Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

5 Worst Uk Cities For Getting A Job.hull,stoke,sunderland,the Wirral And Southend


Guest

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

http://www.telegraph...es.html?image=1

'1 Hull claimants per job 79.64

2 Stoke 73.22

3 Sunderland 53.66

4 Southend 44.06

5 The Wirrall 40.94'

Anyone know why Hull's so bad?

The geography is such that all the poor people live in Hull and all the rich people who work there live in surrounding countryside , villages and towns like Beverly.

So whilst bad, I would say the statistical area/geography is important and can be self reinforcing.

EDIT to add:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley

Beverley is a market town, civil parish and the county town of the East Riding of Yorkshire, England, located between the River Hull and the Westwood. The town is noted for Beverley Minster and architecturally-significant religious buildings along New Walk and other areas, as well as the Beverley Racecourse and the market place; the town itself is around 1,300 years old. It is also home to the oldest grammar school in the country, Beverley Grammar School.

...

For 22 years, Beverley was the administrative centre of the local government district of the Borough of Beverley, and is now the County Town of the East Riding. It is located 8 miles (13 km) north-west of Hull, 10 miles (16 km) east of Market Weighton and 12 miles (19 km) west of Hornsea. According to the 2001 United Kingdom Census the total population of the urban area of Beverley was 29,110 - of whom 17,549 live within the historic parish boundaries.[2] As well as its racecourse and markets, Beverley is known in the modern day for hosting various music festivals throughout the year, and also food festivals. In 2007 Beverley was named as the best place to live in the United Kingdom in an "Affordable Affluence" study by the Royal Bank of Scotland.[3]

Edited by !EURO!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443

The geography is such that all the poor people live in Hull and all the rich people who work there live in surrounding countryside , villages and towns like Beverly.

So whilst bad, I would say the statistical area/geography is important and can be self reinforcing.

Certainly the boundaries of the city are very close, omitting many of the more affluent suburbs. This skews the figures for quality of life stats which is why it is always near the bottom of such lists along with other cities where the boundary are similarly drawn, such as Nottingham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446

The geography is such that all the poor people live in Hull and all the rich people who work there live in surrounding countryside , villages and towns like Beverly.

So whilst bad, I would say the statistical area/geography is important and can be self reinforcing.

EDIT to add:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley

Part of the problem with Stoke is that it has no recognised centre. It's comprised of six small towns : Hanley, Burslem, Fenton that are a few miles apart. There is no recognised city centre for a business to locate to and/or invest in. Other problems are it's long-standing reuputaiton as a bit of a dump and that it spawned Robbie Williams :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447

The geography is such that all the poor people live in Hull and all the rich people who work there live in surrounding countryside , villages and towns like Beverly.

So whilst bad, I would say the statistical area/geography is important and can be self reinforcing.

EDIT to add:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley

Yep

Where as most Cities have afluent areas to pick them up, Hull's belongs to a different county council.

There's some really pretty (and bl00dy expensive) villages around the area, such as Burstwick, Welton, South Cave & North Ferriby.

Goole is another typically down trodden port town with a very bad press and high unemployment. Coincidently Goole is also surrounded by expensive and attractive semi rural areas, with Howden on it’s door step (another top 15 places to live in year 200x).

Edited by PopGun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

Hull was a terrible dump of a place when I lived there in the 90s. It's worse now. Nice people though (for the most part). It still astounds me that prices in east riding/humberside villages are still more expensive than Milton Keynes area though. All the public sector "workers" I guess.

Edited by ader
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

Part of the problem with Stoke is that it has no recognised centre. It's comprised of six small towns : Hanley, Burslem, Fenton that are a few miles apart. There is no recognised city centre for a business to locate to and/or invest in. Other problems are it's long-standing reuputaiton as a bit of a dump and that it spawned Robbie Williams :) .

Fenton?

Jesus Christ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410

Hull was a terrible dump of a place when I lived there in the 90s. It's worse now. Nice people though (for the most part).

It's vastly improved but still quite bad, especially when you compare it to say York or Newcastle.

However there's much much worse places to live imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413

The geography is such that all the poor people live in Hull and all the rich people who work there live in surrounding countryside , villages and towns like Beverly.

So whilst bad, I would say the statistical area/geography is important and can be self reinforcing.

EDIT to add:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley

There is ****** all jobs in Beverley, nice place as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/the-best-and-worst-places-to-find-work.html

There was also information on which jobs were in most demand – and where in the country they were most common.

Engineering, IT and sales and marketing were the most in-demand jobs – and also come with higher-than-average salaries.

Manchester had the most marketing and sales positions; Belfast was found to have the highest propiortion of call-centre jobs; secretaries and estate agents were in the most demand in London; while Edinburgh was best for jobs in finance.

By contrast, if you’re looking for an IT or construction job, Liverpool has the fewest opportunities.

Talk about "Give me the wretched refuse of your teeming shore."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416

Well I understand perfectly how you form that view. But remember, every town has shops, handymen, estate agents, radio etc and of course, people don't all work locally (they may commute the enormous distance of 8 miles to Hull for instance!). Probably a fair amount retired too. You could also argue that they aren't very well paid either...but that wasn't your point.

According to this Guardian article, the % of population claiming unemployment benefits in Beverley is 3.4% versus 4.4% for London.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/nov/17/unemployment-and-employment-statistics-economics

I formed my view from having family who live nearby. Unemployment in Yorks/East Yorkshire is 4.9%

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/eastyorkshire/9532895.Joblessness_up_in_York_and_hits_15_year_high_in_East_Yorkshire/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

Part of the problem with Stoke is that it has no recognised centre. It's comprised of six small towns : Hanley, Burslem, Fenton that are a few miles apart. There is no recognised city centre for a business to locate to and/or invest in. Other problems are it's long-standing reuputaiton as a bit of a dump and that it spawned Robbie Williams :) .

Stoke is the land that HPI forgot. It never really recovered from the loss of the Pottery industry. Although historical accounts suggest that at the height of the Potteries, it was impossible to tell night from day due to the smoke from the kilns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

Stoke is the land that HPI forgot. It never really recovered from the loss of the Pottery industry. Although historical accounts suggest that at the height of the Potteries, it was impossible to tell night from day due to the smoke from the kilns.

I've some friends in Yorkshire who moved here for work, from Stoke. They travel back to see family and watch the football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420

Really old inhabitants of the Potteries say that, like Sheffield in its heyday, black snow used to fall, and every time they loaded more coal into the pot bank, the dense smoke produced meant quite literally you could not see across the street. If you go a bit further back, a lot of workers suffered from the silica particles in the clay and glaze, causing `Potter’s Rot.’ or silicosis, as it is now called.

Now it’s much healthier, but most of the six towns are still depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information