Tuesday, Sep 12, 2006
The inconvenient economics of amateur BTL
No Monkey Business: Buy-to-let: bets with the housekeeping
The buy-to-let fashion has not increased the 10% of the UK housing stock accounted for by the privately-rented sector – only facilitated a shift in ownership to a lot of amateurs. They are running a business inside their household finances.
It’s now a bad business to be in, with prospects of negative cash flows (including financing costs) and virtually no long-term real growth to compensate. They are also likely to be the wrong people to be running it. Negative cash flows will severely hurt many middle-income households and threaten important savings goals. There is widespread ignorance of the true cash-flow variance, the magnitude of realistic expected returns and proper bases of comparison with other assets. This leads to sub-optimal long as well as short-run decisions.
2 Comments
- If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
- If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
1. the bald man said...
All those considering BTL should read.
2. Sam. said...
Interesting, it also means that the professional BTL’ers are getting out. Kind of suggests they know something the others don’t.