Sunday, Dec 06, 2009

Big bonuses are only the symptom

Sunday Times: The great RBS exodus: 1,000 bankers quit over bonus row

Adam Smith said something like "If the price of something remains inordinately high then it is not operating in a completely free market".
In other words big bonuses for banks are not the problem they are the symptom. As the article says: " Investment banks' [staff], however, are enjoying a boom in profits due to the loss of competition in the sector after the demise of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns ".

Posted by voiceofreason @ 08:26 AM (1634 views) Add Comment

20 Comments

1. Eternal Sceptic said...

Pure greed and arrogance. If bankers had been such a stunning success, why did they need bailing out? I can only assume failure is rewarded. Perhaps prisoners should be given a bonus as well, at least their reasons for incarceration were not hidden by smoke and mirrors. And lets give the unemployed a couple of million each for their inability to find a job. The list could go on. 5 million for doctors, each time they kill a patient.
I have no issue with good work being rewarded, but any bonus should be based on long term results, and paid with company shares 10 years later.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 08:55AM Report Comment
 

2. tenyearstogetmymoneyback said...

"The latest high-profile defector is Fiona Paulus, a senior corporate financier who advised Tata Steel on its takeover of Corus and the Spanish energy giant Iberdrola on its acquisition of Scottish Power."

While I have no doubt on her professional ability I reckon the country is better off without her -
unless someone has a plan to sell off the Labour party so they can wreck someone elses country.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 09:01AM Report Comment
 

3. paul said...

Yes, does anyone not see the irony that although she no doubt earned a fat fee, she was advising an Indian bargain bucket how to take over the UK's last remaining steel producer.

'Tata' is Welsh for shit by the way. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 10:05AM Report Comment
 

4. crunchy said...

2. paul I sense your comments becoming more realistic lol, but let's not forget the massive potential revenue of the soon to be attacked coal industry. All for the fluffy white polar bears that by the way can't swim???

Sunday, December 6, 2009 11:22AM Report Comment
 

5. crunchy said...

"however, are enjoying a boom in profits due to the loss of competition in the sector after the demise of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns ". and the rest.

Engineered? No way they said kicking and screaming. Keep watching further future developments and see who gains.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 11:28AM Report Comment
 

6. paul said...

Crunchy, I've no idea what you're trying to infer from 'your comments becoming more realistic' but to be honest you're a bit of a tin foil hatter dwelling in a reality I'm not sure I want to be a part of.

Anyway. Corus makes steel, not coal.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 12:20PM Report Comment
 

7. who stole my pension? said...

Let em all go. They haven't don us any favours. All they have done is left us with a massive amount of debt to pay off. They don't take risks - all the risk are for the tax payer so they shouldn't be paid any more than say a nurse. Anyway if you look at all the scandals such as Endowment miss-selling etc the whole industry is corrrupt and has done us no favours.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 01:20PM Report Comment
 

8. cyril said...

@3 - crunchy - What is the connection between bankers quitting and polar bears being unable to swim? (oh, and by the way, you're wrong about polar bears - they can swim).

Sunday, December 6, 2009 01:49PM Report Comment
 

9. Crunchy said...

5. paul said "but to be honest you're a bit of a tin foil hatter dwelling in a reality I'm not sure I want to be a part of."

That's the problem, but you are getting there, I can see it. Like it of not, it is inevitable no matter how much you have invested in their reality. Time is all it will take.

7. cyril said "oh, and by the way, you're wrong about polar bears - they can swim)"

Exactly, and extremely well too, that's why I put a ? at the end. You see some vested interests would have some thinking they are very poor swimmers to support certain profitable agendas and to play on the gullibles emotions. That's how much we are underestimated.

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/07/polar_bear_swin.html This should get you asking some questions about why Al Gore, not me, has said in the past that polar bears can't swim.

Can anyone tell me whether William Hill has a bet offer on the outcome of the forthcoming Copenhagen fiasco. I would love to make some money on everything being ramed through, regardless of recents cover ups.

Tin foil hat? Yeah right!

Sunday, December 6, 2009 03:23PM Report Comment
 

10. crunchy said...

Check back on this subject it may appear later. Pressed the wrong button. It will be worth it.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 03:26PM Report Comment
 

11. icarus said...

Although they did a lot to recapitalise the banks governments could, politically, do only so much. So they fixed the game so that a monkey in a suit could make the profits that the banks required to get out of trouble. Bonuses? Give 'em nuts and berries.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 05:19PM Report Comment
 

12. bystander said...

Literally anyone could have mae money on the markets over the past 8/9months - literally all hares went up. How on earth do these parasiotes get of demanding the bonuses, on money made of the back of my childrens, unborne children - 'talent' b*ll*cks - may they all burn in hell.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 07:30PM Report Comment
 

13. bystander said...

meant made not mae,shares not hares, parasites not parasiotes and off not of - this sure as hell winds me up

Sunday, December 6, 2009 07:32PM Report Comment
 

14. crunchy said...

11. bystander

Stay off the booze. At least what I say makes sense to some and doesn't get me banned. The ambiguities!!!??? I luv em.

Icarus, it deosn't suit you, as with the sun and water. lol

Sunday, December 6, 2009 07:46PM Report Comment
 

15. bystander said...

I've calmed down now. The vast majority of those who work in the financial services sectors do a worthwhile job, but it anoys me when I feel we are being held to ransom by this small minority, as it has in the past with strike action by numerous unions. The governments have no backbone and the financiers hold all the strings - I keep on expecting GB to break into a chorus of "I've got no strings", but even though we cannot see them it doesn't mean they are not there.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 07:59PM Report Comment
 

16. icarus said...

crunchy 12 - unfair to judge me by today's standards of aviation.

bystander 13 - don't forget that those on the other side of the class warfare game are much better organised than unions or workers' movements.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 08:22PM Report Comment
 

17. crunchy said...

14, Fewer to agree with and benefits appear to be greater old man.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 08:29PM Report Comment
 

18. markj69 str05 said...

Refreashing to see a bit of ranting going on. So how does 'joe average' express his opinion in a formal manner? I thought I heard something about a petition on the radio on Friday. Is that the only tool we have in our kitbag?
I also think it was bumbling ex-labour 'right hook' chap - Seemed to be talking some sense. Or at least his opinions seemed to be closely aligned with my own. Bucking Fanker - Let them all emigrate to pastures new.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 09:13PM Report Comment
 

19. markj69 str05 said...

Old Gordy Brown and his cronies have an awful lot to answer for. They may not have caused the catastrophy, but they certainly didn't manage and regulate (Or put into place a worthwile organisation to regulate), the people who caused it.

Gen' election in a few months - They shouldn't have a chance. What with MP expenses scandel, Large portion of UK disagreeing with Iraq/Afgan', their inability to manage and regulate key organisations that have such a huge impact on the economy, and now the fact they couldn't even manage the mopping up exercise. How on earth they caould have pumped so much money into the banks without taking/gaining any control for their actions in the short term, or long term. Irresponsible beyond comprehension. No accountability.

Not sure if Conserv's or Lib's will do any better. But as I have said before - We have to make an example of them. No individual scapegoats - Just the whole lot.

Sunday, December 6, 2009 09:25PM Report Comment
 

20. markj69 str05 said...

Scandal

Sunday, December 6, 2009 09:30PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies