Guardian.co.uk 29.05.08 FP comments
#1
Posted 29 May 2008 - 03:18 PM
Cap'n, you cannae change the laws of... Economics!
"If they raise rates we're toast. If they don't its BECAUSE we're toast" Jonathan Davis Sky News March 2011
#2
#3
Posted 29 May 2008 - 03:32 PM
Quote
Don't we?
(I understand the need for sensitivity but still....)
Eventually, the ensuing inflation leads to a recession or worse, often because central banks are forced to clamp down...I regret that the US may not be wholly immune to it."
Alan Greenspan in "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World", 2007.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it"
Upton Sinclair
#4
Posted 29 May 2008 - 03:56 PM
-------------------------
#5
Posted 29 May 2008 - 04:29 PM
#6
Posted 29 May 2008 - 06:57 PM
Howard Archer said:
Mortgage Equity Withdrawal, anyone?
FP said:
Whaddaya mean? This is a small island...there's concrete everywhere...
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=e...0.6427&z=11
This post has been edited by jimmy_joe: 29 May 2008 - 06:58 PM
#7
Posted 29 May 2008 - 07:36 PM
jimmy_joe, on May 29 2008, 07:57 PM, said:
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=e...0.6427&z=11
Wrong, this is a large island. Anyone who drives about knows that there is countryside everywhere and only concrete in a comparatively small percentage.
Edited to say: Sorry, only looked at your link after posting
This post has been edited by Nickolarge: 29 May 2008 - 07:39 PM
#8
Posted 29 May 2008 - 09:02 PM
Quote
.
Disapointing
.
ST
The banks are licenced by the government to extract profit from their slice of the monopoly in the issue of the state mandated means of exchange. Bankers bonuses like MPs expenses are distractions from theft and violence at a systematic level. -- ST
-----
You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. -- Ayn Rand
#9
Posted 29 May 2008 - 09:48 PM
Super Ted, on May 29 2008, 10:02 PM, said:
.
Disapointing
.
ST
I echo your disappointment. Personally I do want to see prices crash, because then, perhaps I'll be able to trade up, and also might help lead us away from an economy based on financial twaddle and into a real economy based on making stuff.
#10
Posted 29 May 2008 - 09:57 PM
This comment makes FP's analysis much more persuasive and (appear) more objective ie. analysis detached from personal preference.
Much better than the Radio 5 blow up with Nicki Campbell a month or so back!
The Guardian is patently 'on side'. You need to get back on the BBC now....
But more generally - not even Savills or the CML tried to pretend that the downturn is a mere market blip in the article. I suppose they are now at the point where they are most concerned about appearing stupid if they keep pretending to ignore reality. And vendors will no longer be able to ignore reality either. Come on!
#11
Posted 29 May 2008 - 10:05 PM
heatonfan, on May 29 2008, 10:57 PM, said:
This comment makes FP's analysis much more persuasive and (appear) more objective ie. analysis detached from personal preference.
Much better than the Radio 5 blow up with Nicki Campbell a month or so back!
The Guardian is patently 'on side'. You need to get back on the BBC now....
But more generally - not even Savills or the CML tried to pretend that the downturn is a mere market blip in the article. I suppose they are now at the point where they are most concerned about appearing stupid if they keep pretending to ignore reality. And vendors will no longer be able to ignore reality either. Come on!
If you want analysis to appear detached from personal preference the trick is to avoid saying either
"We don't want house prices to fall",
or
"We do want house prices to fall".
Either is stating a personal preference.
I really don't want to knock FP though. He is doing sterling work in putting the "pro-crash" case.
#12
Posted 29 May 2008 - 10:16 PM
What about the liar loans, the reckless predatory lending practices and the buy to let implosion? You should also mention the incoming hyperinflationary collapse of the financial system as the government and BOE attemtps to monetize bankruptcy to keep the housing market afloat.
#13
Posted 30 May 2008 - 12:45 AM
#14
Posted 30 May 2008 - 10:18 AM
Optobear, on May 29 2008, 09:48 PM, said:
It is this so-called "financial twaddle" that you appear to advocate that has benefited the UK whether you like it or not. It's funny how everyone is shouting about the negatives that the financial industry can bring about when there is a downturn. You want us to move back to a manufacturing-based economy? I sure as hell don't.
A healthy correction in house prices and certain other areas of the financial environment is welcome. Speculation has got out of control, that is unquestionable. But, your statement is naive I'm afraid to say.
#15
Posted 30 May 2008 - 11:32 AM
Is that a nod to Kirsty, and her eating her hat quote?
Free to collect, like ebay but you dont pay, you just have to collect
QUOTE (sledgehead)If you make a living from something, you are a professional something: it is your profession. You could bake dog turds and flog them as ornaments. If that's how you make your living, you ARE a professional dog-turd baker. Period
QUOTE (Rolling Stone 13th July 2000)The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.
QUOTE (Soon Not a Chain Retailer @ Aug 30 2009, 01:03 AM) Society should provide trampolines not safety nets.
QUOTE (GordonBrown Jan 27 2008 (warning about the coming inflation?))if you don't get the skills you wont get a job
if you get the skills you will earn ALOT of money
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



Back to top
MultiQuote









