Iom Sales Slump
#1
Posted 21 December 2010 - 12:59 PM
HOUSE sales in the island have slumped by 15 per cent over the past year, according to one estate agent.
And average Manx house prices have levelled off but remain way above those in the UK.
Cowley Groves director Graham Wilson said the average house price had fluctuated between £260,000 and £350,000 for the past three years and currently stands at £298,764 – but Nationwide quoted an average UK house price of £164,381 in October.
Mr Wilson admitted it had been a ‘very difficult year’.
He said the market was now heavily stacked in the buyer’s favour and vendors had to price their properties competitively if they wanted a sale.
‘Property sales during 2010 are down on 2009 regardless of price band and healthy new listings have resulted in a market that is heavily stacked in the buyer’s favour,’ he said.
‘Having said that, it’s not all doom and gloom as locally, properties are still selling, providing they are very keenly priced and meticulously presented.
‘This activity tends to be in the £200,000 to £400,000 price range and also tends to be the recently listed property as opposed to the older stock.’
Mr Wilson said the housing market had too many keenly priced properties for over-priced houses to achieve any interest whatsoever.
He said today’s buyer’s market attracted the inevitable cheeky offers but these had, so far, been quickly refused, unlike in the UK where prices were falling steadily due to desperate vendors having to sell to bargain hunters for well below market value.
Ian Lloyd, manager of Cowley Grove’s Ramsey office, said: ‘It has been impossible to predict – the market is all over the place.
‘This year there has been no pattern to sales at all.
‘We have sold properties close to £1 million and others close to £150,000. But without any doubt at all it is definitely a buyer’s market.’
Mr Lloyd said properties in the north offered better value for money and some sold this year had gone for in some cases hundreds of thousands of pounds less than if they had been in Douglas or Onchan.
And he said that properties requiring renovation had become one of the popular areas of sales as they were often valued under market price and attracted first time buyers as well as investors.
#2
Posted 30 December 2010 - 05:58 PM
The come overs who are going to,have already done so.Their market has been heavily tied in with the UK for a long time
#3
Posted 30 December 2010 - 06:07 PM
£4.2 mill gets you a small 5 bedder and 117 acres.(this is hardly going to be top grade ag land)
http://www.chrystals...t-Soderick-1031
Santon £645,000,you'd get better value in Surrey.
http://www.chrystals...of-645-000-1213
Douglas,2 bed apartment,nore how there's isn't a ferry at the termianl in the view they show....oprobably just hoping people view when the ben mchree is out.£600,000
http://www.chrystals...st-Douglas-1168
#4
Posted 31 December 2010 - 05:26 PM
Lets summarise a future for the Isle of Man..
1. The EU has determined that a central plank of the IOM's economic strategy of tax competition does not comply with their rules of what is and what isn't acceptable, and the UK Government is agreeing and effectively saying "sort it out, don't expect us to defend you on this!". This is because most businesses pay corporation tax at 0% so long as at least 55% of profits are distributed as dividends. IOM residents then pay personal income tax on that dividend but anyone not resident on the Isle of Man (i.e. parent companies, rich folk in the EU, don't, thus maing such companies attractive tax saving vehicles for The Monied. The IOM Government will be forced to act so expect the tax advantage removed if they can't produce another bit of clever smoke and mirrors.
2. The UK Government is continuing its scheduled reduction in the amount of money that the Isle of Man Government gets under the VAT sharing agreement, and the IOM Government hasn't exactly reduced its spending plans and is reluctant to reduce its spending at least until the current politicians have been voted back into office for another cushy 5 years.
3. The UK Government is under incredible pressure to reduce its own deficit and revising the VAT sharing agreement again has not been ruled out, especially as the reductions so far seem to have affected the IOM Government not a jot, while mass redundancies and programme cuts are going on in the UK.
4. The amount of money shared to the Isle of Man Government historically has allowed it to pursue its low personal and business tax agenda while spending like cost was no matter.
5. Base Interest rates are being predicted to rise to 5% (compared to 0.5% presently)
With the income from VAT share reducing, there is therefore good reason to expect rates of personal taxes and the level of the tax cap to increase, to keep the IOM Government in the black.
There is expectation that if the corporation tax rates (or dividend distribution rules) are revised to comply with EU rules about what is and isn't acceptable, the gains to the IOM Treasury may be wiped out by the effect of corporations leaving (employment especially).
There is also good reason to expect at some point the IOM Government will despite its attempts to protect the positions of incumbent politicians at the ballot box, be forced to face the fact that when the voters are expected to pay for a greater proportion of the IOM Government spending rather than the UK Government (via the VAT sharing agreement) that many will demand a reduction in government spending. With the way the IOM Government has structured its capital projects (a bit like a PFI) they may not be able to find savings there, as they continue to be contractually obligated to pay long after the project is supposedly completed... so they may look at mass redundancies, or benefits cuts (population 80k, benefits approx £200m), which again will be a big problem for the IOM economy as the IOM Government is a significant employer and eroding benefits like Mortgage Interest Relief At Source (or equivalent still available on the Isle of Man, I believe) will erode the disposable income available to people working on the Isle of Man to keep their mortgage lenders satisfied.
I therefore fully expect that many of the properties which had sat unsold for over a year on estate agent websites will continue to sit unsold, unless the sellers get real about their aspirational values. In the case of sellers who bought quite recently, they will likely have to accept a loss compared to the price they paid, but a smaller loss soon may well be better result than a bigger loss later).
I expect the numbers of properties coming to the market to continue to increase, and eventually the bubble will burst.
I expect rich tax migrants who thought they could buy an expensive flat to attempt to convince their own tax inspectors that they had moved to the Isle of Man, will regret that decision when they cannot liquidate their purchase easily or without a loss, and be annoyed when on one of their brief visits to keep up the charade, they meet their neighbours who had been installed by the Social Security because the property developer got fed up with waiting for buyer who could afford the asking price and went for a Social Security funded letting to keep the cash flow in the black.
This post has been edited by DeadLegs: 31 December 2010 - 05:38 PM
#5
Posted 31 December 2010 - 05:45 PM
I will add that I've personally noted properties given aspirational values of £350k being sold subject to contract for close to £100k less... but still not completing for months and months and months!!
#6
Posted 05 January 2011 - 09:21 AM
As an other point; I have a safe job here, all my friends are here, and due to rental/property prices im forced to live at home still.
(I could comfortably afford rent on a property now but I wouldn't be able to save a deposit to buy in the future - big negative to me)
This has led to me deliberating on whether I should move off island once I've saved a reasonable sum, I'm still undecided but it's definitely an option
And I know I'm not the only one considering it having discussed it with a few others!
This post has been edited by Gerinako: 05 January 2011 - 09:22 AM
#7
Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:15 AM
There also still appears to be a problem with some sellers still viewing the IOM property market as if it were still as it was five years ago, with properties coming on the market at outrageous asking prices despite significant problems of damp, roof problems and other significant defects. In those days there was a significant under supply of properties and even properties requiring many hundreds if not tens of thousands of pounds of work would sell at asking price.. BUT THERE IS NOW A GLUT OF UNSOLD PROPERTIES STAGNATING ON THE MARKET!
The estate agents like to claim that even if the prices were adjusted downwards that the sales would still not materialise but economics 101.. just as during periods of under supply the achieved prices rise to suit current market conditions, in a period of sustained over supply, prices fall to suit market conditions. There are buyers and sales to be achieved in a Buyer's market but not at the prices that suited a Seller's market!
The IOM Government has in its schizophrenic way begun to acknowledge its spending unsustainably with statements made opposing suggestions that fuel duty be cut by 5p a litre when before the recent UK budget it was being considered for the benefit of rural areas. Still, the minor redundancies they solemnly announce seem to be ones where job positions are lost without reductions in actual total headcount.. employees are moved from one department into empty posts in another department, and then the vacated post in the first department gets declared redundant and the press release declares redundancies arisen as a response to cost saving reorganisation of the civil service.
Incidentally after the recent manx budget, a few people spotted that while apparently dodging the EU's objection to the 0/10 corporation tax rules (they believe) by ending the requirement that at least 55% of company profits be distributed each year (so apparently removing the disadvantage any iom shareholder had relative to a non iom shareholder in taxation on dividends received), that since there is now no need to distribute dividends you may be able to use a company as a tax free savings vehicle -- expect the accountants working for the rich to notice that!). The top tax man says he will ensure adequate tax avoidance measures are in place to prevent this.. and if so, won't that just mean the EU will continue to have legitimate objection to the 0/10 corporation tax rules??
- the IOM government is in my opinion carrying on spending about £50m more than its income, using the reserves to fund the difference (at least until the election later this year). Unless the structural problems in the IOM Government taxing and spending strategy is addressed, eventually this reserve will be depleted. When the tax man comes looking for the money, and home owners cannot quickly liquidate their homes to move to a lower tax environment, or a more economically sustainable environment, the tax man will metaphorically be shooting fish in a barrel. Well they'll be able to send bailiffs in to seize properties for auction if tax bills are not paid voluntarily... Even forming a company to route all your income through may not work for long, as the IOM Government might introduce a land tax or equivalent (no, I've not heard any rumours but is it ruled out??). Why not once the politicians have been safely voted in for another term?
#8
Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:25 AM
Gerinako, on 05 January 2011 - 09:21 AM, said:
As an other point; I have a safe job here, all my friends are here, and due to rental/property prices im forced to live at home still.
(I could comfortably afford rent on a property now but I wouldn't be able to save a deposit to buy in the future - big negative to me)
This has led to me deliberating on whether I should move off island once I've saved a reasonable sum, I'm still undecided but it's definitely an option
And I know I'm not the only one considering it having discussed it with a few others!
I feel for you G. What the people of the IOM really need are more affordable homes for rent, since that would allow proper mobility onto and off the island when needs require it. Corpy homes for families that need corpy homes, not for families where every adult is in a well paid job, has a nice car, goes on lovely holidays each year, buys all the current gadgets, has a sky subscription, and even owns a couple of other properties for let. But those people have votes and are grateful to the politicians who make things so!
#9
Posted 11 May 2011 - 02:56 PM
#10
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:27 AM
5% Cashback on sale price on completion.
#11
Posted 15 June 2011 - 08:03 AM
#12
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:38 PM
Gerinako, on 01 June 2011 - 10:27 AM, said:
5% Cashback on sale price on completion.
..don't see why this might be better than just accepting a lower offer... as I presume accepting a lower offer means less estate agent fees, lower borrowing, smaller conveyancing fees, lower stamp duty.. and one less round of money changing hands.
#13
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:14 PM
Pull out while there's time...
#14
Posted 01 September 2011 - 09:15 AM
However word from a relevant internet gossip site is that estate agents are RAISING their valuations on properties that are not selling! I suspect there are still enough estate agents who have a rather unconventional view of the way prices move in a depressed, stagnant and over supplied market.
#15
Posted 01 September 2011 - 02:08 PM
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help

Back to top
MultiQuote
