The disgruntled local officials ought to reflect on being shafted by top-down centralised diktat. Might knock a bit of sense into some of them to see how it is to be on the receiving end of their 'Government knows best' garbage for a change. If Labour treats its own like this, seems a fair assumption that everyone else has no chance. I hope this makes big news tomorrow.
If anyone has the rest of it, it would make a good read.
Of course, if any of these local associations grow a pair and refuse to do it, it might get interesting. Doubt that'll happen though.
Labour is forcing local parties to hand over their headquarters buildings, enabling it to shore up its precarious finances, The Times has learnt. The move allows the party, which has a deficit of millions of pounds, to raise loans against the properties. It has caused unrest in constituency offices, which have been told that they will be thrown out of Labour unless they agree to sign over their assets. Several have told The Times of their anger at having to give up ownership of the buildings. They have been told to transfer the deeds of the properties into a company controlled by the national party. Letters sent out to constituencies that oppose the ruling state that complying is a ďpre-condition of continued affiliation to the partyĒ. Peter Watt, who served as Labourís general secretary when the party narrowly avoided bankruptcy, said that it was right that local members helped to sort out its finances. ďI think [the party] is doing a terrific job at stabilising theÖ
This post has been edited by cheeznbreed: 18 January 2012 - 10:53 AM