Pictures Of The Protests more pics and video
#16
Posted 28 September 2008 - 03:33 PM
#17
Posted 28 September 2008 - 04:01 PM
Wilhelm Ropke 1931
In the summer of 1931 a Labour Government suddenly sagged at its knees and fell dead. High Finance had killed it as High Finance will kill the next Labour Government, and the next again............
Excerpt from The Financiers and the Nation, Thomas Johnston, 1934
#18
Posted 28 September 2008 - 04:03 PM
#19
Posted 28 September 2008 - 04:06 PM
#20
Posted 28 September 2008 - 04:53 PM
crash2006, on Sep 28 2008, 04:21 AM, said:
Guy's jussed p!ssed because he was about to start a new job as an investment banker with Lehmans.
BTW, he's protesting the bail out, but he was happy enough to take $90k off the fanancial institutions in the first place. Additionally he does have a bail out. He can go bankrupt and let the state wipe his debts off.
This post has been edited by bearbullfence: 28 September 2008 - 04:54 PM
#21
Posted 28 September 2008 - 05:08 PM
bearbullfence, on Sep 28 2008, 05:53 PM, said:
Not quite so easy as that - this page is from Sallie Mae, Fannie's little sister, and major US student loan company:
Sallie Says, Relax? Don't Believe It
- Andrew Jackson President of the US, 1829-1837 correctly noting that bankers are a bunch of *****.
"Yeah, yeah, but "Mr. Brown"? That's a little too close to Mr. Shit."
- Quentin Tarantino, 1992, Reservoir Dogs.
#22
Posted 28 September 2008 - 05:15 PM
The Dude, on Sep 28 2008, 04:18 PM, said:
Agree with you there, though I never thought most Americans were as stupid as OUR media makes them out to be anyway.
Excuse me, could you repeat that please?
Avatar � anorthosite & pete.hpc 2009
#23
#24
Posted 28 September 2008 - 05:23 PM
#25
Posted 28 September 2008 - 05:39 PM
#27
Posted 28 September 2008 - 06:36 PM
BarrelShifter, on Sep 28 2008, 04:33 PM, said:
US soldiers have mortgages and foreclosures too.
No bankers were harmed in the making of this bailout
country is at risk
if you
do not keep up repayments
on a gilt or other loan secured on it
#28
Posted 28 September 2008 - 06:50 PM
BarrelShifter, on Sep 28 2008, 04:33 PM, said:
Why is a U.S. Army brigade being assigned to the "Homeland"?
This disturbing article from Army Times announces that "beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the [1st Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry Division] will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North" -- "the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities." The article details:
They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack. . . .
The 1st BCT's soldiers also will learn how to use "the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded," 1st BCT commander Col. Roger Cloutier said, referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.
For more than 100 years -- since the end of the Civil War -- deployment of the U.S. military inside the U.S. has been prohibited under The Posse Comitatus Act (the only exceptions being that the National Guard and Coast Guard are exempted, and use of the military on an emergency ad hoc basis is permitted, such as what happened after Hurricane Katrina). Though there have been some erosions of this prohibition over the last several decades (most perniciously to allow the use of the military to work with law enforcement agencies in the "War on Drugs"), the bright line ban on using the U.S. military as a standing law enforcement force inside the U.S. has been more or less honored -- until now. And as the Army Times notes, once this particular brigade completes its one-year assignment, "expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one."
The decision this month to permanently deploy a U.S. Army brigade inside the U.S. for purely domestic law enforcement purposes is the fruit of the Congressional elimination of the long-standing prohibitions in Posse Comitatus (although there are credible signs that even before Congress acted, the Bush administration secretly decided it possessed the inherent power to violate the Act). It shouldn't take any efforts to explain why the permanent deployment of the U.S. military inside American cities, acting as the President's police force, is so disturbing. Bovard:
"Martial law" is a euphemism for military dictatorship. When foreign democracies are overthrown and a junta establishes martial law, Americans usually recognize that a fundamental change has occurred. . .
This post has been edited by Little Professor: 28 September 2008 - 06:51 PM
Sign In
Register
Help



Back to top
MultiQuote







