Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010
A few days old but great headline
The Sun: House prices drop £36 a day
Would be great to see more headlines like this. Especially in papers like this, the one the sheeple read.
Posted by mark @ 11:00 AM (1902 views) Add Comment
9 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. mrflibble said...
Howard Archer, chief UK economist at Global Insight, said: "We increasingly suspect that house prices will only be flat over the rest of the year."
Dream on sunshine, dream on...
2. This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.
3. mark wadsworth said...
Jolly good. Sentiment seems to be turning.
4. the number cruncher said...
It's the Sun wot did it
5. mark said...
Interestingly the SUN has always been good at making or destroying a political partys chance of power, maybe it will be a big player in pulling the property market down.
6. drewster said...
Sentiment is a huge factor. We can see how in the USA sentiment has turned against housing. The tide is slowly turning here too. No doubt we can soon expect to read more horror stories, the family who bought a BTL flat each and are now deep in negative equity.
7. timmy t said...
Whoever said renting was dead money?
8. Rental John said...
It was not so long ago - that all the tabloids ran 'houses make 'X' amount per day' headlines.....Oh those heady days.....
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/mortgages-and-homes/house-prices/article.html?in_article_id=409735&in_page_id=57
9. Tennouji said...
@ Mark I think it is rather a case of papers reflecting the views of their readership: the public/the party itself destroys its chance of power and the paper merely writes what its readers want to hear.