House Price Crash forum: Tax On Houses On Its Way? - House Price Crash forum

Jump to content

powered by
  • (7 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tax On Houses On Its Way? Vince Cable today on dropping 50p tax rate Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   bankfeeder 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 370
  • Joined: 06-March 11

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:09 PM

Quote

Mr Cable said: "If that (the 50p rate) were to go, it should be replaced by taxation of wealth, because the wealthy people in the country have got to pay their share, particularly at a time of economic difficulty.

"How exactly that is configured is a detailed matter for negotiation. But that principle must be upheld, and a mansion tax actually is a very economically sensible way of doing it.

"But there are different ways of doing it. It can be done through local government as well as central government. And providing the principle is accepted - that taxation should be related to property - and there are vast numbers of extraordinarily valuable properties now around in the south of England, netting very large gains for their owners, many of whom come from abroad incidentally.


http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-17260348

But will they avoid the unintended (but perhaps desirable) consequence of all "wealth" being devalued to a value just below where it becomes taxable?

#2 User is offline   Gone baby gone 

  • So long, it's been a blast
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,383
  • Joined: 28-July 06

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:16 PM

View Postbankfeeder, on 06 March 2012 - 12:09 PM, said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-17260348

But will they avoid the unintended (but perhaps desirable) consequence of all "wealth" being devalued to a value just below where it becomes taxable?


They could also do something cunning like offsetting any PAYE paid that year against your "property tax"... which would mean regular homeowners largely avoided it, but non-doms / speculators couldn't.... <strokes chin>

#3 User is offline   cheeznbreed 

  • HPC Sandwich
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,544
  • Joined: 29-July 08

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:18 PM

Cable is a buffoon, and his pronouncements ought to be treated with the same seriousness as a demented uncle, even if now and again his ramblings approach coherance.

This post has been edited by cheeznbreed: 06 March 2012 - 12:18 PM

delusion, de.lu.sion; defn: A typical housing VI's assessment of the current state of the market, eg:

Added by Chris on 2012-03-17 11:46:02
I'm not saying that the market WILL pick up this year, but in my opinion 2012 is the last year of low house prices....

#4 User is offline   Gone baby gone 

  • So long, it's been a blast
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,383
  • Joined: 28-July 06

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:18 PM

I've always thought that land / property would be an obvious target for additional taxation. Very illiquid and the value reasonably easy to establish approximately.

#5 User is offline   Bruce Banner 

  • Targ
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,233
  • Joined: 15-December 07

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:19 PM

Why not just drop the 50% band and the 40% band and tax everyone at 20% but close all the loopholes so everyone pays it.
.




See Below:

It looks to me like there is a massive coordinated attempt by the various VIs to engineer a spring bounce by press releases and trolling popular Internet forums such as this.

Following the reported 1.9% monthly rise from a government controlled lender and the (expected) 0.5% rate cut, this forum seems to be targeted by bulls, many joining in the last few day to talk up the market.

The general drift seems to be... 'Savings accounts are paying a pittance so get into property now and pick up a bargain'.

I wonder if the various EA and lenders associations are emailing their members, suggesting that joining this forum to talk up the market would be a good idea.


Note: The above was posted in late January 2009, the following is updated as and when required.





#6 User is offline   Game_Over 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 7,906
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:25 PM

They could heavily tax second/third/fourth homes.

Oh wait

Most politicians, including Labour own at least two properties

So is that ever going to happen?

Answers on a postcard to..............

:blink:

#7 User is offline   R K 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 20,030
  • Joined: 12-August 07

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:27 PM

Vince was correct with this first time around.

Just add the tax to electricity/gas bills or higher rate council tax band.

#taxytaxy

"The problem with capitalism is that eventually you end up with everyone else's money" - RK

"We have now entered The Great Rebalancing 2007-20xx" - RK

#8 User is online   satch 

  • HPC Guru
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,222
  • Joined: 14-July 09

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:35 PM

View PostWhat, on 06 March 2012 - 12:18 PM, said:

I've always thought that land / property would be an obvious target for additional taxation. Very illiquid and the value reasonably easy to establish approximately.

But the very rich have lots of land and property and they will then have the inconvenience of finding a way round the tax via off shoring or creating trusts etc. so a non starter except for collecting more tax from the poorer people. The very rich don't pay tax.
Osborne says; “Printing money is the last resort of desperate governments when all other policies have failed.”

George Osborne December 2008; “Savers and pensioners are the forgotten victims … They are innocent bystanders and it’s simply not good enough for the Government to walk on by."

In his 1997 Budget speech, Gordon Brown said, "I will not allow house prices to get out of control and put at risk the sustainability of the future". He went on to say that he did not want a return to "instability, speculation and negative equity" of the 1980's and 1990's.

#9 User is online   RentingForever 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 757
  • Joined: 17-July 08

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:43 PM

Cue outraged stories in the Mail and Telegraph about poor old grannies and grandads in the south-east with big houses who would be liable for this tax "even though they're not rich"

#10 User is offline   TheCountOfNowhere 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,684
  • Joined: 05-October 07

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:48 PM

The only thing of any worth left top tax is houses....

#11 User is offline   phead 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 523
  • Joined: 05-April 07

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:53 PM

Bad idea. Politicians are like vultures, give them a new tax and they will eat it all till there's nothing left. This will be a property tax for everyone within 10 years if introduced.

Why not have more council tax bands, that would tax the top end evenly across the country.

#12 User is offline   Mildura 

  • HPC Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,220
  • Joined: 11-November 05

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:57 PM

View PostBruce Banner, on 06 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

Why not just drop the 50% band and the 40% band and tax everyone at 20% but close all the loopholes so everyone pays it.

Far too simple, straightforward and logical. They'd never think of something like that.
Yes I am an EA, but try not to hold it against me. The vast majority make the rest of us look bad.

#13 User is offline   Kurt Barlow 

  • I live on HPC!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,392
  • Joined: 11-September 07

Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:58 PM

View PostWhat, on 06 March 2012 - 12:18 PM, said:

I've always thought that land / property would be an obvious target for additional taxation. Very illiquid and the value reasonably easy to establish approximately.



Only if the legislation is robust enough. We already have a form of property tax called Council tax and local authorities like Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea have big problems getting Council Tax out of absentee owners (Russian Oligarchs, Radges, Nigerian oil execs ;) ) of properties worth £10m plus.

Remember - taxes are for ordinary people not the rich!

#14 User is offline   easy2012 

  • HPC Senior Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,233
  • Joined: 14-September 05

Posted 06 March 2012 - 01:01 PM

View PostKurt Barlow, on 06 March 2012 - 12:58 PM, said:

Only if the legislation is robust enough. We already have a form of property tax called Council tax and local authorities like Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea have big problems getting Council Tax out of absentee owners (Russian Oligarchs, Radges, Nigerian oil execs ;) ) of properties worth £10m plus.



I am wondering if you have any reference for those? Thought they can send in the baliff ?

#15 User is offline   cica 

  • HPC Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 950
  • Joined: 13-March 09

Posted 06 March 2012 - 01:04 PM

View PostBruce Banner, on 06 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:

Why not just drop the 50% band and the 40% band and tax everyone at 20% but close all the loopholes so everyone pays it.

+ progressive land tax.

Nice.

This post has been edited by cica: 06 March 2012 - 01:05 PM


  • (7 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users