Wednesday, Jul 15, 2009

UK unemployment hits 2.38 million

BBC: UK unemployment hits 2.38 million

"UK unemployment rose by a record 281,000 to 2.38 million, in the three months to May, the Office for National Statistics said.
The jobless rate increased to 7.6%, the highest in more than 10 years. "

Posted by phdinbubbles @ 09:51 AM (1520 views) Add Comment

17 Comments

1. uncle tom said...

Despite that, the markets had expected worse - the FTSE is up by over 1%...

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 09:53AM Report Comment
 

2. Brickormortis said...

Am I right in saying that if the government and banks started to reposess properties of defaulters more urgently that the UK economy would be fooooked?

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 09:59AM Report Comment
 

3. Brickormortis said...

...more that it already is? And am I the only one to get the impression that people are buying houses again because they think there is money to be made short term adn also that loads of people think its business as usual and are still going to pile their money into property investment? Shouldn't the government be trying to initiate policies to prevent these people from emtying their cash into the property market.

I tell you, I don't think the UK has leasrned its lessoN!

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:01AM Report Comment
 

4. mrflibble said...

So that's an extra 281,000 people that won't be helping the housing market recovery then - shame...

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:04AM Report Comment
 

5. hpwatcher said...

Despite that, the markets had expected worse - the FTSE is up by over 1%...

It's amazing how some people will always see something good in even the worst of news....

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:08AM Report Comment
 

6. Ftb Dave said...

FTSE rose for thid day in a row after Intel forecast sales topped analysts estimates in the US and also Rio Tinto expecting a recovery in steel demand in China. Unemployment, though bad news is already priced into expectations.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:36AM Report Comment
 

7. icarus said...

No mention here about the decline in hours worked by those still in jobs. I know that the US June employment stats showed the shedding of 465,000 jobs but those still in jobs worked on average 0.8 of an hour a week less. This loss of hours plus the loss of the 465k jobs equated to the shedding of 900,000 jobs in June.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:44AM Report Comment
 

8. ftb dave said...

FTSE is up for a third day in a row after Intel sales forecasts were better than analysts estimates last night and also Rio Tinto stated they expect a recovery in steel demand from China to continue. Unemployment is bad news but not a surprise to the market. Beating analysts estimates for demand and sales is now being priced into expectations.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:46AM Report Comment
 

9. Neil B said...

Lets all sing - "Things can only get better...."

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:06AM Report Comment
 

10. uncle tom said...

One has to remember that while exports have suffered for countries like China, there is likely to be quite a pronounced rebound now.

I don't believe the actual consumption of Chinese made goods has fallen that much, but the inventories of the importers have been greatly slimmed, and as a result, new orders dried up for a while.

Despite that, China's economy has continued to grow, and as export orders resume; their economy is likely to get quite hot again, with a big and growing thirst for commodities. India is also likely to enjoy a similar rebound in the near future.

As the east booms, the west will continue to bust. With falling confidence in our currencies, everything we import is going to get much expensive...

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:24AM Report Comment
 

11. nomad said...

"I don't believe the actual consumption of Chinese made goods has fallen that much"

Agreed UT, rock bottom IR in the west have provided a supply of spending money to buy their goods - but low IR won't last forever. China needs to encourage their internal markets with spending power - is there any sign of that happening?

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:54AM Report Comment
 

12. mark wadsworth said...

BM, "Shouldn't the government be trying to initiate policies to prevent these people from emtying their cash into the property market"

Yes, it's called Land Value Tax, which ain't gonna happen until after there has been a huge great re-education programme and every single one-sided pseudo argument against it has been dealt with.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:50PM Report Comment
 

13. fubar said...

Does anyone else have a problem with the official unemployed statistics or is it absolutely above board? No manipulation downwards? I was looking for more info on the topic when I came across some interesting sites. This one for example (apologies if its been posted before); http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article9960.html With a nice graph;




I'm sure there are others and I know what a complicated issue it is. Are the latest round of graduates mixed in to the figures yet?

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 02:44PM Report Comment
 

14. fubar said...

Sorry just realised that article is about the US. Silly silly silly. Ignore 13 - Should have gone to specsavers.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 02:46PM Report Comment
 

15. happy mondays said...

@ 12, Mark, can you explain land value tax please ? Me no understand .. but i definitely understand a re-educational programme which i agree with..

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 02:59PM Report Comment
 

16. icarus said...

fubar - it's not without value. It does show how large the gap can be between official and unofficial counts.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 04:51PM Report Comment
 

17. a saver said...

Obviously all those people unemployed, it's bound to increase house prices, they will have so much time to go out and look at houses!

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 08:11PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies