Highly Unlikely Ns&i Will Bring Back Index Linkers This Year
#1
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:14 PM
#2
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:15 PM
#3
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:15 PM
doccyboy, on 18 April 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:
BM savings are doing inflation or 4.3% which ever is the higher
BM savings
BOE rates wont go above 2½% in my life time
Rob and Bob lose their job
#4
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:14 PM
Hmmm... share dealing fund it is then.
#5
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:15 PM
Quote
Eh? Does this mean the Treasury don't need to borrow any more money from Joe public?
I wonder why not, is is that the money markets are open and clamouring to lend to us, or that they think inflation will spike and devalue current debt?
#6
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:28 PM
msi, on 18 April 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:
I wonder why not, is is that the money markets are open and clamouring to lend to us, or that they think inflation will spike and devalue current debt?
The bankrupt of England want high street banks to be funded from customer deposits rather than the BOE, that is why they they are doing this.
Ultimately the money not being put into NS&I 'should' flow into the high street banks for mortgage lending.
I say screw them, I would rather keep my money in NS&I at a lower interest rate than lend my money to high street banks who lend it out at a margin and push up house prices.
In the next 12 months London will fall by >10%
http://www.estateage...le-at-over-500k
Wonder how many illegal immigrants you'd have to squeeze in there to make this a savvy investment?
#7
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:33 PM
khards, on 18 April 2012 - 09:28 PM, said:
Ultimately the money not being put into NS&I 'should' flow into the high street banks for mortgage lending.
I say screw them, I would rather keep my money in NS&I at a lower interest rate than lend my money to high street banks who lend it out at a margin and push up house prices.
In that case, go for the highest paying high street rates (around 4.5% fixed for 5 years), so they have to up their SVR, but then move after 3 so they have to look for short term funding, pushing the SVR up.
I'm fed up with all this c**p
#8
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:41 AM
gf3, on 18 April 2012 - 08:15 PM, said:
Not bad if you don't mind locking your money away for 5 years min, but the 5% charge on early withdrawals will wipe out over one year's interest in the short term.
Q
Money for Nothing, Home Foreclosed
#9
Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:46 AM
I haven't checked the small print however.
Flynn
#10
Posted 19 April 2012 - 12:02 PM
InlikeFlynn, on 19 April 2012 - 11:46 AM, said:
I haven't checked the small print however.
Flynn
Doubt it, I've even had second roll-overs of three year bonds into index-linked when current conditions say you only get one.
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help


Back to top
MultiQuote




