Saturday, Apr 11, 2009
A study of why repossessions happen
Calculated Risk (blog): Fed Paper on Reducing Foreclosures
1. Income multiples don't matter so much - what matters more is income volatility. People with highly volatile incomes are more likely to default. People with stable incomes don't default.
2. Banks prefer forcing repossession instead of debt forgiveness, even if it means selling the house at auction and not getting much for it. This deters people from defaulting and prevents moral hazard.
3. Negative equity predicts behaviour. When homeowners lose their jobs, if they have positive equity they sell; if they have negative equity they default.
"Loans on high income multiples were an enabler for speculation during the housing bubble, and this speculation pushed up house prices. The prevalence of loans on high income multiples was evidence of a bubble and a good predictor of a housing bust."
2 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. sneaker said...
Glimpses of the mind-bendingly friggin obvious.
I mean please guys if this is all you guys with your massive PhDs in economics can really come up with then we really are in trouble.
2. Redcellar said...
I love the fact that it takes the bubble to burst before all this 'obvious' analysis makes its way to the surface. Where were the genius' before this happened.
Only on HPC I dare say.