Friday, Dec 05, 2008

Bailout focus

Guardian: Repossession: Case Study

Jassette Donaldson, 53, a checkout assisstant from east London, has fought for months to keep her three-bedroom house. She has been given 56 days to sell her house after falling behind with her £1,230-a-month mortgage repayments in 2005.
She is not sure if the government's repossession scheme will help her. Donaldson was unable to keep up with her mortgage after she was hit by a car and had to take six months off work. She then returned part-time.
Her house is valued at £300,000, but is on the market for £250,000. The court has given her 56 days to sell or face repossession

Posted by little professor @ 12:42 PM (734 views) Add Comment

7 Comments

1. mark said...

how can a checkout assistant cover a 1200 quid a month mortgage plus all other living expenses?

Friday, December 5, 2008 12:46PM Report Comment
 

2. little professor said...

I don't think she was a checkout assistant when she took out the mortgage - she had an accident and had to switch jobs

Friday, December 5, 2008 12:56PM Report Comment
 

3. jack c said...

Just goes to show the value of top quality finacial advice when taking up the mortgage - a combination of a suitable PHI (permanent health insurance) Life & Cic plan c/w waiver of premium and Mortgage payment protection ins (all based on "own occupation" total permanent disability benefit) and this lady would have no financial worries at all.

Friday, December 5, 2008 01:21PM Report Comment
 

4. luckyjim said...

jack c

From my experience it would 50/50 as to whether those policies would pay out. If she sneezed and forgot to declare it they would wriggle out of it.

She should have downsized when her income reduced. She would have had no trouble selling in 2005.

Incidentally - this also shows that mortgage lenders aren't trigger happy when it comes to repos.

Friday, December 5, 2008 01:40PM Report Comment
 

5. jack c said...

luckyjim - so long as the applicant declares all material facts the policies will pay out in line with the terms and conditions - such policies provide a vital safety net - it's strange though how the customer (client) see's the value after the event.

Friday, December 5, 2008 01:44PM Report Comment
 

6. Waitingtobuy said...

I like the bit at the end *valued at £300,000,but on the market for £250,000"

Friday, December 5, 2008 02:14PM Report Comment
 

7. bystander said...

Spot on Mark and Luckyjim.....another example of the media pinning the blame of the economic woes of 'many' onto the evil banks. When will people take responsibility for their own lives and actions. It is a shame this lady was injured and had to reduce her working hours, but as Luckyjim said she had plenty of time to sell for the 300K over the past three years. quote from article: "She has been given 56 days to sell her house after falling behind with her £1,230-a-month mortgage repayments in 2005". So the bank has been waiting for proper 'regular' payments for almost 4 years, I think they have been incredibly understanding.

Friday, December 5, 2008 03:00PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies