Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008

"Hot" money has totally distorted the "marketplace" for life-sustaining goods,

Information Clearing House: The Lords of Capital Decree Mass Death by Starvation

The so-called "market" - which is actually a club of super-rich men who distort and destroy everything of value to humanity that they touch - will be the death of us all, and much quicker than through the effects of global warming, which is also greatly accelerated by the ghoulish, greedy rush to grow food for cars rather than people. In such a murderous environment -manipulated purely for the profits of the Lords of Capital.
The men who profit from such mass murder use terms like "structural adjustment" and "economic fundamentals" to attach a veneer of rationality to a chaotic system they have created on the fly for the sole purpose of mega-theft. In the end, the Lords of Capital have mastered only one art: the production of overlapping calamities, each more lethal than the last.

Posted by malct @ 04:28 PM (407 views) Add Comment
Report Article

17 Comments

1. Hubbers said...

How many people do the Lords of Capital have to starve before they catch up with Stalin or Mao? How many before capitalism starves as many as all of the great socialist paradises combined?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 04:37PM Report Comment
 

2. cornishman said...

I wouldn't be surprised to find that a lot of the money pumped into the system by the central banks since Christmas has gone into soft commodities. Extra demand for meat from the newly rich Easterners hasn't caused the world price of rice to double in a week.

Expensive food and oil will cause civil unrest though.

Perhaps that is what is now being engineered by some group for their own ends?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 05:13PM Report Comment
 

3. mrmickey said...

If you can't bomb them in to submission try starving them.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 05:19PM Report Comment
 

4. planning4acrash said...

Hubbers. Capitalism is not 2 blame. This charade is Command and Control Corporatism. I call it Corporate Fascism. None of the bail outs and monetary expansions have anything in common with Capitalism. To blame Capitalism is to close a door on the solution

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 05:25PM Report Comment
 

5. layers said...

Wonder what the 'Super Class' are doing with their collective trillions? Not helping the 'useless eaters' (and I mean that sarcastically) that's for sure.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 05:33PM Report Comment
 

6. planning4acrash said...

Good question. What are they planning 2 do with it? Clearly, they have all they want. The only thing now is to enlarge their upper class and institute a new world order that suits their design on the planet. That consolidation is nearing completion.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 05:50PM Report Comment
 

7. last_days_of_disco said...

What nonsense. All these countries could grow their own food. Africa could be put to much better use than it is. To blame someone else is too easy. These socialists need to take some responisibility for a change (the corruption that materialist socialism causes and encourages is mind boggling -- I have seen this in action in countries like Zambia or the UK public sector).

If corporations could make Africa into a paradise, they would. A happy worker is a productive worker. The problem is, even the "Super Rich" can't solve the basic problems of human nature. Money doesn't solve the problem. Its easy to blame everyone else. Its the classical communist rubbish (Russia and Cuba are not exactly raving success stories). Its not somebody else's job to look after you, you have to work hard to provide for yourself and your family. Be prepared, be organised, be principled and trust your own judgement. Countries that encourage and reward that kind of behaviour prosper, those that don't self destruct internally. And when the world hits an economic downturn for *whatever* reason, they collapse.

Soon we are going to forget about the problems of somewhere else, they are coming to a street near you! The UK has not been encouraging that behaviour for a while.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 06:19PM Report Comment
 

8. hpwatcher said...

Great post. I blame globalisation for all this.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 06:52PM Report Comment
 

9. hpwatcher said...

@ last_days_of_disco

what was your rant about?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 06:54PM Report Comment
 

10. indiablue19 said...

OK, now here's my question. Are the industrial robber barons and captains of industry TRYING to create havoc, famine, war, starvation and armageddon? Have they attracted the Kirstie's and Phil's, The BTL maniacs, the subsidized farmers who grow rapeseed instead of food, and the rest of that gullible ilk, as part of the master plan? Or are the industrial greed mongers just completely uncoordinated and simply so stupid as to destroy the entire earth and all of us [and ultimately themselves] for no discernible reason?

[Posted this in two places, as I'd really like to engender a reply or two. Thanks.]

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 07:10PM Report Comment
 

11. malct said...

10. indiablue19 said...

OK, now here's my question. Are the industrial robber barons and captains of industry TRYING to create havoc, famine, war, starvation and armageddon?


YES

oh no they're not

oh yes they are

not

are

who needs religion when you have climate change?

oh no you haven't

oh yes you have

not

have

ad infinitum - Posted this in two places, as I'd really like to engender a reply or two. Thanks. me to!

no but seriously indiablue19 - I often wonder about this, you are right to raise the question

ultimately it leads to a mindset that we ordinary folk don't have a handle on - all that money all that power, why?

saw David Icke live last saturday - like musicians you have to see, hear people live to sus them out

imho David Icke is OK - bu@@er now what have I said?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 07:42PM Report Comment
 

12. Bangybongo said...

i think the AUTHOR is a MEMBER of the lords of capitalism. i reckon HE'S trying to stoke a mad scramble for food in the western world. he's their AGENT. the ``article'' is silly fun. to quote henrik ibsen, though: ``never under-estimate the power of the vested interest!'' the wealthy have one vested interest: staying relatively richer'n the rest of us. fair go, i would too.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 07:58PM Report Comment
 

13. planning4acrash said...

Do you not think that, in his connecting the dots process, that Icke, with his reptilian conspiracy, has stumbled upon a bogus creationist theory, which is merely about Christian Fundamentalists justifying how the human feotus has at one stage reptilian features? (Just as it has gills at a very early stage of development, etc). Just as Scientologists find that they can only justify the existence of humanity by aliens and genetic engineering if they discount evolution? I mean, look at the black lies spun to cover the white lies, why can't you see them? Coz they can metamorphose!!! It could be out of a Hollywood Film! Problem is, that it polarises people who stop questioning the system and dismiss analysis as crazy conspiracy.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 08:28PM Report Comment
 

14. malct said...

p4ac - absolutely

up until saturday when I spent two and a half hours in the same room with him and a few hundred other people I didn't know wether he was plain nuts or working for the VIs

Now I am satisfied he is genuine and basically one of us. I'm not easily impressed and very sceptical by the way.

I hate the reptilian crap as it does so much harm to conspiracy fact.

I tend towards 'them' being genetic psychopaths as in political ponerology.

If some people want to believe the psychopathy comes from reptiles then that's ok with me.

btw the weekend was dedicated to health and nutrition, 2012 and the dumbing down of the human race. - and some

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 08:54PM Report Comment
 

15. shipbuilder said...

last_days_of_disco, perhaps we should all just shut up about the housing crash and go and build our own houses - that would solve the problem and one would assume that would be the natural path of someone wishing to take responsibility for themselves and their family, yes?
Except that we can't - why not?
Of course, you know that real socialism is the workers owning the means of production, taking responsibility for it through collaboration rather than 'expecting the managers to look after them' and substituting real responsibility for a cash payout?
I think you really mean is state reliance, yet what is the difference between this and relying on a company for the money to look after your family, relying on someone else to provide your house, grow your food - shouldn't you be doing that directly yourself?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:10PM Report Comment
 

16. ttimgg said...

last days of disco, this is the dumbest post I ever saw here.

"If corporations could make Africa into a paradise, they would"

wtf??!!!! This is delusional.

"You have to work hard for your family..."

We are talking about sweat shop workers working 20 hour days. We are talking about 80year olds supporting a dozen grandchildren. We are talking about 10 year olds walking miles before breakfast, with malaria, to collect enough water to keep their dying parents alive. What's YOUR idea of hard work?

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:10PM Report Comment
 

17. Frogger said...

There is no global food shortage: There is a global excess of people.

If we refuse to control our population, nature will do it for us.
If we are at war with ourselves, we are more vulnerable to nature's ruthless killing.

If you think you are protected, living within the walls of fortress Britain, think again.

Thursday, May 1, 2008 10:57PM Report Comment
 

Add comment

Username   Admin Password (optional)
Email Address
Comments

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies