House Price Crash forum: Pensions - Work Till Your Dead - House Price Crash forum

Jump to content

powered by
  • (7 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Pensions - Work Till Your Dead Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Dave Beans 

  • HPC Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,019
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 01:04 AM

I've still got another 40 years or so still to go...brilliant...whereas I'll be paying for those who retired at 50 or 55 for the next 30 + years....and they'll still have the audacity to say that the young are lazy sods....

http://www.dailymail...expectancy.html

Quote

Britons will in future be forced to wait until their 70s to collect their state pensions after the Government confirmed a link to life expectancy is imminent. The pension age is already set to rise to 66 by 2020 for both men and women, before hitting 67 by 2028. Now the Government will use an Office for Budget Responsibility report, due to be published this summer, to create a solid link between the state pension age and rising life expectancy.

It is likely see today's 33 year-olds wait until 73 before they get their state pension, experts said. Andrew Tully, of pensions firm MGM Advantage, said: ‘This should serve as a wake-up call for many people. If people want to stop work at an earlier age they need to review their retirement planning, and take control of their future.’

In his Budget speech, Chancellor George Osborne promised an 'automatic review that keeps up with increases in longevity'.

The Budget document expanded on this saying: ' Budget 2012 announces that the Government will commit to ensuring the State Pension age is increased in future to take into account increases in longevity and will publish proposals at the time of the Office for Budget Responsibility’s 2012 Fiscal sustainability report.'

Experts have long warned that more pension age rises are 'inevitable' as Britons spend longer in retirement. Tom McPhail, of financial adviser Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'In 1948 when current form of state pension was introduced with a retirement age of 65, life expectancy was 66.'

Today life expectancy at birth is around 78 for men and 82 for women, with the cost to the Treasury ballooning as the baby boomer generation of those born in the aftermath of the Second World War reaching retirement. According to the Office for National Statistics, life expectancy has increased by a total of 5.3 years over the three decades since 1981.

If that trend continued and was used by the Government as a basis for pension age increases, young Britons today will face 60-year working careers, according to calculations by pensions firm Standard Life. The latest estimates suggest that by 2056, the life expectancy for a man and woman living in England will be 84 and 89 years respectively.

It means today's sixth-formers could be forced to work until they're 77 under the new plans. Standard Life says that if the pension age rose from now in line with the change in life expectancy over the past three decades, a seventeen-year-old would not be able to retire until 2071, when an A-Level student born in 1995 would be 77.

"Wont someone please think of the children"

The Sad Faces Of Wronged Mail Readers

Eurocleese De Zouch

#2 User is offline   Chuffy Chuffnell 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 1,706
  • Joined: 08-November 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 01:19 AM

Err... what's wrong with raising the retirement age? It should be in the 70s already.

I know it's annoying seeing the current lot retire so early, but they will quite literally pass on at some point and we can resume normality whereby a person cannot expect to live the latter third of their life doing fvck all.

This post has been edited by Chuffy Chuffnell: 22 March 2012 - 01:20 AM


#3 User is offline   spyguy 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 774
  • Joined: 05-December 05

Posted 22 March 2012 - 06:56 AM

People forget how much life expectancy has gone up in so short a time - accutarial time.

In the mid-70s the family on my dads side were all dying. Mind you these were all miners.
Typical outcome was early retirement in mid 50s. 5 to 10 years retirement. Drop dead.

In almost 40 years, you seen 'profession's such as teachers and plods retire in the their later 40s/early 50s. Most these will be on a pension for longer than they have paid into it.

The retirement age should be 70 now. I should be moving towards 75 over the next 20 years.

#4 User is offline   Dorkins 

  • HPC Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,460
  • Joined: 09-June 09

Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:18 AM

Somehow I suspect the demand for 75 year old labour is going to be fairly limited, so these people are going to be on JSA instead.

This post has been edited by Dorkins: 22 March 2012 - 07:19 AM


#5 User is offline   Voice of Reason 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,729
  • Joined: 06-September 04

Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:24 AM

You can retire as early as you like.

If you expect to retire and have other people fund your living costs for you then it's not unreasonable that that's only for a few years of your life.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#6 User is online   SarahBell 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,655
  • Joined: 17-August 04

Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:14 AM

View PostVoice of Reason, on 22 March 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:

You can retire as early as you like.

If you expect to retire and have other people fund your living costs for you then it's not unreasonable that that's only for a few years of your life.



+1

You should also be allowed to be out of work too if that's what you want. But you shouldn't expect a life of luxury.
Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.

#7 User is offline   interestrateripoff 

  • Carry on banking.....
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 38,926
  • Joined: 24-June 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:16 AM

View PostChuffy Chuffnell, on 22 March 2012 - 01:19 AM, said:

Err... what's wrong with raising the retirement age? It should be in the 70s already.

I know it's annoying seeing the current lot retire so early, but they will quite literally pass on at some point and we can resume normality whereby a person cannot expect to live the latter third of their life doing fvck all.


Yep but it isn't, hence resentment from those expected to work until dead whilst those older get to retire.
Proof that Brown had repeated IMF / OECD / BIS warnings over house prices and did nothing!!!
Looting: The Economic Underworld Of Bankruptcy For Profit
The exponential growth of debt and the unsustainability of debt
The logic of HPI @ 10% YoY means your £100k house would be worth £1.38bn in 100 years
Paying down my mortgage with money found on the street

It's time to sue the Bank of England / Federal Reserve for GROSS NEGLIGENCE
If DEBT is the problem REPAYMENT is the solution or you default

"Northern unemployment is an acceptable price to pay for curbing southern inflation" Eddie George former Governor of the Bank of England

New digest on the credit crisis and economy Part2 Part 3

Posted Image

#8 User is offline   Tonkers 

  • HPC Senior Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,578
  • Joined: 15-April 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:22 AM

Now I will just get annoyed at all the malingerers skewing the life expectancy figures upwards.

#9 User is offline   happy_renting 

  • I'm right 51% of the time... beat that.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,377
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:36 AM

The older generation's legacy includes developments in health, immunology, surgery, biotechnics, road safety, health & safety legislation, etc.

And the older generation has also been paying the pensions of people older still.

The younger generation are moaning that they will live longer.

#10 User is offline   silver surfer 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,676
  • Joined: 19-April 07

Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:55 AM

View PostVoice of Reason, on 22 March 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:

You can retire as early as you like.

If you expect to retire and have other people fund your living costs for you then it's not unreasonable that that's only for a few years of your life.


+1
[color="#4169E1"]2013 Predictions (as at January 2013)

1. Nationwide & Halifax will show a nominal house price decline of 3% or less across 2013. Falls will be steeper for flats, starter homes, unemployment blackspots and in the North and Wales. Falls will be shallower for 3+ bedroom family homes and in London and the South East.

2. Land Registry and Acadametrics declines will be less than Nationwide and Halifax because they also include cash purchases, which will constitute a growing share of total house buying.

3. The base rate will remain exceptionally low in 2013.

4. RPI will be higher in 2013 than 2012, but by the end of the 2013 will be about 3-4%.

5. FTSE will be over 6500 by the end of 2013, corporate profits will grow, but driven by cost cutting and overseas earnings rather than domestic demand.

6. Owner occupancy rates in Britain will decline further as <25% deposit mortgages remain restricted.

7. Greece will still be in Europe by the end of 2013, but the underlying problems won't have gone away and at some later point they'll have to abandon the Euro.

8. Unemployment will finish the year at about 2.5 million. Median pay will fall further behind average pay as inequality continues to grow.

#11 User is offline   RufflesTheGuineaPig 

  • is fluffy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,894
  • Joined: 25-July 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:06 AM

View Posthappy_renting, on 22 March 2012 - 08:36 AM, said:

The younger generation are moaning that they will live longer.


They probably won't.

In fact, scientists are now suggesting that those in their 50s/60s may well outlive their children.
It's time to pay the piper. There is no magician who will magic away the debt. Someone is going to have to pay it. Bend over and prepare to make payment.

In this glorious nation of ours, if you work hard and keep your head down for 25 years then you too can aspire to own one-eighth of a one bedroom flat in Manchester.


My mum and day always tell me how important it is to save to buy a house. They should know, it took them nearly 6 months to save for theirs. As teenagers, they bought a 3 bed semi.

#12 User is offline   Bruce Banner 

  • Targ
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,226
  • Joined: 15-December 07

Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:09 AM

View PostVoice of Reason, on 22 March 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:

You can retire as early as you like.

If you expect to retire and have other people fund your living costs for you then it's not unreasonable that that's only for a few years of your life.



Yes, you can retire any time you like, I've been retired for four years and still have a few years to go before I receive a State pension. But, the State doesn't fund you until you reach State pension age.
.




See Below:

It looks to me like there is a massive coordinated attempt by the various VIs to engineer a spring bounce by press releases and trolling popular Internet forums such as this.

Following the reported 1.9% monthly rise from a government controlled lender and the (expected) 0.5% rate cut, this forum seems to be targeted by bulls, many joining in the last few day to talk up the market.

The general drift seems to be... 'Savings accounts are paying a pittance so get into property now and pick up a bargain'.

I wonder if the various EA and lenders associations are emailing their members, suggesting that joining this forum to talk up the market would be a good idea.


Note: The above was posted in late January 2009, the following is updated as and when required.





#13 User is offline   Olebrum 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,362
  • Joined: 17-March 08

Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:09 AM

I can't see life expectancy moving any way other than down from now on out.

Why exactly should people work into their 70s? Other than to pay off debts of Bankers of course.

This post has been edited by Olebrum: 22 March 2012 - 09:11 AM

The possession of a cow or two, with a hog, and a few geese, naturally exalts the peasant. . . . In sauntering after his cattle, he acquires a habit of indolence.

Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.

#14 User is offline   Grrrr I'm a tiger 

  • Are you a herbivore or carnivore?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24,228
  • Joined: 04-March 07

Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:16 AM

A picture of a carrot and donkey springs to mind.
it is, until it isn't tm

#15 User is offline   AThirdWay 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,093
  • Joined: 19-May 09

Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:20 AM

View PostOlebrum, on 22 March 2012 - 09:09 AM, said:

I can't see life expectancy moving any way other than down from now on out.



Why?

This post has been edited by AThirdWay: 22 March 2012 - 09:20 AM


  • (7 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users