Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Will The Temptation To Privatise The Nhs Become Too Strong?


Trampa501

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

The US have a working health system. That is a fact.

Whether you think it is better or worse is an opinion.

That is truly delusional. By the same token a box of plasters and a tube of antiseptic is a "working" health system. You have to be willing to define 'working' or it's meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442

That is truly delusional. By the same token a box of plasters and a tube of antiseptic is a "working" health system. You have to be willing to define 'working' or it's meaningless.

Come now... if it didn't work, no one would be getting any treatment. It may cost twice as much to do the same thing as the NHS, but that doesn't mean it doesn't work. Likewise, Singapore offering better healthcare doesn't mean the NHS doesn't work either.

I even bounded my original statement, saying that it was much discredited. I am hardly saying it is the best model there is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444

Just put on your thinking cap. <_<

The Government`s Chief Collecting Agency and Bank for all Government income known as HM Treasury. :rolleyes:

Are you suggesting that the rich pay for the poor and without their funding, the poor wouldn't be able to afford as many services?

I'm wondering why you're being so coy about this. It's classic socialist redistribution - stealing from one set, to give to another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

I am happy to debate how this can work in health care or anything else, but is just forcing people to do stuff, really the best we can do? Is it really the peak of civilisation? Do people really have such a low regard for other humans, that they need to be corralled into doing something against their will?

Problem is the vast majority would still choose to contribute to a 'state'.

I'm sure there must be some kind of middle ground, making it work so everyone is happy with their arrangements is the hard part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

Problem is the vast majority would still choose to contribute to a 'state'.

I'm sure there must be some kind of middle ground, making it work so everyone is happy with their arrangements is the hard part.

There's nothing wrong with that. Everyone is free to associate in groups, as well as with one another.

However, forcing people against their will to do the same, is wrong. It is tyrannous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447

Are you suggesting that the rich pay for the poor and without their funding, the poor wouldn't be able to afford as many services?

I'm wondering why you're being so coy about this. It's classic socialist redistribution - stealing from one set, to give to another.

The biggest load of love grenades I have had to read on this thread. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

Are you suggesting that the rich pay for the poor and without their funding, the poor wouldn't be able to afford as many services?

I'm wondering why you're being so coy about this. It's classic socialist redistribution - stealing from one set, to give to another.

What's wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information