retained", I take it no banker will be receiving one? Wishful thinking...
  14. Positive net immigration. (Will i get locked up for suggesting that?).
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.