Friday, Oct 23, 2009
The economists are revolting
The Times: Economists revolt over surprise recession data
Ben Broadbent, economist at Goldman Sachs, said: "While we are entirely sceptical about the ONS's data, it still matters for policymakers and markets. For all its failings, today's weak data increases the likelihood of quantitative easing in November."
Posted by devo @ 06:05 PM (1988 views) Add Comment
18 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. devo said...
Perhaps it will be necessary for Goldman Sachs to 'pre-approve' the next quarter's data.
2. letthemfall said...
Note how the senior senior economists from the investment banks and fund houses are scrambling to claim the figures will come round to their way of thinking. Ben Broadbent the figures again.
3. wiltshire said...
Or in other words, we've got an economy in this country that even off-the-scale QE can't revive.
4. drewster said...
It's hard to measure the figures accurately at major turning points in the economy. Consider the Purchasing Managers' Index: last quarter you survey 100 managers, this quarter 10 of them have gone out of business and the remaining 90 report no change. The index reports no change, but in truth there's a 10% decline.
5. devo said...
'we've got an economy in this country that even off-the-scale QE can't revive'
Funny really, when looked at dispassionately.
printy printy
6. fallingbuzzard said...
Questioning the data is the only way some of them will keep their jobs. Some were predicting +0.3% GDP growth and have just cost their clients. So they're in "protect their ass" mode.
7. cynicalsoothsayer said...
The ONS phone must have been ringing constantly over the last few days with a grumpy scotsman on the line...
8. crunchy said...
I think Goldman sharks are the most revolting of all.
"Policy makers." I wonder who that's been over the past months?
9. gone-to-colombia said...
I was listening to Radio 4 this morning, it was the on line Today show, I was reading this web site at the time. The BBC 'expert' confidently predicted a rise while I was reading the reverse. Rather funny!
10. japanese uncle said...
Huge bonus yet again in the City means more and more money is concentrated to super rich, less and less for the real economy that employs population, save nannies and servants, cooks hired by the wealthy few. How can you expect the economy to recover?
11. gone-to-colombia said...
It feels as if Britain is in some kind of ghastly dream, or a bleary hangover, where reality and dreamy hangover fight for attention.
Maybe the drug like euphoria of credit fueled spending and the feeling of being wealthy based upon inflated house prices is a better 'reality' than a long cold winter of debt.
12. markj69 str05 said...
Dream!!! - Don't you mean Nightmare.
13. gone-to-colombia said...
Yes, delete dream, insert nightmare! But you get the idea, or that's how it seems from the Caribbean
14. crunchy said...
10. japanese uncle
You have answered your own question which leads to a much bigger one, as you know.
WHY?
15. japanese uncle said...
crunchy
I don't really know. A mystery.
16. crunchy said...
JU
I respect your discretion.
17. Jacobite said...
What we have in play here is a technique called manipulation of the public perception by the main stream media, I am afraid at some point reallity will kick in. you can only fool the public for so long!
18. Ndg said...
Economic crashes, bank bailouts, rate crashes, currency panic, QE, recession blah, blah, blah......
Due process would demand that you protest this monster f()ck-up of inept national government activities via your local MP.
Or should that read inept local MP activities via national government?
Either way, letters should be sent by registered mail. Wonder what the law will dictate when this is no longer possible.
I'm sure that government (local and national) is very much 'under control'. Voters put these monkeys in power but who do they really represent? Anyone know who Tarzan is? Herr Heseltine?