London's Homeless Could Be Forced To Move As Far As Hull In the guardian
#1
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:49 PM
One Comment ; This 'initiative' is barbaric - It's creating social division, exclusion and a refugee crisis. A neoliberal nightmare.
No mention of private renters having to move with two months notice even if they have paid their rent on time to their BTL guardian reading LL.
George Osborne December 2008; “Savers and pensioners are the forgotten victims … They are innocent bystanders and it’s simply not good enough for the Government to walk on by."
In his 1997 Budget speech, Gordon Brown said, "I will not allow house prices to get out of control and put at risk the sustainability of the future". He went on to say that he did not want a return to "instability, speculation and negative equity" of the 1980's and 1990's.
#2
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:53 PM
satch, on 18 February 2012 - 09:49 PM, said:
One Comment ; This 'initiative' is barbaric - It's creating social division, exclusion and a refugee crisis. A neoliberal nightmare.
No mention of private renters having to move with two months notice even if they have paid their rent on time to their BTL guardian reading LL.
Sounds to me like the housing charities are warning that the homeless will soon have accomodation?
Polster: why did you vote labour?
Labour voter: because I hate Margaret Thatcher
Polster: how old were you when she left Downing st?
Labour voter: 3
(by Robo1968, posted 10/05/2010)
From BBC HYS 15/05/2009:
"Last year, my MP's second home claim was £5,000 more than my total salary and now I find out that he's trying to charge me for cleaning his swimming pool!"
#3
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:55 PM
This post has been edited by thecrashingisles: 18 February 2012 - 10:15 PM
#4
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:55 PM
Secure Long Term Tenancies For All - Don't Accept AST Crap
#5
#6
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:08 PM
Then they could say they'd been to Hull & back.
Wm. Blake: The Marriage of Heaven and Hell
"I've fallen off my chair, Brian"
J. Cleese et al.
#7
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:24 PM
There is an element of social cleansing about this initiative which is a bit unappealing though. Hull is other people, eh?
This post has been edited by StainlessSteelCat: 18 February 2012 - 10:26 PM
Typozay Find auction spelling mistakes
#8
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:29 PM
There are places far worse than Hull to be dealing with .....
#9
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:35 PM
StainlessSteelCat, on 18 February 2012 - 10:24 PM, said:
There is an element of social cleansing about this initiative which is a bit unappealing though. Hull is other people, eh?
There is indeed. I cut my monthly outgoings down from £1600 a month, to less than £600 a month by moving to a "declining Northern town." (not Hull). I've been social cleansed!
I shall certainly be filing a case at ECHR, demanding a council flat in Westminster next week!
Secure Long Term Tenancies For All - Don't Accept AST Crap
#10
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:35 PM
satch, on 18 February 2012 - 09:49 PM, said:
One Comment ; This 'initiative' is barbaric - It's creating social division, exclusion and a refugee crisis. A neoliberal nightmare.
No mention of private renters having to move with two months notice even if they have paid their rent on time to their BTL guardian reading LL.
It is an interesting argument. I have many friends who have moved south to get jobs in London. None of them have been able to move to central London as they simply cannot afford it, instead they have to commute at least an hour in what I can only describe as quite hideous conditions, on that hole in the ground some call the underground.
Whilst personally I would not like to move to Hull but that is not an argument for keeping people in accomodation that they themselves cannot afford. I know to the fine readers of the Guardian civilisation ends somewhere in the the mists of zone 3 but we need to move into the real world. Either rents have to fall or the workless have to move - in the same way as workers - into housing that they can afford....
#11
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:35 PM
#12
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:39 PM
lulu, on 18 February 2012 - 10:35 PM, said:
Whilst personally I would not like to move to Hull but that is not an argument for keeping people in accomodation that they themselves cannot afford. I know to the fine readers of the Guardian civilisation ends somewhere in the the mists of zone 3 but we need to move into the real world. Either rents have to fall or the workless have to move - in the same way as workers - into housing that they can afford....
Agreed and Hull benefits by becoming more vibrant. London benefits from being less overcrowded.
Secure Long Term Tenancies For All - Don't Accept AST Crap
#13
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:45 PM
make up for all those scottish mps fostered on us ...kirkcaldy ..perhaps
#14
Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:04 PM
#15
Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:09 PM
Large swathes of my town now closely resembles London and not sure it's for the better, I don't like to feel I'm abroad unless I actually am, it's unnerving to hear so many different languages and not understand most of them. Many of them seem unable to speak any English at all and stare blankly at you in shops if you say excuse me or after you etc, also many young children here speaking their native languages suggesting they are very much newcomers to the UK
London is spilling out into the provinces and I am not happy about it
Despite that, my money-grubbing slimy landlord has not found a new tenant to replace me - only 1 viewer in 5 weeks - no one's that desperate
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



Back to top
MultiQuote



