Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Mr & Mrs Average In Ni


Shotoflight

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

.Therefore the average income of households that own their own home is generally, if not always higher than the average income of the nation.

You obviously have no idea what the benefit entitlements are for a young single woman with a few children and HB can be. (Forgetting the fee things we "average earners" have to pay like dentists, public transport, childcare etc) If anything I'd say many have more money their working counterpart.

That's the reason the coalition is introducing a 25k benefits cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 959
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442

The average income figure is, as it says an average income of the nation.

The split of tenancy of the nation is roughly 70% home ownership (small o) and 30% rental. This may well move towards the 60/40 position in the future.

The 70%, or so that make up the home ownership generally come from the 70% of higher earners. Therefore the average income of households that own their own home is generally, if not always higher than the average income of the nation. That is sad, but no doubt true. The same can also be said for car ownership.

There is not a big difference between the monthly mortgage payments and the rental costs. Of course there are extra running costs etc. However that is the choice people have to make.

Valid point. And worth another airing.

That said, i think we either go with an average or we dont, with all its flaws. That's why I used dual income, in homage to one of your other oft made observations. We could all nibble round the edges in this scenario to suit our views. I could perhaps have included the average household debt for 'home owners', but don't know that figure and tried to keep things simple.

Many are left money. Many get claims or have other income sources - some households may have three incomes. Many have to leave work through illness, split up, divorce, pay maintenance for earlier sprogs, have no children or are single, or have already lost a house to the ex-wife. The example is, as I have admitted, broad brush.

On your point, rental at 500 or 600 per month is then likely to be equally as painful, if not more so as earnings will tend to be less and if no car, public transport isn't cheap. Jobs may also be less secure, in this scenario and whilst interest rises won't impact on the rent (inflation will impact on costs) it will rest on the whim of the landlord (influenced by market rates and HB levels) with a (UK) suggestion it will rise 20% in 5 yrs (which we both find unrealistic but who knows). Of course saving for a deposit for a house in this scenario would be extremely difficult - a bit of a catch 22 - and one would speculate not conducive to a 'healthy' housing market.

As I say, the assumptions are wide open to challenge and the average argument can be challenged. The conclusion though, that something has to give regarding income, outgoings and the price of houses, can't.

In my personal opinion.

Sorry - edited to add. I didn't put in an average income figure (because of the disagreement on what that actually is) The point was to show what you needed to earn to comfortably manage your outgoings with the caveat that my expenditure estimates were on the conservative side, for 'home owners'.

Actually it was the car insurance story that got me thinking/annoyed. Talk about unintended consequences...........

Edited by Shotoflight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443

The average income figure is, as it says an average income of the nation.

The split of tenancy of the nation is roughly 70% home ownership (small o) and 30% rental. This may well move towards the 60/40 position in the future.

The 70%, or so that make up the home ownership generally come from the 70% of higher earners. Therefore the average income of households that own their own home is generally, if not always higher than the average income of the nation. That is sad, but no doubt true. The same can also be said for car ownership.

There is not a big difference between the monthly mortgage payments and the rental costs. Of course there are extra running costs etc. However that is the choice people have to make.

A very simplistic but flawed analysis. The attached extract from a research report published in 2005 clearly shows that there are high proportions of home ownership in the lowest wage bands e.g pensioners being the most obvious class of home owner on low income. The last I read, they held about £750billion worth of property. Some of the lowest bands actually have higher proportions of home ownership than some higher earning bands

It also fails to take into account the earnings percentile profile which shows that only about 1/3 of males in full-time employment earn more than the average for that group supporting what we all know that the distribution curve for earnings is significantly skewed from the normal i.e. the very highest earners earn significanlty more than the average.

There is actually just as much evidence to suggest that the average income of all home owners is less than the average wage of those in employment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444

A very simplistic but flawed analysis. The attached extract from a research report published in 2005 clearly shows that there are high proportions of home ownership in the lowest wage bands e.g pensioners being the most obvious class of home owner on low income. The last I read, they held about £750billion worth of property. Some of the lowest bands actually have higher proportions of home ownership than some higher earning bands

It also fails to take into account the earnings percentile profile which shows that only about 1/3 of males in full-time employment earn more than the average for that group supporting what we all know that the distribution curve for earnings is significantly skewed from the normal i.e. the very highest earners earn significanlty more than the average.

There is actually just as much evidence to suggest that the average income of all home owners is less than the average wage of those in employment.

Well yes ofcourse there are a large proportion of pensioners as home owners. Might I hazard a guess and suggest that they just might of bought their house and mostly paid for it during their working life.

Actually, if you look at your table, from 2003, it shows that only from the mid table up (£400 per week to £900 per week) do you get % of home ownership that is over the 70% ownership of the nation. In earnings below that the % ownership is below average. I think few would expect otherwise.

Edited by BelfastVI
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

Well yes ofcourse there are a large proportion of pensioners as home owners. Might I hazard a guess and suggest that they just might of bought their house and mostly paid for it during their working life.

Actually, if you look at your table, from 2003, it shows that only from the mid table up (£400 per week to £900 per week) do you get % of home ownership that is over the 70% ownership of the nation. In earnings below that the % ownership is below average. I think few would expect otherwise.

Sorry, I've have absolutely no idea what your point is but please don't feel the need to explain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

Sorry, I've have absolutely no idea what your point is but please don't feel the need to explain.

Perhaps If we called Mr and Mrs Average "The Squeezed Middle" (as the policy makers are fond of doing) it might help to smooth/narrow the areas for discussion.

I think it is widely acknowledged the cost of living in NI is higher (car insurance!), wages are lower, health is poorer - probably die younger too than the UK average. Little competition in electricity (especially annoying for businesses), high personal dependence on heating oil (something like 60% in NI against 30% UK average).

Living in Northern Ireland is bad for your long-term health

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/living-in-northern-ireland-is-bad-for-your-longterm-health-16044447.html

We are all aware of the "not available in NI" offers or free UK delivery EXCEPT...........

One of IDB's (now INI) main plank for promoting Foreign Direct Investment, not that long ago, was that NI was a low wage economy. They thought this was brilliant, and chimed with the type of businesses they wanted to attract ie call centres. Short sighted to say the least. This aspect is now subsumed in the term "competitive cost base" once Selective Financial Assistance (what we call a grant) has been factored in. Though, sadly, their 'pipe' is now blocked. Dripping but not flowing.

They'll have a harder sell when Continental pull out of Belfast 'international' Airport due to crippling Airport Passenger Duty

I think I recall people saying before the housing boom " ahh yes it's dearer there but housing costs are low" as a sort of mitigation for business. That time has long since passed. High(er) rents and housing costs must act as a powerful disincentive for investors at the best of times, but especially when most other things (except wages) are also higher. Which is where the grants, and the level of grants comes in.

You'ld think Sammy would be happy to see a cost base reducing - I don't detect any establishment enthusiasm for lower house prices/housing costs (except everyone loves cheap mortgages).

As for a highly educated workforce and leading by example, well our Deputy First Minister (ex Education Minister) has little by the way of educational qualifications and our First Minister was an Estate Agent - both with chequered backgrounds.

Just goes to show, though - we voted for them!

Anyway, I don't think NI house prices are going to rise anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447

Good thread - liking the analysis. Some realism for a change and bringing the 'affordability' debate into real life context.

Havings kids is the expensive bit. At least with the mortage the proportion of salary needed to service the cost generally diminshes with time through inflation. Some of us more mature posters will know that the opposite applies to kids and the growth in costs seems to be exponential as they progress through the teenage years!

All this realism can get very sobering at times - no wonder 'extend and pretend' is so popular.

Things today are very different to 40 odd yeas ago.....'extend and pretend' was not an option, you brought your kids up within your means according to your earning power there was no other way......there was not the variety and choice of food in the shops like there is today flown in from all over the world....if you couldn't afford butter you ate margarine or dripping....if you couldn't afford meat you bought a smaller piece of cheaper stewing steak and bulked it up with potatoes and other cheaper seasonal vegetables.....houses were cheaper to buy but were out of the reach of most, rents were more reasonable and secure, the price of homes were held steady by wage inflation, where today they have risen with credit inflation......another good thing about those days was there was always a paid job if you were prepared to work, another thing is 'what you saw is what you got'.....today ' what you see does not necessarily mean it has been worked for or paid for'. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

Sorry, I've have absolutely no idea what your point is but please don't feel the need to explain.

Sorry but I feel I need to.

I suggested that the 70%, or so of housing in private ownership where generally purchased by people enjoying a higher payment profile than the nation as a whole.

You argued that this was not true, offering the fact that pensioners, on low or no income represented a large proportion of the home ownership group.

I, whilst acknowledging your point, further pointed out that these pensioners more than likely purchased, and paid down their mortgage before they reached retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

Essential Expenses

Mort £640

Bldg & Contents Ins £20 I pay £140 a year for mine

Food £320 No kids, but I reckon I could get my food budget in at £250 easily with sprogs

Clothes £100 Personally, I would spend £100 in a year in clothes!

Electric/oil/gas £80 £50 a month for me

TV licence/Line Rental/Internet £35

Mobile phones x2 £30

Car Ins £75 Mine is £700 a year and I only have two years no claims and am a young male

Car Tax £15 A lot of folks have diesels....

Car Maint (tyres/service/MOT) £40 Most people don't even service their car!

Car Fuel (social & work) £100 I commute more than most and my fuel bill is almost half this

Social Life (fags/booze/mags/papers/bet/eat out/cinema/swim/zoo) £100

School x 2 (Lunch £3 daily, uniform, shoes, trips) £150

Work x 2 (clothes, odd lunch, coffee) say less than £2 daily £80

Ocassional expenses (replacement/upgrade TV/PC etc) £40

House maint internal/external, furniture, decorating £50

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410

Theres a massive amount of scamming, fraud and black economy in NI. I see it everywhere, from housewives driving X5s on business leases, to doing cash jobs, to misapproriating grants, to not declaring rental income. And thats just my neighbours. That scews things quite a bit IMO. Theres lots of people on big money. I heard just the other day of a woman that had spent 4grand on curtains for a room.

I couldn't agree more! I used to live in the east end of London, but the level of tax evasion and fraud here tops it completely and seems to pervade everywhere in society. When I first moved to Northern Ireland, I rented a house off a landlord who had somewhere in the region of 50 properties. He wasn't paying any income tax on these earnings and had declared all 50 properties to be empty in order to avoid the rates charge. When I eventually bought a house, I need to get a few tradespeople in to do some jobs. People were absolutely shocked that I used proper VAT-registered tradespeople to do the work I needed. The general consensus was that I could get a friend of a friend who was on welfare and currently sitting down the pub to do the work under the counter.

I could go on, and on, and on with other similar stories.

Edited by NuBrit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411

Essential Expenses

Mort £640

Bldg & Contents Ins £20 I pay £140 a year for mine

Food £320 No kids, but I reckon I could get my food budget in at £250 easily with sprogs

Clothes £100 Personally, I would spend £100 in a year in clothes!

Electric/oil/gas £80 £50 a month for me

TV licence/Line Rental/Internet £35

Mobile phones x2 £30

Car Ins £75 Mine is £700 a year and I only have two years no claims and am a young male

Car Tax £15 A lot of folks have diesels....

Car Maint (tyres/service/MOT) £40 Most people don't even service their car!

Car Fuel (social & work) £100 I commute more than most and my fuel bill is almost half this

Social Life (fags/booze/mags/papers/bet/eat out/cinema/swim/zoo) £100

School x 2 (Lunch £3 daily, uniform, shoes, trips) £150

Work x 2 (clothes, odd lunch, coffee) say less than £2 daily £80

Ocassional expenses (replacement/upgrade TV/PC etc) £40

House maint internal/external, furniture, decorating £50

Some will pay less, some will pay more.

House Insurance will vary by what you are insuring - value of contents etc.

Car insurance average was quoted in the press at £920 Average

You could feed a family of four for £60 per week - £15 ea, £2 per day per person??

Electric oil gas - family of four not single. Ditto clothes - you would clothe a family of four for £2 per week?? Nevermind school uniforms?

Diesels pay road tax (perhaps lower) are more expensive to buy initially and, usually, dearer to fix

People don't service, mot or put tyres on their car?

You commute "more than most" and your fuel bill is £12 per week? I live 20 miles from belfast and a bus ticket is almost £40 - again the scenario is for two people working.

You obviously don't have children, or many clothes. Perhaps you didn't understand the premise of the thread either.

Are you an Estate Agent, by any chance?

Thanks for your contribution.

Edited by Shotoflight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412

I don’t think it was intended that everyone put a statement of affairs up but I thought I would say that yours looks very optimistic. You should take a look over at MSE. They would love you there. Under £250 for food with kids? You don’t buy clothes, heat the house, service the car, and put about 35 litres of fuel in the car a month (where do you travel to? The end of the drive and back?). I applaud you. That’s frugal.

Sorry did realise Shoto covered all this.

Edited by 2buyornot2buy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413

Perhaps you didn't understand the premise of the thread either.

Are you an Estate Agent, by any chance?

Thanks for your contribution.

I have to agree with Shotoflight on this one ...

Essential Expenses

Mort £640

Bldg & Contents Ins £20 I pay £140 a year for mine - £11 a month for buildings and contents insurance - are you being serious?? What are you insuring a tent????Food £320 No kids, but I reckon I could get my food budget in at £250 easily with sprogs - Easily for £250, based on what??? Are you going to feed them pasta and rice everyday?? I have 2 kids so speaking from experience this is nonsense

Clothes £100 Personally, I would spend £100 in a year in clothes! - Good luck with that when you have kids.

Electric/oil/gas £80 £50 a month for me - For both ... wise up! You must never be in the house then. You would be lucky to pay less than £70/£80 a month on heating costs alone at current prices. It costs over £500 for 900 litres of oil and the average family would prob get at least 2 fills a year.

TV licence/Line Rental/Internet £35

Mobile phones x2 £30

Car Ins £75 Mine is £700 a year and I only have two years no claims and am a young male - running 2 cars could easily come to £75 a month

Car Tax £15 A lot of folks have diesels.... I have just bought a diesel - it cost me £130 for the yearly tax. Not much less than quoted. If you can only afford 6 months then it costs 10% more so that would make up the difference

Car Maint (tyres/service/MOT) £40 Most people don't even service their car! - Nonsense, booking the flipping MOT alone costs £30. Nevermind new tyres, replacing exhausts, brakes, oil etc when they need done.

Car Fuel (social & work) £100 I commute more than most and my fuel bill is almost half this - Seriously ... more than most on £50, are you using red diesel???

I'm not for getting into a full disclosure of specific personal details on this forum but I can relate to the points made on this topic first hand. If you cant then there is no point in 'speculating' what you feel you can get by on.

Edited by tinbin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

I have to agree with Shotoflight on this one ...

Essential Expenses

Mort £640

Bldg & Contents Ins £20 I pay £140 a year for mine - £11 a month for buildings and contents insurance - are you being serious?? What are you insuring a tent????Food £320 No kids, but I reckon I could get my food budget in at £250 easily with sprogs - Easily for £250, based on what??? Are you going to feed them pasta and rice everyday?? I have 2 kids so speaking from experience this is nonsense

Clothes £100 Personally, I would spend £100 in a year in clothes! - Good luck with that when you have kids.

Electric/oil/gas £80 £50 a month for me - For both ... wise up! You must never be in the house then. You would be lucky to pay less than £70/£80 a month on heating costs alone at current prices. It costs over £500 for 900 litres of oil and the average family would prob get at least 2 fills a year.

TV licence/Line Rental/Internet £35

Mobile phones x2 £30

Car Ins £75 Mine is £700 a year and I only have two years no claims and am a young male - running 2 cars could easily come to £75 a month

Car Tax £15 A lot of folks have diesels.... I have just bought a diesel - it cost me £130 for the yearly tax. Not much less than quoted. If you can only afford 6 months then it costs 10% more so that would make up the difference

Car Maint (tyres/service/MOT) £40 Most people don't even service their car! - Nonsense, booking the flipping MOT alone costs £30. Nevermind new tyres, replacing exhausts, brakes, oil etc when they need done.

Car Fuel (social & work) £100 I commute more than most and my fuel bill is almost half this - Seriously ... more than most on £50, are you using red diesel???

I'm not for getting into disclosing specific personal details on forums but I can relate to the points made on this topic first hand. If you cant then there is no point in 'speculating' what you feel you can get by on.

I mistakenly thought the title "Mr & Mrs Average" was a bit of a clue, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

Essential Expenses

Mort £640

Bldg & Contents Ins £20 I pay £140 a year for mine

Food £320 No kids, but I reckon I could get my food budget in at £250 easily with sprogs

Clothes £100 Personally, I would spend £100 in a year in clothes!

Electric/oil/gas £80 £50 a month for me

TV licence/Line Rental/Internet £35

Mobile phones x2 £30

Car Ins £75 Mine is £700 a year and I only have two years no claims and am a young male

Car Tax £15 A lot of folks have diesels....

Car Maint (tyres/service/MOT) £40 Most people don't even service their car!

Car Fuel (social & work) £100 I commute more than most and my fuel bill is almost half this

Social Life (fags/booze/mags/papers/bet/eat out/cinema/swim/zoo) £100

School x 2 (Lunch £3 daily, uniform, shoes, trips) £150

Work x 2 (clothes, odd lunch, coffee) say less than £2 daily £80

Ocassional expenses (replacement/upgrade TV/PC etc) £40

House maint internal/external, furniture, decorating £50

Some will pay less, some will pay more.

House Insurance will vary by what you are insuring - value of contents etc.

Car insurance average was quoted in the press at £920 Average

You could feed a family of four for £60 per week - £15 ea, £2 per day per person??

Electric oil gas - family of four not single. Ditto clothes - you would clothe a family of four for £2 per week?? Nevermind school uniforms?

Diesels pay road tax (perhaps lower) are more expensive to buy initially and, usually, dearer to fix

People don't service, mot or put tyres on their car?

You commute "more than most" and your fuel bill is £12 per week? I live 20 miles from belfast and a bus ticket is almost £40 - again the scenario is for two people working.

You obviously don't have children, or many clothes. Perhaps you didn't understand the premise of the thread either.

Are you an Estate Agent, by any chance?

Thanks for your contribution.

Hey now, there's no need to get testy. You posted this thread on a public forum, if you don't like the responses, that's your problem. You're underestimating how frugal people are and what other means that they have to reduce their costs. Things like childcare costs are expensive, but there are always aunties/grandmothers/friends/flexi-time solutions to reduce this. Food costs are easy - I buy things like potatoes, eggs and fruit directly from source for half nothing. I brew my own beer (delicious may I add) for buttons in my garage. If money is short, people will simply not heat their house or just not go out for the weekend.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416

I'm not for getting into a full disclosure of specific personal details on this forum but I can relate to the points made on this topic first hand. If you cant then there is no point in 'speculating' what you feel you can get by on.

Oh come on now, you're just making up things too. No one mentioned a second car and no one said anything about clothing a family of four on £100 a year in this example.

I don't have children, but I know lots of people that do and they all manage to get by with their mortgages and associated costs and still have enough for the foreign holiday and new widescreen tv's and what-have-you's. The people who I know of in financial trouble are more likely not to be home owners. From what I can see, there's a huge amount of people living at home who are up to their eyeballs in debt thanks to car loans, credit cards, store cards, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

The thread is about averages, not individuals.

The fuel costs are interesting so a bit of research - Apparently new petrol cars average 42 mpg and diesels 48 mpg (lets say 45) and the average miles travelled in the UK are 8,430 which seems a bit low so I have given 12,000 as a further example. At £1.40 a litre, a gallon = £6.36

Miles 8,430 12,000

/45 (mpg) 187 267

x £6.36 1189 1698

/12 (months) £99.08 £141.50

So anything from £100 to £140 per month for 1 car simply for fuel.

http://assets.dft.gov.uk/statistics/releases/national-travel-survey-2010/nts2010-01.pdf

http://www.nextgreencar.com/petdiesel.php

Edited by Shotoflight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

Also, it's a complete fallacy to say that Mr. and Mrs. Average should have a mortgage of £150k. 30% of people in Northern Ireland don't own a home at all. Also, many people who do own homes, bought them from the council years ago for buttons and probably have the mortgage paid off. The number of people who actually took out £150k mortgages during the bubble years as a percentage of all households is very small. Indeed, statistics seem to suggest that just over 20,000 households (about 3% of all households) were unlucky enough to have bought when property prices were in various stages of silliness in Northern Ireland (2005-present) - http://www.dsdni.gov.uk/january_-_march_2011_internet_copy.doc The real figure is probably even less than that as cash purchases or purchases with high deposits are in that figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419

Oh come on now, you're just making up things too. No one mentioned a second car and no one said anything about clothing a family of four on £100 a year in this example.

I don't have children, but I know lots of people that do and they all manage to get by with their mortgages and associated costs and still have enough for the foreign holiday and new widescreen tv's and what-have-you's. The people who I know of in financial trouble are more likely not to be home owners. From what I can see, there's a huge amount of people living at home who are up to their eyeballs in debt thanks to car loans, credit cards, store cards, etc.

You got me ... I'm making things up.

I really live in a castle with a surrounding moat with sharks in it. I swan about all day in my robe drinking red wine, planning my next beach holiday whilst flicking channels on my widescreen TV in my cinema room.

... Life's a breeze when Mr Visa and Mrs Mastercard pick up the tab. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420

Also, it's a complete fallacy to say that Mr. and Mrs. Average should have a mortgage of £150k. 30% of people in Northern Ireland don't own a home at all. Also, many people who do own homes, bought them from the council years ago for buttons and probably have the mortgage paid off. The number of people who actually took out £150k mortgages during the bubble years as a percentage of all households is very small. Indeed, statistics seem to suggest that just over 20,000 households (about 3% of all households) were unlucky enough to have bought when property prices were in various stages of silliness in Northern Ireland (2005-present) - http://www.dsdni.gov.uk/january_-_march_2011_internet_copy.doc The real figure is probably even less than that as cash purchases or purchases with high deposits are in that figure.

The point of the thread is fictional. It was to show what the situation would be like now for a couple, both working with 2 kids who buy an average house now at £150k, at todays prices per the UUJ survey. With a 10% deposit paid upfront, all furnishings and no debt carry over (pretty unrealistic and conservative as stated before).

The conclusion (well mine, at any rate) is that there is a disconnect between the average current house price and affordability for a 2 income household with 2 kids. I chose this scenario as 2 incomes ("household income") are stated as the scenario for most housebuyers by some on this board. I also ranged childminding costs from zero to a conservative £200.

None of this is worth getting excited over.

Houses are still too dear. Just thought it might put some flesh on the bones of all these averages.

Perhaps I'm not very good at explaining myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421

Ok, my mistake.

The UUJ report currently states that the average house is £137,814 btw.

Also, it must be skewed because they have the average price in the Craigavon borough at £138,125. That may be an average price, but it certainly isn't the cost of a standard 3 bedroom-semi in a decent area, which from what I can see can be had for about £100k, and that's based on current asking prices and before a discount which you would expect in today's market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422

Ok, my mistake.

The UUJ report currently states that the average house is £137,814 btw.

Also, it must be skewed because they have the average price in the Craigavon borough at £138,125. That may be an average price, but it certainly isn't the cost of a standard 3 bedroom-semi in a decent area, which from what I can see can be had for about £100k, and that's based on current asking prices and before a discount which you would expect in today's market.

Craigavon borough = HOLE.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423

Ok, my mistake.

The UUJ report currently states that the average house is £137,814 btw.

Also, it must be skewed because they have the average price in the Craigavon borough at £138,125. That may be an average price, but it certainly isn't the cost of a standard 3 bedroom-semi in a decent area, which from what I can see can be had for about £100k, and that's based on current asking prices and before a discount which you would expect in today's market.

The validity of the UUJ report is a whole other argument, which has been had before and I agree with your point above. As I said, figures used were blunt in all respects - average house a little cheaper/debt a little more??. A rough idea, that's all.

I also take on board your point about the ability of people to be frugal and cut their cloth, and many do. Not all have this outlook though and will burn both jets till they hit a brick wall. Lots can't or won't face reality or countenance a drop in lifestyle or "standards".

You've livened up this thread and got people thinking, even yourself I'm sure, which is what it's all about. So thanks for the effort.

A single person on one average income would, i suspect, find the average house really unaffordable, I would have thought, especially younger people. In fact, the difficulty for younger people now is getting and retaining an income. I suppose the best bet is shacked up, no sprogs, 2 incomes (and hope it lasts!) which for many is probably neither practical, ideal nor even likely.

A couple of other very interesting points you make. Council house sales fell off a cliff from over 1,500 a year I think, to 60 a couple of years ago. Prices too high, new stricter rules/less discount, and a dwintling number of houses left. This is one less route for people to move up to an "average" house or become a 'home owner'.

Regarding food - The Sunday times said that in the larger supermarkets 42p of every pound spent goes on offers (an 8% increase on 2007) This figure rises to 54% on big brands. I'll quote "consumers have less money to spend and deep seated fears about their finances. For the first time in decades, this fear and lack of confidence are having an impact on food sales - previously the only recession-proof sector in retail.

The home brew must save you a fortune. I tried it years ago but mine tasted of TCP. (forgot to rinse the barrel out!!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424

More Frugality - collective winding in of necks.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/nonfood-sales-dent-retail-figures-2349651.html

Retailers confirmed another bleak month of trading today amid a continued squeeze on those firms selling clothing, furniture and electrical goods.

In a report showing contrasting fortunes for food and non-food retailers, the British Retail Consortium (BRC) said sales were down 0.6% on a like-for-like basis in August compared with the same month a year ago.

Poor consumer confidence and high inflation were blamed for the lacklustre performance

Helen Dickinson, head of retail at accountancy firm KPMG, which helped compile the survey, added: "The weaker sectors are really struggling.

"For non-food, the picture is disheartening with one of the worst monthly results of the year thus far."

Clothing sales were slightly below a year ago as retailers continued to see shoppers focus on essentials and promotion-driven items

BRC director general Stephen Robertson said: "Consumers are more and more comfortable using the internet to compare prices and it seems a higher number of online visits are being translated into sales.

"It's still the case that customers are motivated by value and are seeking out bargains and discounts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Also, it's a complete fallacy to say that Mr. and Mrs. Average should have a mortgage of £150k. 30% of people in Northern Ireland don't own a home at all. Also, many people who do own homes, bought them from the council years ago for buttons and probably have the mortgage paid off. The number of people who actually took out £150k mortgages during the bubble years as a percentage of all households is very small. Indeed, statistics seem to suggest that just over 20,000 households (about 3% of all households) were unlucky enough to have bought when property prices were in various stages of silliness in Northern Ireland (2005-present) - http://www.dsdni.gov.uk/january_-_march_2011_internet_copy.doc The real figure is probably even less than that as cash purchases or purchases with high deposits are in that figure.

From memory there were over 20,000 sales per year prior to the crash, in 2005/2006 there were almost 40,000 transactions in one calendar year but the general average was around or just over 20,000 pa. Therefore I imagine there is over 20,000 people who purchased between 2005 and the peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information