Tuesday, Mar 30, 2010
Is this what democracy has come to?
Telegraph: Gordon Brown could lose and still be Prime Minister
''Gordon Brown could continue as Prime Minister for weeks even if he loses the election, under Whitehall proposals to prevent a run on the pound in the event of a hung parliament.''
Posted by hpwatcher @ 10:09 PM (765 views) Add Comment
10 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.
2. stillthinking said...
Lets be clear, the run on the pound is not just due to a hung parliament, either a Labour win -or- a hung parliament, just that we will have democratically chosen a run on the pound if Labour gets back.
3. paul said...
Unless the outcome of the election is a genuine surprise, a run on the pound is inevitable. Saying that the pounds value could collapse if there's a hung parliament is also a convenient way of denying responsibility for mismanaging the economy for the last ten years too.
But of course something has to be done to "maintain economic stability" (if that erm ... also preserves MPs' property wealth then that's a bonus naturally).
The big question is: I wonder just what lengths the government may permit themselves to go to in order to "protect Britain's economic interests" in the event of a hung parliament.
Such as interfering with the democratic process ... perhaps?
4. down wave said...
Posted again for the casual reader of this blog, I posted it some weeks back. There will be a run on the £ and interest rates will have to rise, there will be no option. If you have read this previously, sorry.
Posted on Thursday, March 11, 2010 09:19AM . 24. down wave said...
>>>>>>>>>>>One should hold in mind that Football and Rugby (etc) players are opposing teams on the public field for entertainment; But in the changing rooms they are all hairy mates out to make money as they shower of the mud.
This is absolutely true of Westminster, notwithstanding each party's public facade, they are all hairy boys (and Girls now) out to make money and screw us to boot. No one party wants to inherit the poisoned financial wells and scorched earth of NU labours financial and social incompetence or the inevitable consequences shortly to unfold.
So my best guess is that as they scrub each others back to clean off the mud,
they will arrange for a Hung Parliament, so that none of them take the blame.
In this case, which now looks certain, the voters will take the blame and they
will all continue to make money, while our country descends into Bankruptcy
brought about by their soap opera dramas.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
5. uncle tom said...
In the first election of '74, Ted Heath hesitated before resigning, having polled more votes than Labour, even though Labour had more seats (but didn't have an overall majority)
The hesitation saw him dubbed as a bad loser, a reputation he never shook off.
If GB cannot be sure of forming a governing coalition by the time the last results are declared, he would be well advised to offer his resignation, although the Queen might not accept it straight away..
..if he doesn't learn from history, and lets his arrogance prevail; he might find the Libdems price for support included his removal..
(They would be well advised to demand that anyway - although any deal that would be acceptable to Labour, would inflict huge damage on the Libdems. If you look at the numbers, the Libdems holy grail of PR is something Labour could never accept, as Labour would be left with an electoral disadvantage, relative to the Tories.)
6. orcusmaximus said...
@down wave "they will arrange for a Hung Parliament, so that none of them take the blame"
I don't buy it. No MP will voluntarily give up his seat, salary and expenses so that his colleagues can dodge the blame. They would all rather keep there "jobs" and weasel out of the blame some other way.
7. orcusmaximus said...
@UT "If GB cannot be sure of forming a governing coalition by the time the last results are declared, he would be well advised to offer his resignation,"
If we learn from history, GB will not do anything which might result in him losing his post until the last possible moment!
8. mr g said...
If the sh*t really does hit the fan straight after an election resulting in a hung parliament, then it may be desirable for Brown to continue as PM for a while and take all the flak for the resulting problems.
9. orcusmaximus said...
@mr g "it may be desirable for Brown to continue as PM for a while and take all the flak for the resulting problems."
As much as I would love to see GB get his just deserts, I'd rather see the country on the way to recovery.
In my experience, the only way to get an erroneous past decision reversed is to have a change of management. No manager will ever admit to making a mistake!
So, the only way to reverse the trends of
is to have a different party in charge.
10. mr g said...
@orcusmaximus
My comment was made because I have such a low regard of Brown that I would love to see him under the cosh and squirming if things turn nasty.
However, at the end of the day, I agree wholeheartedly with your comments and the priority has to be to see the country on the road to recovery.