QUOTE (JohnnyB @ Jul 17 2008, 04:11 PM)

But I do know something about them. I know they invested in stocks and shares and didn't expect them to go down.
How did they invest – directly, or via a fund? If the former, what made them invest? If the latter, what were they told when they invested? You really know absolutely
nothing about them. At very best, you are laughing at them because they do not have your education in how markets work. Well, congratulations, but I simply don’t share your sense of humour.
QUOTE (wickywackywoo @ Jul 17 2008, 04:40 PM)

I was alluding more to the way that the argument had been twisted into something totally different - ie. People losing money on the stockmarket somehow being compared to laughing at people in car accidents.
I have no sympathy whatsoever for people losing money on the stockmarket, just as I have never expected sympathy myself when I have lost money. If people believe markets are a one way bet and can only go up, then they are stupid. Rioting about it appears to prove the point. I find it amusing that people can be so stupid. So do some others. So what? This doesn't make us nazis.
As somebody else pointed out, this board has been laughing their collective t1ts off at BTLers being destroyed in a big way. I see little difference. Anybody stupid enough to buy a two bed brand new flat in August 2007 for £300k is so stupid that they cannot complain when they are laughed at by more sane people. In the same way, neither can people who think shares only go up.
Much of the thread appeared to me to be defending rioting/destruction of property. Now, I'm all in favour of a bit of argy bargy but only when it's justified. The markets moving against you does not justify violence in any way.
There is a difference between not being sympathetic to someone’s misfortune and taking enjoyment from it.
As for the word “Nazi”, it is not mine and I don’t think it’s appropriate. What springs to my mind is period movies where some in the crowd are laughing at people being executed. I thought they were caricatures, but it is exactly the same enjoyment that you guys are experiencing.
QUOTE (xux42 @ Jul 17 2008, 04:46 PM)

Have you noticed that's its generally clumsy people that ask this.
Stupid people are funny. Just spend 5 mins on Youtube if you want proof.
These twits happen to be Pakistan but it would be just as funny if they were, say failed Leeds flat / Florida condo flippers.
There's nothing wrong with laughing at people who are the architects of their own downfall.
Equally, its totally wrong to laugh at innocent victims. But they aren't, are they?
So if someone suffers from someone else’s mistake they deserve sympathy and if they suffer from their own mistake they should be the subject of ridicule and a source of enjoyment for sophisticated and people like you (who never make mistakes)?
QUOTE (wickywackywoo @ Jul 17 2008, 04:51 PM)

Ah! So you admit that although not normally amusing, it can be amusing at times. This seems a reasonable compromise to me and would depend on who it happened to:
I thought someone might pick up on that one. In what’s known as a “knock for knock” market, such as many of the eurobond markets prior to the 1992 currency crisis, market-makers are obliged to quote to other market makers when called upon (after making the price, the trader then has the right to ask one back in something else). If as a market-maker you lose money because the guy trading with you has better information (like a big client order) than you, then if you do the same thing back to him the next day, it can be amusing (and he might even laugh with you).
QUOTE (LondonToManchester @ Jul 17 2008, 05:31 PM)

I think this has alot to do with what the investers were told by the people selling the investments.
Were they told that there investments could never go down? In the UK that couldn't happen the FSA prevents companies from saying silly things like that. Can the pakistani version of the FSA do the same thing?
Thank you.
Those people who are having such fun watching other people suffer have not bothered to consider this yet, or even consider why it is that these people got so angry that they started throwing stones at buildings and other people (who they are also laughing at). They are simply assuming that they are stupid and/or backward – which, even if true, would not be a reason to laugh at them either. They are simply taking enjoyment from the fact that others are less well off than themselves, in terms of knowledge, education or even financially. I for one find it very distasteful.