Sunday, May 30, 2010

Bite that bullet...oh NO...STOP

Reuters: UK at risk of double-dip, fiscal cuts should wait

"Britain faces the risk of a double-dip recession and the government should hold off making big spending cuts until the recovery is assured, according to the British Chambers of Commerce. In its latest economic forecast published on Sunday, the business lobby group revised up its projection for growth this year to 1.3 percent from 1.0 percent in its March forecast". OK folks - what should we do, I'm confused?

Posted by alan @ 01:08 PM (1568 views) Add Comment

13 Comments

1. mrflibble said...

The fundamental problem here is that in real terms the UK isn't actually out of recession. Sure, we printed £200bn and Brown saved everyone, but are we any better off for it? No, we are in worse shape now than we were in 2007. The issue seems to be that nobody wants to suffer any pain or make any loss, so instead the pain keeps being postponed and the loss keeps being socialised amongst all of us.

Those recent £6bn cuts by Osborne against a backdrop deficit of £3bn a week should tell everyone that this cannot continue. The shock and awe of £6bn worth of cuts is nothing when two weeks later the money saved has been spent again all over again.

I find a tragic than Brown's last months in office were spend blowing the last of our money at the Casino to get the growth figures barely positive. The problem now is that we are looking at re-entering the negative territory again, unless off course we do not face your demons, call up Merv 'Xerox' King and pretend all is well. Fingers crossed Cameron & Osborne are man enough to make the hard choices ahead.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 01:41PM Report Comment
 

2. holyroller said...

Now is the best opportunity the government have to try and correct the mess. Because there isn't any other point in a government where they have this amount of time before another election.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 02:35PM Report Comment
 

3. Globalisation said...

If we have double dip recession that means BOE rates will stay low for longer and decrease the chance of HPC

Sunday, May 30, 2010 03:23PM Report Comment
 

4. Sparkie said...

For the government to do the right thing and whats required would see the official unemployment figures rise to 5 million, this would take 10 years to clear in to the private sector, Cameron has 5 years. What your seeing with this £6 billion in cuts, is just a show for the press and the markets. My guess is they looked into the abyss the day they took power, and realised we are too far down the line for any possible economic u-turn which would result in Labour being swept back into power with a massive majority in 2015. There is only one politically acceptable route which Merv has embarked on already........inflate or die.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 03:49PM Report Comment
 

5. nomad said...

The Micawber principle:

"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."

It really is as simple as that.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 04:09PM Report Comment
 

6. crash n burn said...

Hasn't that £6bn saving already been spent by paying the IMF to save Greece? By my reckoning, we are an extra 2 bill down.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 04:34PM Report Comment
 

7. mark wadsworth said...

Alan, do you mean "What should we do [as a nation]" or "What should we do [as individuals]"?

CNB, yes it very much has. If you include the amount that the UK will have to pay for Euro bail out via the IMF, the total cost is £10 billion to £15 billion, so we are actually £4 billion to £9 billion down.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 04:57PM Report Comment
 

8. alan said...

Hi Mark W,
There's not much I can do as an individual...I'm swept along with the tide, just like anybody else. What about the country?

Do we cut heavily (and get a downgrade like Spain), or wait a bit (and let the debts rack up).

Either way, house prices aren't likely to go up (sorry, Daily Express).

Sunday, May 30, 2010 05:06PM Report Comment
 

9. Fitch said...

Print 167 Billion. They've already printed 200 Billion. (which begs the question - why pay taxes)
Wipe away this thing called the deficit with the swipe of a computer key. It's a all a big fraud anyway

Sunday, May 30, 2010 05:18PM Report Comment
 

10. icarus said...

nomad @3 Tell that to those who argue that government spending/deficits create demand, demand generates more spending, spending generates economic activity and growth, growth generates jobs, increases government revenues, reduces deficits and ends recessions. Whichever way you argue it's got to be less simple than the Dickens formula, which applied to household budgets. Countries which have tried to slash their deficits recently aren't exactly booming.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 05:49PM Report Comment
 

11. gone-to-colombia said...

Despite what the BCC want is there really any choice?
The government is not spending its own money.
The market will not accept and support any government that continues to spend far beyond that which it can raise by taxation.
The government´s options are running out as the overspend continues.

Sunday, May 30, 2010 06:00PM Report Comment
 

12. jack c said...

I would rather have the micawber principle than this

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1103319/Wanted-expert-teach-football--street-Never-mind-recession-boom-time-ludicrous-jobs.html

Sunday, May 30, 2010 06:03PM Report Comment
 

13. Simon said...

They will continue to devalue the pound and print their way out of it .


They need to get the entire public sector on 21st century employment contracts .

Scrap public sector pensions and replace them with something which is accessible to everyone .

Monday, May 31, 2010 12:49PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies