Tuesday, Jan 20, 2009
NAEA calls for effective market reform
mortgagestrategy: NAEA calls for effective market reform
Peter Bolton King, chief executive of the National Association of Estate Agents, says: “For years, the National Association of Estate Agents has been calling for an appropriate level of regulation to be introduced as mandatory in the UK housing market.
“I would like to reassure all of the hardworking and reputable estate agents in the industry, as well as the thousands of people considering getting onto the property ladder, that the NAEA will fight to ensure that any reform to the industry is effective." "hardworking and reputable" ??????
Posted by martin @ 07:25 PM (500 views) Add Comment
7 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. paul said...
"the NAEA will fight to ensure that any reform to the industry is effective"
Interesting use of words there. Hmm. According to the NAEA's sole definition of effective. If someone questions the effectiveness of NAEA's proposals, they are saying that they'll fight them too.
"You see this feature here, this is a Norman arch, its named after Sir Norman Lamont who used to be the Chancellor of the Exchequer of this country - that's really rather exciting, isn't it ... ?"
Hardworking and reputable? Undoubtedly ...
2. This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.
3. This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.
4. troy said...
that's odd, there's a glitch in the software
5. it_is_going_with_a_bang said...
What they really mean is they want to stifle competition in the future IMO.
Will it prevent outright fraud and bandit behaviour when it suits - Very unlikely.
There is far too much money to be made by being dishonest in property.
6. martin said...
@ troy,
stay away from the conspiratory theorists mate, sorry if you think i'm one of the VI's. You're barking up the wrong tree, dont know who your friend Martin Paul is but unless he works in the meat industry and has a different surname then he aint me mate. Having said that, if i'm gonna get berated for posting something that I consider relevant by a pr1ck, then I will stay silent. Thanks for your imput Troy. (A55 Hole)
7. paul said...
troy, can you elaborate? Are you trying to say that myself and Martin are one person? Who also has a connection with the issue and an interest which is undeclared? Or have I missed something?