House Price Crash forum: Glasgow Riverside Woes - House Price Crash forum

Jump to content

powered by
  • (9 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Glasgow Riverside Woes Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   jardinec 

  • HPC Poster
  • PipPip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 08-March 07
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 02:34 PM

Nice article.

....absentee landlords who rent out their flats and don't bother paying factors bills...

...Of the 370 flats only around 100 owners pay up. And more than 70 flats are in the process of being repossessed....

and...

...Devastated Joyce Boyd bought her penthouse apartment almost three years ago for £289,000.She recently had it valued and was told that due to the problems is now worth just £175,000. :unsure:

http://www.eveningti...2034648.0.0.php

#2 User is offline   TheCountOfNowhere 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,765
  • Joined: 05-October 07
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 03:49 PM

"She recently had it valued and was told that due to the problems is now worth just £175,000."

£175K....I think they must mean £75K !!!!

Thats a "hand the keys back and walk away" flat if I every seen one !!!

#3 User is offline   Lone_Twin 

  • HPC Senior Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,134
  • Joined: 07-August 07
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 03:56 PM

Slums of the future as many have mentioned.
.
I need a moderately sized house in the country with as much land as I can
afford. I don't think they will come down in price quite so much though.
.
ST
<< Formerly Super Ted >>

The banks are licenced by the government to extract profit from their slice of the monopoly in the issue of the state mandated means of exchange. Bankers bonuses like MPs expenses are distractions from theft and violence at a systematic level. -- ST
-----
You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. -- Ayn Rand

#4 User is offline   getdoon_weebobby 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,041
  • Joined: 16-May 07
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 03:59 PM

View PostSuper Ted, on Feb 11 2008, 03:56 PM, said:

Slums of the future as many have mentioned.
.
I need a moderately sized house in the country with as much land as I can
afford. I don't think they will come down in price quite so much though.
.
ST


3 bed at auction recently didnt sell - think its available for £157k now
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

Margaret Thatcher

'The idea that you can solve a problem of too much debt and too much consumption with more debt and more consumption, can you believe that grown-ups would say something like that? It's mind-boggling to me that people who are supposedly educated really believe this, and they seem to'

Jim Rogers

#5 User is offline   The Masked Tulip 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 17,422
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:00 PM

View PostSuper Ted, on Feb 11 2008, 03:56 PM, said:

I need a moderately sized house in the country with as much land as I can
afford.
ST



Must be costing you a pretty fortune keeping all those bodies refrigerated! :blink:
The success or failure of your deeds does not add up to the sum of your life. Your spirit cannot be weighed. Judge yourself by the intention of your actions and by the strength you faced the challenges that have stood in your way.

The people closest to you have been trying to tell you that you have made a difference. That you did change things for the better. The Universe is vast and we are so small. There is really only one thing that we can ever truly control - whether we are good or evil.


The political triumph of the American Right has been to advance relentlessly the economic interests of the country's richest people, while emphasising a swath of moral, social and foreign policy issues that motivate and certainly distract middle-class and poor voters.

#6 User is offline   SMAC67 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,472
  • Joined: 20-June 07
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:00 PM

This is precisely why I say, DO NOT buy a flat, don't do it, unless you like stress.....been there, seen it, done it, bought the T-shirt, repeat after me, BTL landlords are scum......
"The wisest men follow their own direction, and listen to no prophet guiding them. None but the fools believe in oracles, for-saking their own judgement." - Euripides 400BC

#7 User is offline   nohpc 

  • HPC Senior Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,017
  • Joined: 05-October 06
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:03 PM

View Postweebobby, on Feb 11 2008, 03:59 PM, said:

3 bed at auction recently didnt sell - think its available for £157k now


I know this waterside development and it is very close to a motorway but the location is good for glasgow city centre. There is massive oversupply of new build flats at the clydeside in glasgow and maximum achievable rent seems to be 650 pounds per month. The pent houses in this particular development would be good value for 175 thousand but there is no way they will sell if the problems are as bad as mentioned in this article. I wouldn't be surprised if all the glasgow waterside developments are having similar problems.

#8 User is offline   scott666 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 861
  • Joined: 16-January 07
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:05 PM

There is one of these flats for sale on Right Move (not a penthouse tho') for £85k,

Click

#9 User is offline   Scarecrow 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 605
  • Joined: 11-May 05
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:08 PM

Quote

A well-placed property source has told the Evening Times one investor bought 40 flats at Kingston Quay, pocketing up to £200,000 - £5000 cashback from every property - from builders Barratt.

It's claimed the investor has since failed to pay a penny to factors or mortgage lenders


Anecdotally, I've heard similar stories about the other waterfront developments in Glasgow - I do feel a bit sorry for those who thought they were buying 'plush new flats' and have ended up surrounded by junkies and in serious negative equity. Noticed more than a few of them in the auction section of the papers.

#10 User is offline   Scarecrow 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 605
  • Joined: 11-May 05
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:11 PM

View Postscott666, on Feb 11 2008, 04:05 PM, said:

There is one of these flats for sale on Right Move (not a penthouse tho') for £85k,

Click


Good find - it looks half wrecked!

#11 User is offline   Wait & See 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,198
  • Joined: 26-March 07
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:12 PM

I remember when these flats were built, they were being sold as luxury appartments for the young city workers, but have just turned into another (expensive) Glasgow highrise, full of junkies & buckfast drinkers. :rolleyes:

Oh well - somewhere to house the all bankrupt homeless in a few years time I guess.


Also read that these flats are only expected to last for 25-30 years - they're cheap sh*te.

This post has been edited by Wait & See: 11 February 2008 - 04:14 PM


#12 User is offline   tbatst2000 

  • HPC Senior Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,457
  • Joined: 23-September 05
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:15 PM

View PostScarecrow, on Feb 11 2008, 04:08 PM, said:

I do feel a bit sorry for those who thought they were buying 'plush new flats' and have ended up surrounded by junkies and in serious negative equity.

Indeed, especially at those prices. A bit like being housed on a council sink estate and then being asked to pay 100K to be allowed to leave. Awful, I feel really sorry for the owner-occupiers there.

#13 User is offline   stillill 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 515
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Bull or Bear?Neither

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:15 PM

So much in this article shows what's gone so very badly wrong with property in the last 10 years, on all sides.

Are buyers in this development just thick? They got caught out by not doing their research. Tradeston is a pit, stuck between the motor way and the river. It's pretty filthy, scarred by flyovers, crowded when there are events at the SECC and close enough to Anderston to get the junkie/prostitute element on their doorstep.

Anyone with half-a-brain knew these developments were being hoovered up by BTL. Barratt are in it for the money, they're not a cuddly developer of high-quality homes. They shit all over this country - what do they care who buys the thing as long as it's off their balance sheet? I pity the buyers stuck in a slum due to fraudulent landlords, but buyer beware.

Solicitor friends of mine told stories of mortgages being withheld on these developments due to the very poor build quality of some of these places - this was 3 or 4 years ago when they'd give your goldfish a mortgage if he could scribble on the self-cert form.

I think the Council and the MP are right to say "you're a private individual, making a private investment, and you've come unstuck. Life's like that."

#14 User is offline   Scarecrow 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 605
  • Joined: 11-May 05
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:16 PM

And without getting too right wing about it, they tend to be full of tenants whose rent is paid for by the tax payer, so we're subsidising these absent landlords, and paying the rent of the junkies at the same time :(

#15 User is offline   Not Long Now 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,331
  • Joined: 29-January 08
  • Bull or Bear?Bear

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:23 PM

View PostScarecrow, on Feb 11 2008, 04:08 PM, said:

Anecdotally, I've heard similar stories about the other waterfront developments in Glasgow - I do feel a bit sorry for those who thought they were buying 'plush new flats' and have ended up surrounded by junkies and in serious negative equity. Noticed more than a few of them in the auction section of the papers.


Similar situation in Birmingham with these things.

Look on RM and see how many flats are for sale in this development:- http://www.rightmove...8...=1&tr_t=buy

There are loads of them, and the block looks like a cross between a Russian Tower block and a holiday appartment block in Spain.

I think 2/3 were sold at the Auction last week in London (Cafe Royal). One went for £134, 000 - no idea how much it went for originally.

As far as an investment is concerned - you're better off putting your money on a horse, than hoping to make money out of one of these things.

The'll be torn down in 20 years.

  • (9 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users