Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008

More hard evidence that the crash is in full swing

BBC Business: Mortgage approvals hit fresh low

The number of new mortgages approved by the major banks fell another 23% in June to a new record low. The British Bankers' Association (BBA) said its members approved just 21,118 new home loans in June, down from 27,499 in May. The figures were also 66% lower than in June last year. The collapse in sales, and the current sharp fall in prices, has been caused by the mortgage drought, due to the credit crunch in the banking system.

Posted by jack c @ 10:12 AM (821 views) Add Comment

19 Comments

1. beartil2010 said...

and the hits just keep coming

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:30AM Report Comment
 

2. nooneo said...

The dead cat has stopped bouncing - The soft landing was a fantasy - First time buyers can neither get or martgage or are sensible enough not to buy into a falling market - And now we can no longer even hear the POP the bubble made when it burst last year.

House price crash, what house price crash?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:35AM Report Comment
 

3. mark wadsworth said...

Beautiful, this is a combination of Buyers' Strike and lending strike. Everything is falling apart most gloriously (TM John Lydon).

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:38AM Report Comment
 

4. martin said...

I know you've all heard this before but I have just got off the phone having been called by the Halifax EA regarding a house I have put an offer on (relax before you all pounce and try to beat me to death with sticks and broken bottles, the offer was 40% below asking price). My offer has been declined as it was seen as unrealistic. After quoting a few figures to them I was passed over to the "valuer", a very articulate and well informed lady who told me that they have seen no slow down in in home sales AND could help me secure a mortgage should I wish to make a more acceptable and sensible offer!!!!!

I consider myself told and corrected.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:42AM Report Comment
 

5. gardeniadotnet said...

>Everything is falling apart most gloriously (TM John Lydon).

Would you describe yourself as an anarchist, Mark?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:46AM Report Comment
 

6. mark wadsworth said...

I'd call myself a small government free market liberal, actually.

The biggest VI in this whole shambles is the government - a house price boom leads to an illusion of wealth and debt fuelled economic growth. The Tories tried this in the Barber Boom and the Lawson Boom, it didn't work then and it won't work for Nulab either.

Furthermore, MPs are also very likely to be second home owners (which is why the capital gains tax exemptions for second homes are so generous).

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:03AM Report Comment
 

7. Ten Years To Get My Money Back said...

It would be very interesting to know what would have happened if you had offered 20% less.
The fact that they didn't put the phone straight down says something.

:- Duncan

Bought 1989 £65500, Best offer in 1996 £48000.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:04AM Report Comment
 

8. layers said...

@Martin - More like being lied to and set-up! Or then maybe I'm being unfair and the particular area you made an offer in has experienced no problems - wouldn't bet the house though!

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:17AM Report Comment
 

9. mr_smith said...

yeah small governmet free market liberal is mostly a good idea. except that free markets is what got us into a lot of this mess. not that I would prefer a planned economy. small government liberalism is a good idea though....

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:17AM Report Comment
 

10. paul said...

martin, articulately point out to the valuer that according to the Halifax index, house prices are dropping at the rate of nearly 4% a month. Tell her you'll come back in six months when the sellers have become more realistic.

"Seen no slow down"? well of course she's gonna say that ...

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:21AM Report Comment
 

11. mark wadsworth said...

Mr Smith - house price bubbles result because of the LACK of free markets. If planning laws were more liberal (the carrot) and we had Land Value Tax (the stick), house prices would be low and stable.

e.g. in the 1950s and 1960s we were building 400,000 new homes a year and they had Schedule A taxation of imputed homeowner rents and Domestic Rates that more or less added up to a Progressive Property Tax (a close relative of Land Value Tax)

The result? House prices as a multiple of earnings were flat for twenty years or so.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:22AM Report Comment
 

12. martin said...

Paul,

Just had another conversation with Halifax to say that the offer I made was the maximum and would be reduced in line with their own month on month figures. Gonna do the same with a few more EA's in the area.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:47AM Report Comment
 

13. mr_smith said...

@ mw

not going to disagree with the 50s and 60s thing cos I haven't looked into it. i do know they built a lot of crap houses then 'cos I can see them everywhere inlondon!!!

wrt free markets I was meaning the excessive unregulated lending and the possibly soon to blow up derivatives market. that sort of stuff is where free markets left to their own deveces cause problems

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:58AM Report Comment
 

14. beartil2010 said...

The market is not free beacuse IRs are set artificially - the government caused the housing boom, in concert with the central bank, not the market.

'Free' markets is a misnomer - truly free means anarchy. Light-touch but enforced unbiased regulation is the necessity for all forms of free market. Unfortunately we don't have that here!

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:08PM Report Comment
 

15. icarus said...

The unregulated financial institutions which caused the mess didn't get to their size and power under free market principles in the first place.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:28PM Report Comment
 

16. mark wadsworth said...

Beartil2010 "The market is not free beacuse IRs are set artificially - the government caused the housing boom, in concert with the central bank, not the market."

EXACTLY! NULAB just copied the Barber and Lawson templates (only even more extreme).

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 01:13PM Report Comment
 

17. wally said...

My missus made an offer on Monday - 135k on asking price 170k. Rejected on the same day then yesterday the agent phoned up and tried to get a higher offer, she declined. This morning we get a letter rejecting the offer (not had that before). They just phoned back to find out if we are still interested!!

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 03:56PM Report Comment
 

18. jack c said...

Back to basics for these people I'm afraid - a house is only worth what someone is willing and able to pay - when will people wake up to this fact

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 04:45PM Report Comment
 

19. crash bandicoot said...

My mate went to see a house that was on for £270k a couple of months back. It had been on for six months with little interest. He offered the owner £220k then and there - a little naughty I know - and she practically chased him out of the house. I was thoroughly shocked, he should have been closer to £180k if he was being serious........ The EA phoned him back the other day to see if he was still interested.......

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 08:32PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies