Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008
Morgan Stanley was able to make massive trades on the basis of privileged information
Citywire: Banks enjoy the fruits of their own recklessness
It is a glorious testament to the power and influence money can buy. Having almost single-handedly plunged the developed world into its worst financial crisis for more than half a century, one might reasonably expect the banks to be subject to some serious sanctions and rule-tightening from governments and regulators.But no. Nearly a year on from the start of the current crisis, senior bankers continue to enjoy the financial fruits of their misdeeds, safe in the knowledge they will never be called to account for their actions. Indeed, more evidence emerges today that the banks have been able to persuade regulators to loosen the rules even further, to allow them to make even bigger profits at our expense in the future.
5 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. whiteknight said...
It's one rule for you. Whatever they want the rules to be for them.
2. whiteknight said...
Equitable Life - justice delayed has been justice
3. Whiteknight said...
justice delayed has been justice denied
4. jack c said...
whiteknight your link to the Eq life article unfortubately isnt working - with regard to the Morgan S posting it's now really quite unbelievable that we got to the point where they could short the HBOS shares safe in the knowledge that the rights issue was undersubscribed. When is insider dealing not insider dealing? erm when the Banks decide.
5. icarus said...
It's even worse than the article says. It's 'naked shorting' - using stock they didn't own but knew they would own because of the underwriting contract. See the comments under this article http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2008/07/underwriters_short_hbos.html