Saturday, Jun 09, 2007
Locusts!!
Guardian: Laid to waste by a feeding frenzy
"The one common theme is that the buy-to-let brigade, helped by tax breaks and easy lending, are able to outbid local first-time buyers and then, all too often, fail to maintain their properties or monitor their tenants" "we even had landlords who wrote telling us of the "obscene" profits they've made and agreeing that tax breaks should be removed" "the two flats to the council as emergency accommodation. He charges £750 a week" 750 a week!!!!! "The neighbour has lost much of its best housing stock, sold off at a discount to tenants, who have subsequently sold to buy-to-letters. Ironically, the council, she says, is now forced into renting back the same homes - at double or triple the cost - to house those on its waiting list." "'Dunno,' he said. 'A load of asylums, I reckon.'"
13 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. confused76 said...
Folks,
This is disgusting! BTLers are making a tax free fortune and also subsidized with government and council money. Yet another proof it is to make BTL rules much much tougher.
Look at more anti BTL comments at
http://money.guardian.co.uk/property/buyingtolet/story/0,,2098622,00.html
2. uncle chris said...
To be fair I think it's only BTL's that got in 5 or more years ago are the ones who have made silly profits. Most of the recent BTL's have probably had a nasty shock after expecting to make easy money - hence the large amount of "investment" properties coming on the market. From personal experience, our landlord is very good, our rent had been kept lower than average for the area over the past 3 years and things are fixed within days of being pointed out. My concern lies with landlords who have originated from "overseas", who it would appear have absolutely no concern for this country, the people and communities that live here .... only for the mighty dollar.
I'm not one for excessive government legislation, but the BTL system (and holiday homes) is one that needs urgent attention to curb the sheer greed that has taken hold, and as the article states, destroying our communities.
3. Pr said...
Ho hum, I know that a lot of people here are against planning, but there may be a case for setting up zones in some rural areas where planning permission is required for change of use from dwellinghouse to second home/holiday let where the council carries out a study to prove a saturation of second homes/holiday lets. It would require a change in the law because at the moment, there is no distinction between these uses in planning terms.
4. uncle tom said...
Across the road from me now is a decent three bedromm house - it's been empty for the past five years as an 'investment'
Whatever happened to the 'Empty dwelling management orders' that the government promised us several years ago?
Double council tax on all empty property would be a good move...
5. Orwell said...
Two observations:
1. I am very surprised that this current govt. have not tried to bring this speculation to an end gently, well before (say beginning in 2005 during the commencement of TB's third term). As they have not done so they risk a heavy burst and the loss of power as a consequence.
2. UT, why are people not squatting there? It is not yet a criminal offence to do so.
6. Wannabeemigre said...
I seem to have noticed a rising antagonism towards the BTL brigade in the mainstream press lately-whereas before they were wonderful people providing a "service" they seem increasingly to be seen as a nuisance-its strange that this has occurred now when it is no longer profitable to enter the BTL market-any ideas why this should be??
7. magnifico said...
well said Uncle Tom!
Not only unoccupied dwellings but also on third and upward home ownership. I thik it scandalous that there are private citizens with tens or even hundreds of properties in their portfolio.
8. Scott said...
The points made here are valid but do remember, first and foremost is to get ahead in spite of the problems, not dwell and become experts on them.
"The strong shall survive and the weak shall perish" - Charles Darwin
9. enuii said...
What does everyone one expect in a country that cannot compete with the rest of the world on wage costs, the end result is people trying to make a quick buck at the expense of their fellow citizens.
10. Rover2000 said...
Anyone see the £10M house in London taken over by Romanian squatters?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6736391.stm
Owner left it empty because he wanted to demolish it and build two and is dispute with the Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust. Utter total greed!
11. confused76 said...
I think there will be some action by the government, some visible action to try to redistribute wealth... perhaps just symbolic but who knows
Brown to stamp on private equity’s ‘unfair’ 10% tax
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/article1908882.ece
12. sirgoogle said...
Rover2K
Yes I saw the article on the TV - very heartening, the idiocy of the owner came through - it is a lovely house - and building 2x smaller would actually not be in keeping with the area. Let us hope that nobody in the Council is bribed.
Well done the Romanian gardener. That is one immigrant who is not contributing to the coffers of the BTL brigade.
13. magnifico said...
Scott try and tell that to those fatcats in the french and russian revolutions. Not that I have an admiration for murderous anarchy, but the tables can be quickly turned.