Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Poverty Barons Who Make A Fortune From Aid Budget


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 punter

punter

    HPC Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,375 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:30 PM

Today's episode of unacceptable looting by the public sector is brought to you by the Department for International Development, a haven for dodgy accounting, corruption and outright theft. Note that since the un-Conservative and idiotic lunatic that we have as a Prime Minister has decided to increase the aid budget 50% from £8bn/year to £12bn/year by 2015 and defends it saying Brits must be charitable while many more pensioners are plunging into fuel poverty and while allegedly cutting everything else apart from the other sacred cow that is the health budget the situation is about to get worse.

-

'Poverty barons' who make a fortune from taxpayer-funded aid budget

Britain's swelling overseas aid budget has created a new group of “poverty barons” paying themselves up to £2 million a year for their work helping the disadvantaged.

By Andrew Gilligan

10:00PM BST 15 Sep 2012

The Department for International Development (DFID) paid almost £500million last year to consultants, mostly British, many of whom earn six, even seven-figure incomes, courtesy of the taxpayer.

DFID also funds dozens of foreign consultancy firms. It is paying £6million to the University of Cape Town to investigate mental health issues in southern Africa and millions of pounds to US-based organisations, including the Clinton Foundation, the International Food Policy Research Institute and Family Health Inter-national.

It is paying a Washington-based group, Search for Common Ground, £3.9million to “support the electoral cycle in Sierra Leone”. Consultancy firms in India and Uganda are also receiving large sums.

DFID spent more than £20million last year on hotels, including many five-star ones. Next month it will open a 40,000 sq ft Indian branch office in Delhi with 18 meeting rooms and 280 desks — even though the then International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, said last year DFID would not be in India for “very much longer”. The furniture bill for the outpost comes to almost £400,000.

A Sunday Telegraph investigation shows just how lucrative the aid business can be for the private companies that dominate DFID’s roster.
Related Articles

The managing director of the London-based development consultancy Adam Smith International (ASI), which gets most of its income from DFID, paid himself a salary and dividends totalling almost £1.3million in 2010.

William Morrison earned £200,000 from ASI and collected dividends worth £1.06million from its parent company, Amphion Group, wholly owned by him and three of his fellow directors.

Amphion Group’s accounts state that its purpose is to act as a holding company for ASI.

Mr Morrison’s salary rose by a quarter last year, to £253,000. He and the three fellow directors shared dividends of £7.5million, or almost £1.9million each, which they paid to Amphion Group.

The directors collected salaries averaging £125,000 each.

Adam Smith International — which grew out of, but is now not related to, the Right-wing think-tank, the Adam Smith Institute — was paid £37million by DFID last year to promote the free market in the Third World. Its total turnover that year was £53.6million, with profits of £5million, up 10 per cent on 2010.

Its work for DFID includes tax reform in Afghanistan, school capacity building in Pakistan and a market development programme in Nepal.

A director of ASI and Amphion, Peter Young, justified the payments, saying: “We have got tax revenues in Afghanistan up from next to nothing to £2billion. If you want to get a good job done, you have to get people who know what they’re doing. Our profit margins are on the low side for consultancies.”

Mr Young, who paid himself a dividend of £800,000 in 2010, said ASI employed “low hundreds” of staff on DFID contracts. Most earned between £300 and £850 a day.

He said: “If you hire a plumber in London, you’re going to be paying £1,000 a day, if not more.”

Not all the money paid by DFID stayed with ASI, Mr Young said. Much of it was passed to other suppliers.

Another development consultancy firm, Maxwell Stamp, was paid £16.4million by DFID last year for projects including community legal services in Bangladesh and opposing child marriage in Ethiopia. Its highest-paid director earned at least £326,000, double his salary the year before.

Dozens of other staff of development consultancies substantially funded by DFID pay themselves six-figure salaries. At Hertfordshire-based HTSPE, which got about a third of its turnover from DFID last year, the highest-paid director is on £144,000. The company earned £12.1million from DFID in 2010/11, and is currently involved in the department’s numerous programmes. It is also paid by DFID to run policy development for the governments of Malawi and Nigeria.

Options Consultancy Services, a subsidiary of the abortion rights charity Marie Stopes, runs projects for DFID in India, Africa and Nepal. Its turnover last year was £12.6million — about half of it from the British aid budget. Its highest-paid director earned £233,000.

Sussex-based Health Partners International collected £7million from DFID in 2010/11, more than half its turnover. Consultancy salaries are up to £133,500 a year.

At Oxford Policy Management, which runs DFID’s “oil sector transparency” initiative and several other programmes, the highest-paid director earned £125,000 last year, up 25 per cent in a year.

However, the company’s annual report warns that the Government has “initiated efficiency measures that may have an impact on the profitability of the work available”.

Several of the best-paid consultants are former DFID officials who appear to have gained substantial increases in their personal wealth since leaving the department, even though they are still doing essentially the same work.

While almost all other departments are cutting spending, ministers have committed to increases in DFID’s budget, which will rise by 35 per cent in real terms in the next three years, or more than £3billion a year.

Because it is cutting staff it is turning to consultants to deliver programmes, prompting concerns about value for money from MPs on the international development select committee.

“We question why the department was paying consultants large amounts of public money in fees for development work,” the MPs said earlier this year.

Jo Johnson, a Conservative MP on the public accounts committee, said DFID was having to “shovel money out of the door” to meet its spending target.

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “This is further evidence that the department is failing to ensure that taxpayers’ cash is being spent wisely. Ministers have insisted that they need more money to help the world’s poorest, but taxpayers will be appalled that hundreds of millions of pounds is being channelled to pricey consultancy firms.

“Spending these vast sums on consultants looks like a bad deal for the taxpayer.”

A DFID spokesman said: “Taxpayers rightly expect DFID to monitor development and humanitarian programmes. That can involve using expert organisations to help ensure delivery and close oversight of the effectiveness of aid projects on the ground, which can often take place in remote or rural areas.

“Those organisations have won contracts to work for DFID through a best value, competitive bid process.”

http://www.telegraph...aid-budget.html

#2 punter

punter

    HPC Veteran

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,375 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:37 PM

Also note that they have a nerve to compare themselves to actually productive people in the private sector like plumbers.

The hubris and greed is ridiculous. These people feel entitled to our taxpayer money - millions of it - and think they're providing useful consultancy services.

What do we pay our UN membership fee for? why do we need all these consultants and hangers-on to administer programs in developing countries?

If we're serious about cutting government waste - which Cameron isn't - then this is a place to start.

Yet the lunatic's want to increase its budget 50%!

How can they defend such stupidity? Sadly, the electorate is too dumb to get angry and most of the press don't give a damn.

#3 lie to bet

lie to bet

    HPC Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 127 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:58 PM

If Mr young of asi seriously pays plumbers in London £1000/day I can give him some free consultancy and save him 84%. I would recommend the dfid save 100% of the money they give him.

#4 Executive Sadman

Executive Sadman

    I live on HPC!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,619 posts

Posted 28 December 2012 - 02:04 AM

Yes. this was on Russia today yesterday too. with max keiser
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Posted Image

#5 durhamborn

durhamborn

    HPC Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,419 posts
  • Location:Durham

Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:20 AM

Still they can get it back from the bloke who worked for 30 years and lost his job,factory closes due to tax rates to pay for the aid budget.

He has his curtains drawn so should lose his £72 a week.

This is one of the nails that will sink the Tories.

Starve the government of as much tax as you can,its the onlly answer to this hell.

#6 sombreroloco

sombreroloco

    HPC Regular

  • New Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 676 posts

Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:28 PM

I though the unacceptable looting by the public sector was brought to me by the EU or the Romanian gyppos. Maybe next year.

#7 Lewis Gordon Pugh

Lewis Gordon Pugh

    HPC Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,114 posts

Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:59 PM

Blue, red, blue, blue blue, red, blue, red, red, red, blue, yellow, red, blue.

NOTHING CHANGES.

#8 satch

satch

    HPC Guru

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,621 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 28 December 2012 - 01:28 PM

Today's episode of unacceptable looting by the public sector is brought to you by the Department for International Development, a haven for dodgy accounting, corruption and outright theft. Note that since the un-Conservative and idiotic lunatic that we have as a Prime Minister has decided to increase the aid budget 50% from £8bn/year to £12bn/year by 2015 and defends it saying Brits must be charitable while many more pensioners are plunging into fuel poverty and while allegedly cutting everything else apart from the other sacred cow that is the health budget the situation is about to get worse.

-

'Poverty barons' who make a fortune from taxpayer-funded aid budget

Britain's swelling overseas aid budget has created a new group of “poverty barons” paying themselves up to £2 million a year for their work helping the disadvantaged.

By Andrew Gilligan

10:00PM BST 15 Sep 2012

The Department for International Development (DFID) paid almost £500million last year to consultants, mostly British, many of whom earn six, even seven-figure incomes, courtesy of the taxpayer.

DFID also funds dozens of foreign consultancy firms. It is paying £6million to the University of Cape Town to investigate mental health issues in southern Africa and millions of pounds to US-based organisations, including the Clinton Foundation, the International Food Policy Research Institute and Family Health Inter-national.

It is paying a Washington-based group, Search for Common Ground, £3.9million to “support the electoral cycle in Sierra Leone”. Consultancy firms in India and Uganda are also receiving large sums.

DFID spent more than £20million last year on hotels, including many five-star ones. Next month it will open a 40,000 sq ft Indian branch office in Delhi with 18 meeting rooms and 280 desks — even though the then International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, said last year DFID would not be in India for “very much longer”. The furniture bill for the outpost comes to almost £400,000.

A Sunday Telegraph investigation shows just how lucrative the aid business can be for the private companies that dominate DFID’s roster.
Related Articles

The managing director of the London-based development consultancy Adam Smith International (ASI), which gets most of its income from DFID, paid himself a salary and dividends totalling almost £1.3million in 2010.

William Morrison earned £200,000 from ASI and collected dividends worth £1.06million from its parent company, Amphion Group, wholly owned by him and three of his fellow directors.

Amphion Group’s accounts state that its purpose is to act as a holding company for ASI.

Mr Morrison’s salary rose by a quarter last year, to £253,000. He and the three fellow directors shared dividends of £7.5million, or almost £1.9million each, which they paid to Amphion Group.

The directors collected salaries averaging £125,000 each.

Adam Smith International — which grew out of, but is now not related to, the Right-wing think-tank, the Adam Smith Institute — was paid £37million by DFID last year to promote the free market in the Third World. Its total turnover that year was £53.6million, with profits of £5million, up 10 per cent on 2010.

Its work for DFID includes tax reform in Afghanistan, school capacity building in Pakistan and a market development programme in Nepal.

A director of ASI and Amphion, Peter Young, justified the payments, saying: “We have got tax revenues in Afghanistan up from next to nothing to £2billion. If you want to get a good job done, you have to get people who know what they’re doing. Our profit margins are on the low side for consultancies.”

Mr Young, who paid himself a dividend of £800,000 in 2010, said ASI employed “low hundreds” of staff on DFID contracts. Most earned between £300 and £850 a day.

He said: “If you hire a plumber in London, you’re going to be paying £1,000 a day, if not more.”

Not all the money paid by DFID stayed with ASI, Mr Young said. Much of it was passed to other suppliers.

Another development consultancy firm, Maxwell Stamp, was paid £16.4million by DFID last year for projects including community legal services in Bangladesh and opposing child marriage in Ethiopia. Its highest-paid director earned at least £326,000, double his salary the year before.

Dozens of other staff of development consultancies substantially funded by DFID pay themselves six-figure salaries. At Hertfordshire-based HTSPE, which got about a third of its turnover from DFID last year, the highest-paid director is on £144,000. The company earned £12.1million from DFID in 2010/11, and is currently involved in the department’s numerous programmes. It is also paid by DFID to run policy development for the governments of Malawi and Nigeria.

Options Consultancy Services, a subsidiary of the abortion rights charity Marie Stopes, runs projects for DFID in India, Africa and Nepal. Its turnover last year was £12.6million — about half of it from the British aid budget. Its highest-paid director earned £233,000.

Sussex-based Health Partners International collected £7million from DFID in 2010/11, more than half its turnover. Consultancy salaries are up to £133,500 a year.

At Oxford Policy Management, which runs DFID’s “oil sector transparency” initiative and several other programmes, the highest-paid director earned £125,000 last year, up 25 per cent in a year.

However, the company’s annual report warns that the Government has “initiated efficiency measures that may have an impact on the profitability of the work available”.

Several of the best-paid consultants are former DFID officials who appear to have gained substantial increases in their personal wealth since leaving the department, even though they are still doing essentially the same work.

While almost all other departments are cutting spending, ministers have committed to increases in DFID’s budget, which will rise by 35 per cent in real terms in the next three years, or more than £3billion a year.

Because it is cutting staff it is turning to consultants to deliver programmes, prompting concerns about value for money from MPs on the international development select committee.

“We question why the department was paying consultants large amounts of public money in fees for development work,” the MPs said earlier this year.

Jo Johnson, a Conservative MP on the public accounts committee, said DFID was having to “shovel money out of the door” to meet its spending target.

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “This is further evidence that the department is failing to ensure that taxpayers’ cash is being spent wisely. Ministers have insisted that they need more money to help the world’s poorest, but taxpayers will be appalled that hundreds of millions of pounds is being channelled to pricey consultancy firms.

“Spending these vast sums on consultants looks like a bad deal for the taxpayer.”

A DFID spokesman said: “Taxpayers rightly expect DFID to monitor development and humanitarian programmes. That can involve using expert organisations to help ensure delivery and close oversight of the effectiveness of aid projects on the ground, which can often take place in remote or rural areas.

“Those organisations have won contracts to work for DFID through a best value, competitive bid process.”

http://www.telegraph...aid-budget.html

Look we need to get back to demonising those benefit scroungers especially those in the Northern wastelands and those that gave up their jobs at Twinings and Dyson and those new scroungers from Comet.
George Osborne July 2013; 'I don't think in the current environment a house price bubble is going to emerge in 18 months or three years.' Mark Carney September 2013; ' ... there has been an improvement in prices and activity (talking about the housing market) Osborne to cabinet as quoted in the Indie October 2013; "Hopefully we will get a little housing boom & everyone will be happy"

Osborne says; “Printing money is the last resort of desperate governments when all other policies have failed.”

George Osborne December 2008; “Savers and pensioners are the forgotten victims … They are innocent bystanders and it’s simply not good enough for the Government to walk on by."

In his 1997 Budget speech, Gordon Brown said, "I will not allow house prices to get out of control and put at risk the sustainability of the future". He went on to say that he did not want a return to "instability, speculation and negative equity" of the 1980's and 1990's.

#9 MrPin

MrPin

    Mild Irritant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,721 posts
  • Location:Turnip Land
  • About Me:Fount of wisdom, and pinnacle of taste!

Posted 28 December 2012 - 01:36 PM

I am fundamentally opposed to the "charity business"! Virtually nothing goes to the people you might give for! :huh:

Although I quite like the "Salvation Army" despite not being a religious person myself! :blink:
Ignorance can be cured! Stupidity cannot!

#10 erranta

erranta

    Knows he doesn't know

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • Location:Norwich
  • About Me:Too old for another mortgage

    - fighting slavery and serfdom by despotic 'false' leaders of mock-democracy, their mega-corps and corporatism for the next ignorant generation

Posted 28 December 2012 - 02:14 PM

Yes. this was on Russia today yesterday too. with max keiser


He's an illuminati stooge

"Search for Common Ground"
"Common Sense" A masonic pamphlet/treatise written in 19C

Both are piss-takes by the Norman overlords (and their Sergeants at arms) relating to the land/wealth grabs in previous centuries "Commons"

"The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit." Proverbs Ch18 v.11

Whistle Blow!
You know 'IT' makes sense!

Exploitation & corrupt Government / Elite Rule? They have nowhere to hide if we all EXPOSE their corruption!


"Most propaganda is NOT designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give MORAL COWARDS an excuse not to think at all!"


#11 Goat

Goat

    HPC livestock

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,065 posts

Posted 28 December 2012 - 02:30 PM

Blue, red, blue, blue blue, red, blue, red, red, red, blue, yellow, red, blue.

NOTHING CHANGES.


Really?

Was it really like this in 1997?

A lot of this is was constructed in the Bliar/Broon years when we all believed that money grew on trees.
Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware - anon 1523AD

Told you - Young Goat December 2007AD

We are all waking up to the reality that our houses aren't worth what we thought they were. - David Willetts MP 15 March 2011.

Join today: British Goat Society




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users