urban_hymn
Nov 5 2005, 09:00 PM
When I check the share price of say Kenmare Resources (KMR) on Yahoo it tells me:
Bid 35.00 x 60000
Ask 35.50 x 36000
Has anyone got a minute to explain what those second figures mean?
Thank you
hymn
Yonmon
Nov 7 2005, 10:27 PM
Am unfamiliar with Yahoo's share service, but I would guess that they are the maximum dealing size at the time, i.e. you could sell 60000 at 35p, but only buy 36000 at 35.5p. Sometimes different maximum dealing sizes give a clue as to where the share price might head- if you can sell more than you can buy it might suggest that the market makers are short of stock and the next price move might be upwards. This is especially likely if in addition the spread has become narrower than usual, as seemed to be the case with the figures you give for KMR (I stand to be corrected, but from memory I think they more usually trade on about 1p spread). Lo and behold it's up a bit today from the figures you had on 4/11.
Doesn't always work as a predictor though; if only it did...
urban_hymn
Nov 8 2005, 08:21 AM
Thanks for that detailed reply Yonmon. There's more to it than I realised. It never occurred to me to monitor the change of spread on stocks for clues about future price movements. Cheers
hymn
Yonmon
Nov 8 2005, 05:27 PM
Just to complicate matters, some market makers allegedly create false signals sometimes, to sucker people into selling low or buying high.
Another consideration is that for small cap stocks, it's often possible to trade substantially "inside the strip", i.e. to buy at a lower price than the LSE-quoted offer price, and sell at a higher price than the official bid. So, if you don't have Level 2, it's often worth putting in dummy orders.
DrBubb
Nov 10 2005, 10:44 PM
GET away from trading small UK shares. They are a rip-off!
In Canadian or the US (or any modern market), you can lodge a bid (or offer) between the posted bids and offer, and there is a reasonable chance you will get filled. that is how an auction market "should" work.
In the UK, for the smaller stocks, your bid or offer is only seen by teh market markers, who have a monopoly on posting their bids. This KILLS liquidity, and is a practice that shilud be roundly condemned, or made illegal IMHO.
Fight feather-bedding, avoid the stocks and markets that work in this unfair way, and tell everyone you know to go on strike against this unfair situation
You have my permission to copy this posting and put it anywhere. Get the bastards where it counts: in their pockets
Yonmon
Nov 12 2005, 03:16 PM
Each to their own. Most of my trading is UK small caps and I make a nice return from it. Sure the spreads/illiquidity are a pain, but they also often work to one's favour, as when the MMs are short of stock the price tends to spike more than in a "better" market like Canada/US.
DrBubb
Nov 12 2005, 03:48 PM
Fine, Yonmon.
How about an example of the bid/offer at purchase, and at sale.
It would be interesting to see how much of your profits you gave up to MM's
Yonmon
Nov 14 2005, 11:26 PM
QUOTE(DrBubb @ Nov 12 2005, 03:48 AM) [snapback]233174[/snapback]
Fine, Yonmon.
How about an example of the bid/offer at purchase, and at sale.
It would be interesting to see how much of your profits you gave up to MM's
The biggest "official spread" on a share I ever traded was WTH, which at the time was 70%. However, it was possible to both buy and sell inside the strip, so the "real spread" was about 45%. The price spiked as it was clear to me it would, and at the same time the spread closed., allowing me to exit with a 30% plus return on a holding of about 4 weeks.
I should add that I had watched the stock for almost a year before conditions became right for the trade.
It's an interesting philosophical question as to whether I gave up profits to the MMs, or not. But not one that troubles me unduly.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.