Sunday, Jun 22, 2008

In a seller market EAs work for the seller, but in a buyer market EAs work for the buyer!

Times: A bad year for estate agents

“How about a price-reduction competition?” Last time round, with owners reluctant to trim prices in a falling market, a hush-hush incentive scheme to persuade sellers to drop their asking prices helped to keep sales turning over. Each office logged the price cuts on a confidential form, and the office and individual that achieved the highest percentage reduction on their total register pocketed bonus payments. “I like it,” the bean-counter nods, as H scowls across the room at me. “Only we need to keep it quiet. I don’t want owners knowing we’re actively slashing prices across the board.”

Posted by confused76 @ 08:59 AM (678 views) Add Comment

5 Comments

1. paul said...

The prospect of estate gaents being honest about price falls?

THE HORROR. THE HORROR.

Sunday, June 22, 2008 10:00AM Report Comment
 

2. letthemfall said...

It all goes to show that EAs have to get prices down or they will not survive. All the guff we hear about owners who don't need to sell sitting tight and keeping prices high is just another dollop of VI rubbish. Prices will stick for periods, then jerk downwards as sellers are finally persuaded.

Sunday, June 22, 2008 10:51AM Report Comment
 

3. techieman said...

This is absolutely right. There is no incentive for EAs to participate in waiting for their clients to get higher prices at the cost of turnover. Even if conditions were good who wants to wait 3 months for 2% of an extra say £10k. The only reason this works fine on the way up is because other properties are already part way through the process. When the markets reverse and sellers are in denial, resulting in the drying up of transactions the only way the EA can survive is by encouragiong more "realistic" pricing.

At the beginning the EAs have a cushion, and soome might thing its a temporary pullback. When it dawns on them that its not such a pullback EAs must become just as aggresive on the downside. I'd watch out for reductions in headline sales commissions and wouldnt be suprised at cartel like operations.

Freakonomics is worth looking at.

Sunday, June 22, 2008 11:42AM Report Comment
 

4. mark said...

amazing how the news has changed over the past 6 months

Sunday, June 22, 2008 12:19PM Report Comment
 

5. icarus said...

Which happens more often - EA pursuades vendor (a) to drop his price or (b) to maintain his price but offer a cashback or some other sweetener deal so that the price that finds its way into the monthly indices is artificailly inflated?

Sunday, June 22, 2008 02:00PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments
  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies