QUOTE(uforia98 @ Sep 15 2005, 09:53 PM)
interesting, i looked through my paperwork an the Initial charge is indeed 0.5%. So far so good. There is however an initial commission as well of 0.5% and then an 'Ongoing commision' of 0.5% per *quarter* going to smile, and that is 'paid out of the charges the Fund manager levies'...
I am confused.
Without the figures in front of me, this will be hard to deduce... The initial charge could be one and the same as the initial comission.
But, yes, the ongong comission 'reward' goes to the 'broker'. Smile (or HL) help achieve their income this way (note they say they do not offer advice, blah, blah, blah and rebate initial costs... they work by churning lots of apps).
My earier post did point out that HL rebated part of the annual charge/commision so IMHO works out better than Smile.
However, digging a bit deeper, Cavendish Online seem to offer a better deal with a fixed charge commission that works out even cheaper if you have enough to invest.
Remember, for investment into a UT or OEIC:
1) Never invest directly with a provider, unless they offer a good deal - i.e. a near full discount on comission. Fund supermarkests help to address this.
2) Always seek a discount of most (if not all) of the initial charge.
3) If you can't do either of the above, try going to a local IFA and explaining what you want to do. If you KNOW the funds you want to invest in, persuade them to rebate all comission (as they have not given you advice). They can earn their money from the ongoing commission from the annual charge and any other investments/policies you might put their way...
4)ALWAYS do your own research!!