Tuesday, Jul 27, 2010
One rule for the rich, another for the workers
Daily Mail: Buy for £20m - and pay no stamp duty: How Candy brothers advised foreign buyers to avoid millions in tax on luxury flats
The flamboyant developers of Britain's most luxurious apartments planned to help foreign multi-millionaires deprive the Exchequer of up to £69million in tax. Prospective buyers of newly built flats at One Hyde Park in Central London, with an average price of £20million, were urged to opt for a corporate 'structure' when buying an apartment. This meant that instead of buying the property on a freehold or a lease and registering its sale price with the Land Registry, which would incur stamp duty, the purchaser would buy out the shares in a company that owns the property. These arrangements, which are not illegal, account for around 20pc of the high-end, multi-million pound property sales in London. Details of this stamp duty avoidance scheme will almost certainly concern Vince Cable....
7 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. clockslinger said...
Vince Cable and Lord Oakshot will soon shut up and conform after spending a bit more time with their betters. We know they've got plenty of potential to stand as firm as water based lubricant upon their policies of fairness and social justice, after all.
"It's not illegal" because your rulers choose not to make it so! Nor will they if they want their party donations.
2. mark wadsworth said...
Why don't they try LVT instead? People won't be able to avoid that using "a corporate structure".
3. inbreda said...
the solution in guernsey was to bump up the annual registry fee for companies by about 500 quid.
4. Hugh Counsell said...
The new apartments built by the Candy Brothers are just so ugly. What was the local council thinking about when planning pemission was granted for this development that resembles a vast cold store?
5. tyrellcorporation said...
This has been happening for years and only really works for property above about £800k (apparently). Loophole should be slammed shut IMO.
6. jack c said...
"What was the local council thinking about when planning pemission was granted for this development that resembles a vast cold store?" - maybe lots of 20's in brown envelopes
7. Crunchy said...
1. clockslinger
Spot on.
Dave has all his priorities in place to take them forward. New face old ways. How lucky! £££
UKIP was my vote. The naughty boys of the prison campus. How unlucky! 000
Back to house prices, Recaptcha - 'property trappable'