penbat1 Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 They usually give better returns than deposit accounts (up to 10% pr annum) and i have never heard of them going negative so why bother with deposit accounts ? Quote
Killer Bunny Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 They usually give better returns than deposit accounts (up to 10% pr annum) and i have never heard of them going negative so why bother with deposit accounts ? Is this a joke? If not, and you are a regular on this site, don't you realise that companies are at risk and so will be their debt. Corp bonds are a pile of sh1t. Quote
Numani Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 A certain points in the economic cycle corporate bonds offer a great reward/risk trade off. Right now you are unlikely to get much more than the coupon back with the possibility of capital losses. why? we are without a doubt nearing the end of a great run of performance. Even the average fund delivered some meaningful cash + returns over the last few years. Now corporate debt deafults have bottomed out and expected to rise. Spreads are historically tight compared to Gilts/Bonds. Most of the previous strong performance came from spread compression. Quote
penbat1 Posted November 11, 2005 Author Posted November 11, 2005 A certain points in the economic cycle corporate bonds offer a great reward/risk trade off. Right now you are unlikely to get much more than the coupon back with the possibility of capital losses. why? we are without a doubt nearing the end of a great run of performance. Even the average fund delivered some meaningful cash + returns over the last few years. Now corporate debt deafults have bottomed out and expected to rise. Spreads are historically tight compared to Gilts/Bonds. Most of the previous strong performance came from spread compression. Whats your view of them as a long term investment, say 10 years, which includes at least one complete economic cycle ? Quote
Killer Bunny Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 A certain points in the economic cycle corporate bonds offer a great reward/risk trade off. Right now you are unlikely to get much more than the coupon back with the possibility of capital losses. why? we are without a doubt nearing the end of a great run of performance. Even the average fund delivered some meaningful cash + returns over the last few years. Now corporate debt deafults have bottomed out and expected to rise. Spreads are historically tight compared to Gilts/Bonds. Most of the previous strong performance came from spread compression. As I said sh1t But you did it beautifully. I did it somewhat less technically. Quote
Numani Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 Whats your view of them as a long term investment, say 10 years, which includes at least one complete economic cycle ? One can not take a ten year view on this asset class. All that matters is now and what you could reasonably see potentially happening ahead. you could buy now. inflation rears its ugly head. Interest rates/ gilt yields go up. Corporate bond yields irrespective of credit ratings go higher - immediate capital losses - maybe two years incomes worth. Quote
Too expensive to trade up Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 (edited) Whats your view of them as a long term investment, say 10 years, which includes at least one complete economic cycle ? That's like saying I'm buying a house now because in 10 years time It'll be worth more. On a releated front the Halifax were selling these as a 'safe' investment about two years ago. They were advertised as a deposit account but with more interest. I was not happy when I saw this. In the past I've invested in high-yielding shares in boring companies such as utilites instead of bonds. Edited November 11, 2005 by Too expensive to trade up Quote
penbat1 Posted November 11, 2005 Author Posted November 11, 2005 That's like saying I'm buying a house now because in 10 years time It'll be worth more. On a releated front the Halifax were selling these as a 'safe' investment about two years ago. They were advertised as a deposit account but with more interest. I was not happy when I saw this. In the past I've invested in high-yielding shares in boring companies such as utilites instead of bonds. Yup The Halifax are flogging them like crazy: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/investing-and...37&in_page_id=3 Quote
nobody Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 They usually give better returns than deposit accounts (up to 10% pr annum) and i have never heard of them going negative so why bother with deposit accounts ? Bonds which give you 10% pa are Junk Bonds and your capital is at a high risk. I've had a mini ISA of a respectable corporate bond for about 4 years and even in the ISA wrapper (where they can still reclaim tax credits on dividends) it has yielded about 6% pa less the inflationary erosion of my capital. i.e. I've had the income but the bonds could be sold for not much more than I bought them. Quote
penbat1 Posted November 11, 2005 Author Posted November 11, 2005 Bonds which give you 10% pa are Junk Bonds and your capital is at a high risk. I've had a mini ISA of a respectable corporate bond for about 4 years and even in the ISA wrapper (where they can still reclaim tax credits on dividends) it has yielded about 6% pa less the inflationary erosion of my capital. i.e. I've had the income but the bonds could be sold for not much more than I bought them. I take your point about junk bonds but the inflation issue also applies to deposit accounts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.